From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Damon Ding" <damon.ding@rock-chips.com>
Cc: conor+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, robh@kernel.org,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/4] dt-bindings: display: bridge: analogix-dp: Add data-lanes support for endpoint
Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2026 09:06:37 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260604090639.D40751F00893@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260604085220.2862986-2-damon.ding@rock-chips.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] The `data-lanes` property is defined strictly for the `endpoint` node name, causing schema validation to fail or miss constraints if applied to valid unit-addressed nodes like `endpoint@0`.
--
commit c6792a12ea4c785878c85982c6a4537b6a1901d6
Author: Damon Ding <damon.ding@rock-chips.com>
dt-bindings: display: bridge: analogix-dp: Add data-lanes support for endpoint
This commit adds data-lanes property support to the port@1 endpoint in
the analogix-dp bridge binding to allow physical lane mapping configuration.
It also updates the Rockchip eDP DT node example to demonstrate its usage.
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/analogix,dp.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/analogix,dp.yaml
> index 62f0521b09245..ecf206871cdde 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/analogix,dp.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/analogix,dp.yaml
> @@ -42,13 +42,22 @@ properties:
> properties:
> port@0:
[ ... ]
> port@1:
> - $ref: /schemas/graph.yaml#/properties/port
> - description:
> - Port node with one endpoint connected to a dp-connector node.
> + $ref: /schemas/graph.yaml#/$defs/port-base
> + unevaluatedProperties: false
> + description: Port node with one endpoint connected to sink device node.
> + properties:
> + endpoint:
^^^^^^^^
[Severity: Medium]
Does restricting this to the exact node name 'endpoint' cause validation
issues for unit-addressed nodes?
Because JSON Schema strictly matches object keys, a node named endpoint@0
under port@1 will bypass this block, meaning the video-interfaces $ref
and data-lanes validation constraints are never applied.
Should this use patternProperties: "^endpoint(@[0-9a-f]+)?$": instead
of properties: endpoint: to ensure unit-addressed endpoint nodes don't
bypass these constraints?
> + $ref: /schemas/media/video-interfaces.yaml#
> + unevaluatedProperties: false
> + properties:
> + data-lanes:
> + minItems: 1
> + maxItems: 4
> + items:
> + enum: [ 0, 1, 2, 3 ]
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260604085220.2862986-1-damon.ding@rock-chips.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-04 9:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-04 8:52 [PATCH v5 0/4] Add eDP lane mapping support Damon Ding
2026-06-04 8:52 ` Damon Ding
2026-06-04 8:52 ` [PATCH v5 1/4] dt-bindings: display: bridge: analogix-dp: Add data-lanes support for endpoint Damon Ding
2026-06-04 8:52 ` Damon Ding
2026-06-04 9:06 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-04 18:43 ` Rob Herring
2026-06-04 8:52 ` [PATCH v5 2/4] drm/dp: Add helper to validate DP lane counts Damon Ding
2026-06-04 8:52 ` Damon Ding
2026-06-04 8:52 ` [PATCH v5 3/4] drm/bridge: analogix_dp: Add validation for samsung,lane-count property Damon Ding
2026-06-04 8:52 ` Damon Ding
2026-06-04 8:52 ` [PATCH v5 3/4] drm/bridge: analogix_dp: Add validation for samsung, lane-count property Damon Ding
2026-06-04 9:09 ` [PATCH v5 3/4] drm/bridge: analogix_dp: Add validation for samsung,lane-count property sashiko-bot
2026-06-04 8:52 ` [PATCH v5 4/4] drm/bridge: analogix_dp: Add support for optional data-lanes mapping Damon Ding
2026-06-04 8:52 ` Damon Ding
2026-06-04 9:04 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260604090639.D40751F00893@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=damon.ding@rock-chips.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.