From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo" <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] perf stat: Bounds-check CPU index in topology aggregation callbacks
Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2026 23:55:49 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260605235549.7337F1F00893@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260605233837.1773732-3-acme@kernel.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Incomplete bounds-check fix: Missing NULL pointer check before accessing `env->cpu` array in `perf_env__get_*_aggr_by_cpu` callbacks.
- [High] Out-of-bounds heap read due to unvalidated `sample->cpu` index in `perf_event__preprocess_sample()`.
--
commit ebd8bf34de713904cef201f9c6fa2181cf91d727
Author: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
perf stat: Bounds-check CPU index in topology aggregation callbacks
This commit updates six perf_env__get_*_aggr_by_cpu() functions to properly
bounds-check the CPU index against env->nr_cpus_avail. This prevents
out-of-bounds heap reads when processing untrusted perf.data files.
> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c b/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c
> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c
> @@ -1638,7 +1638,8 @@ static struct aggr_cpu_id perf_env__get_socket_aggr_by_cpu(struct perf_cpu cpu,
> struct perf_env *env = data;
> struct aggr_cpu_id id = aggr_cpu_id__empty();
>
> - if (cpu.cpu != -1)
> + /* env->cpu[] has env->nr_cpus_avail entries; reject untrusted indices */
> + if (cpu.cpu >= 0 && cpu.cpu < env->nr_cpus_avail)
> id.socket = env->cpu[cpu.cpu].socket_id;
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but is it possible for env->cpu to be NULL
here while env->nr_cpus_avail is greater than zero?
When parsing an older perf.data file, process_cpu_topology() can free
env->cpu while leaving env->nr_cpus_avail populated.
If this occurs, the bounds check cpu.cpu < env->nr_cpus_avail would pass,
but accessing env->cpu[cpu.cpu] would result in a NULL pointer dereference.
Does this code need an additional check to ensure env->cpu is not NULL?
[ ... ]
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but while looking at CPU index
bounds checking, is there a similar missing upper-bound check in
perf_event__preprocess_sample()?
In tools/perf/util/event.c:perf_event__preprocess_sample(), the untrusted
sample->cpu value is checked for negative values, but does not appear to be
checked against env->nr_cpus_avail before accessing the env->cpu array:
if (al->cpu >= 0)
al->socket = env->cpu[al->cpu].socket_id;
Could a large positive value for al->cpu bypass this check and cause an
out-of-bounds heap read from the env->cpu array?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260605233837.1773732-1-acme@kernel.org?part=2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-05 23:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-05 23:38 [PATCHES v2 0/9] perf tools: Fix OOB writes, refcount bugs, and BUG_ON in mmap/stat/c2c/sched Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-06-05 23:38 ` [PATCH 1/9] perf mmap: Guard cpu__get_node() return in aio_bind() Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-06-05 23:56 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-06 12:29 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-06-05 23:38 ` [PATCH 2/9] perf stat: Bounds-check CPU index in topology aggregation callbacks Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-06-05 23:55 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-05 23:38 ` [PATCH 3/9] perf c2c: Bounds-check CPU and node IDs before bitmap and array access Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-06-05 23:54 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-05 23:38 ` [PATCH 4/9] perf c2c: Bounds-check CPU IDs in setup_nodes() topology loop Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-06-05 23:38 ` [PATCH 5/9] perf sched: Clean up idle_threads entry on init failure Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-06-05 23:56 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-06 15:46 ` David Ahern
2026-06-05 23:38 ` [PATCH 6/9] perf sched: Use is_idle_sample() for idle thread runtime cast guard Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-06-05 23:38 ` [PATCH 7/9] perf sched: Fix thread reference leak in idle hist processing Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-06-05 23:56 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-06 15:47 ` David Ahern
2026-06-05 23:38 ` [PATCH 8/9] perf sched: Use thread__put() in free_idle_threads() Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-06-06 15:49 ` David Ahern
2026-06-05 23:38 ` [PATCH 9/9] perf sched: Replace BUG_ON and add NULL checks in replay event helpers Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260605235549.7337F1F00893@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.