Re: [PATCH v3 07/15] dt-bindings: riscv: Add Zic64b extension description

[Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1352 bytes --]

On Thu, Jun 04, 2026 at 01:23:24PM +0800, Guodong Xu wrote:
> Hi Rob, Conor,
> 
> On Wed, Jun 3, 2026 at 7:29 AM <sashiko-bot@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > The properties block requires multi-letter extensions to be sorted
> > alphanumerically. Because '6' comes before 'c', would it be more accurate to
> > place zic64b before ziccamoa?
> 
> On a double check, I found here Sashiko is flagging a real ordering issue.
> (Although it exists before my submission.)
> 
> In current riscv/extensions.yaml, zic* entries are split into two groups:
> one (ziccamoa etc.) sits above the Zk* block, the other (zicbom, zimop,
> etc.) sits below it. This is wrong considering the rule says "# multi-letter
> extensions, sorted alphanumerically".
> 
> Would you like a standalone patch that re-sorts the zi*/zk* ordering
> properly? It's purely cosmetic.

Please.

> 
> If there are no objections I can send it as part of my v4.
> Let me know what you think.
> 
> BR,
> Guodong
> 
> >
> > Does it make sense to place zic64b in its strictly correct alphanumeric
> > position, rather than continuing the out-of-order grouping of the existing
> > cache-block extensions like zicbom?
> >
> > [ ... ]
> >
> > --
> > Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260603-rva23u64-hwprobe-v2-v3-0-5529a7b28384@gmail.com?part=7

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]