From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
Cc: kevin.tian@intel.com, iommu@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH rc v2 0/4] iommufd: Fix veventq_depth boundary
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2026 10:43:47 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260605134347.GA1962447@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1779408671.git.nicolinc@nvidia.com>
On Thu, May 21, 2026 at 05:36:31PM -0700, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> The upper bound of veventq_depth has been missing for veventq allocation,
> leaving a vulnerability where userspace could exhaust atomic memory pool.
>
> Fix it properly:
> - Allocate outside the spinlock to avoid GFP_ATOMIC
> - Cap the veventq_depth upper bound
> - Fix event_data byte-count
> - Add selftest coverage
>
> Note that QEMU's SMMU has been already allocating veventq using a "HW"
> EVTQ entry number. So, picking 19 as the known use case, for a minimal
> level of ABI consistency.
>
> This is on github:
> https://github.com/nicolinc/iommufd/commits/fix_veventq_depth-v2
>
> Changelog:
> v2
> * Add Reviewed-by from Jason
> * Rebase on Jason's for-rc tree
> * Update commit message for clarification
> * Move "data_len byte-count" to the first
> * Drop optimistic read in the allocation path
> v1
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1779070992.git.nicolinc@nvidia.com/
>
> Nicolin Chen (4):
> iommufd: Fix data_len byte-count vs element-count mismatch
> iommufd: Move vevent memory allocation outside spinlock
> iommufd: Set veventq_depth upper bound
> iommufd/selftest: Add boundary tests for veventq_depth
I applied this a few days ago
Jason
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-05 13:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-22 0:36 [PATCH rc v2 0/4] iommufd: Fix veventq_depth boundary Nicolin Chen
2026-05-22 0:36 ` [PATCH rc v2 1/4] iommufd: Fix data_len byte-count vs element-count mismatch Nicolin Chen
2026-05-25 6:49 ` Tian, Kevin
2026-05-22 0:36 ` [PATCH rc v2 2/4] iommufd: Move vevent memory allocation outside spinlock Nicolin Chen
2026-05-25 6:50 ` Tian, Kevin
2026-05-22 0:36 ` [PATCH rc v2 3/4] iommufd: Set veventq_depth upper bound Nicolin Chen
2026-05-25 6:52 ` Tian, Kevin
2026-05-25 18:41 ` Nicolin Chen
2026-05-22 0:36 ` [PATCH rc v2 4/4] iommufd/selftest: Add boundary tests for veventq_depth Nicolin Chen
2026-05-25 6:52 ` Tian, Kevin
2026-06-05 13:43 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260605134347.GA1962447@nvidia.com \
--to=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.