From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Boqun Feng" <boqun@kernel.org>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ojeda@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 10/13] preempt: Introduce HAS_SEPARATE_PREEMPT_RESCHED_BITS
Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2026 05:59:55 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260605055956.46EC81F00893@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260605054128.5925-11-boqun@kernel.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] Unconditional select of `HAS_SEPARATE_PREEMPT_RESCHED_BITS` violates Kconfig dependency on `PREEMPT_COUNT`.
--
commit 0d37eeeba0d2e4fb4b795207e44eb2cab20db648
Author: Boqun Feng <boqun@kernel.org>
preempt: Introduce HAS_SEPARATE_PREEMPT_RESCHED_BITS
This commit introduces HAS_SEPARATE_PREEMPT_RESCHED_BITS to allow 64-bit
architectures to maintain NMI nesting bits in the 32-bit preempt count,
avoiding the need to maintain them outside the same cache line. It also
enables this feature for x86_64.
Originally-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun@kernel.org>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> index fdaef60b46d65..9a35c3a087573 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> @@ -329,6 +329,7 @@ config X86
> select USER_STACKTRACE_SUPPORT
> select HAVE_ARCH_KCSAN if X86_64
> select PROC_PID_ARCH_STATUS if PROC_FS
> + select HAS_SEPARATE_PREEMPT_RESCHED_BITS if X86_64
[Severity: Medium]
Will selecting HAS_SEPARATE_PREEMPT_RESCHED_BITS unconditionally for X86_64
cause Kconfig unmet direct dependency warnings if PREEMPT_COUNT is disabled?
Looking at the definition in kernel/Kconfig.preempt, the config symbol
HAS_SEPARATE_PREEMPT_RESCHED_BITS explicitly depends on PREEMPT_COUNT:
config HAS_SEPARATE_PREEMPT_RESCHED_BITS
bool
depends on PREEMPT_COUNT && 64BIT
Because select bypasses depends on, configuring a kernel where PREEMPT_COUNT
is disabled (e.g., PREEMPT_NONE=y with no debug options) might force the
target symbol to y. Should this select be conditional on PREEMPT_COUNT?
> select HAVE_ARCH_NODE_DEV_GROUP if X86_SGX
> select FUNCTION_ALIGNMENT_16B if X86_64 || X86_ALIGNMENT_16
> select FUNCTION_ALIGNMENT_4B
[ ... ]
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260605054128.5925-1-boqun@kernel.org?part=10
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-05 5:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-05 5:41 [PATCH v3 00/13] Refcounted interrupt disable and SpinLockIrq for rust (Part 1) Boqun Feng
2026-06-05 5:41 ` [PATCH v3 01/13] preempt: Track NMI nesting to separate per-CPU counter Boqun Feng
2026-06-05 5:59 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-05 5:41 ` [PATCH v3 02/13] preempt: Introduce HARDIRQ_DISABLE_BITS Boqun Feng
2026-06-05 6:01 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-05 5:41 ` [PATCH v3 03/13] preempt: Introduce __preempt_count_{sub, add}_return() Boqun Feng
2026-06-05 5:59 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-05 6:30 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-06-05 6:45 ` Boqun Feng
2026-06-05 5:41 ` [PATCH v3 04/13] openrisc: Include <linux/cpumask.h> in smp.h Boqun Feng
2026-06-05 5:41 ` [PATCH v3 05/13] irq & spin_lock: Add counted interrupt disabling/enabling Boqun Feng
2026-06-05 6:01 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-05 6:27 ` Boqun Feng
2026-06-05 6:30 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-06-05 6:40 ` Boqun Feng
2026-06-05 5:41 ` [PATCH v3 06/13] irq: Add KUnit test for refcounted interrupt enable/disable Boqun Feng
2026-06-05 5:53 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-05 5:41 ` [PATCH v3 07/13] locking: Switch to _irq_{disable,enable}() variants in cleanup guards Boqun Feng
2026-06-05 5:57 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-05 5:41 ` [PATCH v3 08/13] sched: Remove the unused preempt_offset parameter of __cant_sleep() Boqun Feng
2026-06-05 5:41 ` [PATCH v3 09/13] sched: Avoid signed comparison of preempt_count() in __cant_migrate() Boqun Feng
2026-06-05 5:41 ` [PATCH v3 10/13] preempt: Introduce HAS_SEPARATE_PREEMPT_RESCHED_BITS Boqun Feng
2026-06-05 5:59 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-05 6:30 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-06-05 5:41 ` [PATCH v3 11/13] arm64: sched/preempt: Enable HAS_SEPARATE_PREEMPT_RESCHED_BITS Boqun Feng
2026-06-05 5:41 ` [PATCH v3 12/13] s390/preempt: " Boqun Feng
2026-06-05 5:41 ` [PATCH v3 13/13] irq: Optimize reschedule check in local_interrupt_enable() Boqun Feng
2026-06-05 6:04 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260605055956.46EC81F00893@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=boqun@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.