All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Biggers via Linux-f2fs-devel <linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
To: Daeho Jeong <daeho43@gmail.com>
Cc: Daeho Jeong <daehojeong@google.com>,
	kernel-team@android.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v2] f2fs: support dynamic include/exclude for device aliasing
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2026 22:10:27 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260605221027.GA2312230@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260605212504.1080138-1-daeho43@gmail.com>

On Fri, Jun 05, 2026 at 02:25:04PM -0700, Daeho Jeong wrote:
> - F2FS_IOC_EXCLUDE_DEV_ALIAS: This reclaims the space occupied by a
>   device aliasing file. It first performs a capacity check, resets GC
>   victim information for the target range, marks the segments as in-use
>   to prevent new allocations, and then triggers GC to migrate existing
>   valid data out of the range. Finally, it reserves these blocks in the
>   SIT to effectively exclude the device from the usable capacity.

Does this do anything to zeroize the device so that random data isn't
leaked in it, or is that the responsibility of the userspace code that
reallocates the device to something?

> @@ -2214,7 +2231,8 @@ static const struct {
>  		FS_INLINE_DATA_FL |	\
>  		FS_NOCOW_FL |		\
>  		FS_VERITY_FL |		\
> -		FS_CASEFOLD_FL)
> +		FS_CASEFOLD_FL |	\
> +		F2FS_DEVICE_ALIAS_FL)

This is extending FS_IOC_GETFLAGS, which you probably don't really want
to be doing, right?

- Eric


_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: Daeho Jeong <daeho43@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, kernel-team@android.com,
	Daeho Jeong <daehojeong@google.com>
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v2] f2fs: support dynamic include/exclude for device aliasing
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2026 22:10:27 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260605221027.GA2312230@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260605212504.1080138-1-daeho43@gmail.com>

On Fri, Jun 05, 2026 at 02:25:04PM -0700, Daeho Jeong wrote:
> - F2FS_IOC_EXCLUDE_DEV_ALIAS: This reclaims the space occupied by a
>   device aliasing file. It first performs a capacity check, resets GC
>   victim information for the target range, marks the segments as in-use
>   to prevent new allocations, and then triggers GC to migrate existing
>   valid data out of the range. Finally, it reserves these blocks in the
>   SIT to effectively exclude the device from the usable capacity.

Does this do anything to zeroize the device so that random data isn't
leaked in it, or is that the responsibility of the userspace code that
reallocates the device to something?

> @@ -2214,7 +2231,8 @@ static const struct {
>  		FS_INLINE_DATA_FL |	\
>  		FS_NOCOW_FL |		\
>  		FS_VERITY_FL |		\
> -		FS_CASEFOLD_FL)
> +		FS_CASEFOLD_FL |	\
> +		F2FS_DEVICE_ALIAS_FL)

This is extending FS_IOC_GETFLAGS, which you probably don't really want
to be doing, right?

- Eric

  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-05 22:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-05 21:25 [PATCH v2] f2fs: support dynamic include/exclude for device aliasing Daeho Jeong
2026-06-05 21:25 ` [f2fs-dev] " Daeho Jeong
2026-06-05 22:10 ` Eric Biggers via Linux-f2fs-devel [this message]
2026-06-05 22:10   ` Eric Biggers
2026-06-05 23:51   ` Daeho Jeong
2026-06-05 23:51     ` Daeho Jeong
2026-06-06  0:32     ` Eric Biggers
2026-06-06  0:32       ` Eric Biggers via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-06-06  1:04       ` Daeho Jeong
2026-06-06  1:04         ` Daeho Jeong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260605221027.GA2312230@google.com \
    --to=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=daeho43@gmail.com \
    --cc=daehojeong@google.com \
    --cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.