From: David Laight <david.laight.linux@gmail.com>
To: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>,
metze@samba.org, axboe@kernel.dk,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>,
io-uring@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 0/4] net: move .getsockopt away from __user buffers (update 1)
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2026 16:14:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260605161424.334a05d5@pumpkin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aiK94g9vphHls3x_@gmail.com>
On Fri, 5 Jun 2026 05:25:21 -0700
Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 08, 2026 at 03:30:28AM -0700, Breno Leitao wrote:
> > Currently, the .getsockopt callback requires __user pointers:
> >
> > int (*getsockopt)(struct socket *sock, int level,
> > int optname, char __user *optval, int __user *optlen);
> >
> > This prevents kernel callers (io_uring, BPF) from using getsockopt on
> > levels other than SOL_SOCKET, since they pass kernel pointers.
> >
> > Following Linus' suggestion [0], this series introduces sockopt_t, a
> > type-safe wrapper around iov_iter,
I'd have thought it would also have been better to use a wrapper function
instead of direct calls to copy_from_iter().
There is no need for most of the code to know there is a iov_iter hiding
inside sockopt_t.
-- David
> > and a getsockopt_iter callback that
> > works with both user and kernel buffers. AF_PACKET and CAN raw are
> > converted as initial users, with selftests covering the trickiest
> > conversion patterns.
>
> Quick update on this effort.
>
> All proto_ops users have been converted to getsockopt_iter and submitted.
>
> Most conversions are already in linux-next. Three remain:
>
> 1) rds: Under review
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260605-getsock_more-v2-3-80f38cdb8706@debian.org/
>
> 2) smc: Submitted today. This is only limited to UBUF right now
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260605-getsockopt_smc-v1-1-65da62fa44c4@debian.org/
>
> 3) CAN drivers: Reviewed and acked, pending Marc's merge
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/f83e25e1-b9f5-4810-bbd6-fdb8d2a10c8e@hartkopp.net/
>
> Once these are merged, I'll rename getsockopt_iter to getsockopt and
> remove the legacy path.
>
> Next, I'll convert struct proto the same way to eliminate the remaining
> userspace optlen/optval pointers.
>
> After that, io_uring getsockopt operations will be unblocked.
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-05 15:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-08 10:30 [PATCH net-next v3 0/4] net: move .getsockopt away from __user buffers Breno Leitao
2026-04-08 10:30 ` [PATCH net-next v3 1/4] net: add getsockopt_iter callback to proto_ops Breno Leitao
2026-04-08 10:30 ` [PATCH net-next v3 2/4] net: call getsockopt_iter if available Breno Leitao
2026-04-08 10:30 ` [PATCH net-next v3 3/4] af_packet: convert to getsockopt_iter Breno Leitao
2026-04-08 10:30 ` [PATCH net-next v3 4/4] can: raw: " Breno Leitao
2026-04-08 11:26 ` [PATCH net-next v3 0/4] net: move .getsockopt away from __user buffers David Laight
2026-04-08 13:52 ` Breno Leitao
2026-04-08 18:56 ` David Laight
2026-04-10 12:29 ` Breno Leitao
2026-04-10 14:15 ` David Laight
2026-04-08 13:56 ` Stefan Metzmacher
2026-04-09 8:39 ` Stefan Metzmacher
2026-04-08 17:02 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2026-04-10 12:52 ` Breno Leitao
2026-04-10 15:11 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2026-04-13 22:30 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2026-06-05 12:25 ` [PATCH net-next v3 0/4] net: move .getsockopt away from __user buffers (update 1) Breno Leitao
2026-06-05 15:14 ` David Laight [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260605161424.334a05d5@pumpkin \
--to=david.laight.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=io-uring@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kuniyu@google.com \
--cc=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=metze@samba.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=willemb@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.