From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>
Cc: <davem@davemloft.net>, <pabeni@redhat.com>, <edumazet@google.com>,
<andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
<poros@redhat.com>, <arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com>,
<przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>, <horms@kernel.org>,
<aleksandr.loktionov@intel.com>, <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de>,
<sx.rinitha@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/3] i40e: keep q_vectors array in sync with channel count changes
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2026 16:39:34 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260605163934.547c7bdd@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <25ca3a21-7d29-47e8-a0fb-5fbb7ddfea99@intel.com>
On Fri, 5 Jun 2026 11:01:19 -0700 Tony Nguyen wrote:
> > Should the new err_lump label, and the existing err_vsi exits from the
> > two allocation steps above, instead unwind through the err_rings block
> > (unregister_netdev / free_netdev / i40e_devlink_destroy_port /
> > i40e_aq_delete_element) the way i40e_vsi_setup()'s err_msix path does?
> >
> > The pre-patch code had the same defective err_vsi target for the
> > qp_pile and arrays paths, but the patch adds two new failure points
> > (the unconditional q_vectors kzalloc and the new
> > i40e_vsi_setup_vectors() call) that route into it during reset
> > rebuild, where vsi->netdev is already registered.
>
> This does seem valid, but as mentioned by Sashiko the pre-patch code has
> the same target/issue. There's a recent submission [1], with changes
> requested, that should cover this. Did you want to take this now or wait
> and have it sent with this other one?
Hm. I convinced myself yesterday that the old code did _not_
have the issue because it was pass false as the second arg to
i40e_vsi_{alloc,free}_arrays() ? Good chance that I misread,
it's tricky code. As much as I would love to apply this to prevent
the deadlock in NIPA - let's wait for the follow up. I'll pick up
the other two patches from this series off the list.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-05 23:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-02 22:55 [PATCH net 0/3][pull request] Intel Wired LAN Driver Updates 2026-06-02 (i40e, ice, idpf) Tony Nguyen
2026-06-02 22:55 ` [PATCH net 1/3] i40e: keep q_vectors array in sync with channel count changes Tony Nguyen
2026-06-04 1:27 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-06-05 18:01 ` Tony Nguyen
2026-06-05 23:39 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2026-06-02 22:55 ` [PATCH net 2/3] ice: fix missing priority callbacks for U.FL DPLL pins Tony Nguyen
2026-06-02 22:55 ` [PATCH net 3/3] idpf: fix mailbox capability for set device clock time Tony Nguyen
2026-06-05 23:50 ` [PATCH net 0/3][pull request] Intel Wired LAN Driver Updates 2026-06-02 (i40e, ice, idpf) patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260605163934.547c7bdd@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=aleksandr.loktionov@intel.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
--cc=arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de \
--cc=poros@redhat.com \
--cc=przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com \
--cc=sx.rinitha@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.