From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Tanushree Shah" <tshah@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf data convert json: Fix trace_seq memory leak in process_sample_event()
Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2026 07:06:16 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260604070617.0050E1F00893@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260604065519.112101-1-tshah@linux.ibm.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] The `process_sample_event()` function leaks reference counts and memory associated with `struct addr_location` when a sample is skipped due to time filtering.
--
commit de6e4710063f2942dd58ebe436d7d992872132b3
Author: Tanushree Shah <tshah@linux.ibm.com>
perf data convert json: Fix trace_seq memory leak in process_sample_event()
This commit fixes a memory leak by ensuring trace_seq_destroy() is called
to pair with trace_seq_init() when formatting tracepoint raw data.
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/data-convert-json.c b/tools/perf/util/data-convert-json.c
> index d526c91312ed8..6dd9349ab10f1 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/data-convert-json.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/data-convert-json.c
> @@ -257,6 +257,7 @@ static int process_sample_event(const struct perf_tool *tool,
> trace_seq_init(&s);
> tep_print_field(&s, sample->raw_data, fields[i]);
> output_json_key_string(out, true, 3, fields[i]->name, s.buffer);
> + trace_seq_destroy(&s);
>
> i++;
> }
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does the early return path for skipped
samples higher up in process_sample_event() leak the addr_location
reference handles?
tools/perf/util/data-convert-json.c:process_sample_event() {
addr_location__init(&al);
if (machine__resolve(machine, &al, sample) < 0) {
pr_err("Sample resolution failed!\n");
addr_location__exit(&al);
return -1;
}
if (perf_time__ranges_skip_sample(c->ptime_range, c->range_num, sample->time)) {
++c->skipped;
return 0;
}
...
}
When machine__resolve() populates the addr_location structure, it acquires
reference handles for objects like thread and map. The early return for time
filtering bypasses the addr_location__exit() cleanup.
Could this cause reference counts and memory to leak when dropping skipped
samples?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260604065519.112101-1-tshah@linux.ibm.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-04 7:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-04 6:55 [PATCH] perf data convert json: Fix trace_seq memory leak in process_sample_event() Tanushree Shah
2026-06-04 7:06 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-04 16:10 ` Tanushree Shah
2026-06-04 21:29 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260604070617.0050E1F00893@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=tshah@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.