From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Dmitry Baryshkov" <dmitry.baryshkov@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, neil.armstrong@linaro.org,
linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/8] drm/bridge: pass down IRQ_HPD to the drivers
Date: Sun, 07 Jun 2026 21:49:20 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260607214920.72D601F00893@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260608-hpd-irq-events-v4-5-30b62b335487@oss.qualcomm.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Modifying connector EDID properties without holding `mode_config.mutex` during asynchronous hotplug notifications.
--
commit 6e60e13be304386d0a94f5ceade83e44677e2a2a
Author: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@oss.qualcomm.com>
drm/bridge: pass down IRQ_HPD to the drivers
The DisplayPort standard defines a special kind of HPD events called IRQ_HPD.
These events are used to notify DP Source about the events on the Sink side.
This commit passes down the extra status to the bridge drivers via the
hpd_notify() callback.
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/lontium-lt9611uxc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/lontium-lt9611uxc.c
> index 9427cc2358ae1..8cb17bd0e2387 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/lontium-lt9611uxc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/lontium-lt9611uxc.c
> @@ -429,7 +429,8 @@ static const struct drm_edid *lt9611uxc_bridge_edid_read(struct drm_bridge *brid
>
> static void lt9611uxc_bridge_hpd_notify(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
> struct drm_connector *connector,
> - enum drm_connector_status status)
> + enum drm_connector_status status,
> + enum drm_connector_status_extra extra_status)
> {
> const struct drm_edid *drm_edid;
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but I noticed a potential locking
issue here in lt9611uxc_bridge_hpd_notify().
This function calls drm_edid_connector_update(), which modifies
connector->edid_blob_ptr. According to DRM documentation, edid_blob_ptr access
and modification via drm_property_replace_global_blob must be protected by
mode_config.mutex.
However, when the hpd_notify pipeline is triggered asynchronously via
drm_bridge_connector_handle_hpd() in drm_bridge_connector.c, the caller
intentionally drops the lock prior to executing the callbacks:
drm_bridge_connector_handle_hpd() {
...
mutex_unlock(&dev->mode_config.mutex);
drm_bridge_connector_hpd_notify(connector, status, extra_status);
...
}
Could this lead to a data race on connector->edid_blob_ptr if hotplug events
occur concurrently with userspace queries or modesets, potentially causing a
double-free or use-after-free of the blob data?
[ ... ]
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260608-hpd-irq-events-v4-0-30b62b335487@oss.qualcomm.com?part=5
_______________________________________________
linux-amlogic mailing list
linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-amlogic
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Dmitry Baryshkov" <dmitry.baryshkov@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, neil.armstrong@linaro.org,
linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/8] drm/bridge: pass down IRQ_HPD to the drivers
Date: Sun, 07 Jun 2026 21:49:20 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260607214920.72D601F00893@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260608-hpd-irq-events-v4-5-30b62b335487@oss.qualcomm.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Modifying connector EDID properties without holding `mode_config.mutex` during asynchronous hotplug notifications.
--
commit 6e60e13be304386d0a94f5ceade83e44677e2a2a
Author: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@oss.qualcomm.com>
drm/bridge: pass down IRQ_HPD to the drivers
The DisplayPort standard defines a special kind of HPD events called IRQ_HPD.
These events are used to notify DP Source about the events on the Sink side.
This commit passes down the extra status to the bridge drivers via the
hpd_notify() callback.
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/lontium-lt9611uxc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/lontium-lt9611uxc.c
> index 9427cc2358ae1..8cb17bd0e2387 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/lontium-lt9611uxc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/lontium-lt9611uxc.c
> @@ -429,7 +429,8 @@ static const struct drm_edid *lt9611uxc_bridge_edid_read(struct drm_bridge *brid
>
> static void lt9611uxc_bridge_hpd_notify(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
> struct drm_connector *connector,
> - enum drm_connector_status status)
> + enum drm_connector_status status,
> + enum drm_connector_status_extra extra_status)
> {
> const struct drm_edid *drm_edid;
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but I noticed a potential locking
issue here in lt9611uxc_bridge_hpd_notify().
This function calls drm_edid_connector_update(), which modifies
connector->edid_blob_ptr. According to DRM documentation, edid_blob_ptr access
and modification via drm_property_replace_global_blob must be protected by
mode_config.mutex.
However, when the hpd_notify pipeline is triggered asynchronously via
drm_bridge_connector_handle_hpd() in drm_bridge_connector.c, the caller
intentionally drops the lock prior to executing the callbacks:
drm_bridge_connector_handle_hpd() {
...
mutex_unlock(&dev->mode_config.mutex);
drm_bridge_connector_hpd_notify(connector, status, extra_status);
...
}
Could this lead to a data race on connector->edid_blob_ptr if hotplug events
occur concurrently with userspace queries or modesets, potentially causing a
double-free or use-after-free of the blob data?
[ ... ]
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260608-hpd-irq-events-v4-0-30b62b335487@oss.qualcomm.com?part=5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-07 21:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-07 21:33 [PATCH v4 0/8] drm: handle IRQ_HPD events correctly Dmitry Baryshkov
2026-06-07 21:33 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2026-06-07 21:33 ` [PATCH v4 1/8] drm/connector: report out-of-band IRQ_HPD events Dmitry Baryshkov
2026-06-07 21:33 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2026-06-07 21:46 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-07 21:46 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-07 21:33 ` [PATCH v4 2/8] drm/connector: pass down IRQ_HPD to the drivers Dmitry Baryshkov
2026-06-07 21:33 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2026-06-07 21:33 ` [PATCH v4 3/8] drm/bridge: aux-hpd: let drivers pass IRQ_HPD events Dmitry Baryshkov
2026-06-07 21:33 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2026-06-07 21:33 ` [PATCH v4 4/8] drm/bridge: pass extra events to the HPD callback Dmitry Baryshkov
2026-06-07 21:33 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2026-06-08 8:39 ` Francesco Dolcini
2026-06-08 8:39 ` Francesco Dolcini
2026-06-07 21:33 ` [PATCH v4 5/8] drm/bridge: pass down IRQ_HPD to the drivers Dmitry Baryshkov
2026-06-07 21:33 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2026-06-07 21:49 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-07 21:49 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-07 21:33 ` [PATCH v4 6/8] drm/msm: dp: handle the IRQ_HPD events reported by USB-C Dmitry Baryshkov
2026-06-07 21:33 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2026-06-07 21:48 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-07 21:48 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-08 6:12 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2026-06-08 6:12 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2026-06-07 21:33 ` [PATCH v4 7/8] soc: qcom: pmic-glink-altmode: pass down HPD_IRQ events Dmitry Baryshkov
2026-06-07 21:33 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2026-06-07 21:46 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-07 21:46 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-07 21:33 ` [PATCH v4 8/8] usb: typec: ucsi: huawei-gaokun: " Dmitry Baryshkov
2026-06-07 21:33 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2026-06-07 21:46 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-07 21:46 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-07 21:55 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2026-06-07 21:55 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2026-06-07 21:43 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for drm: handle IRQ_HPD events correctly (rev5) Patchwork
2026-06-07 21:44 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2026-06-07 22:23 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-06-07 22:37 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-06-07 23:32 ` ✓ Xe.CI.FULL: " Patchwork
2026-06-08 0:37 ` ✗ i915.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260607214920.72D601F00893@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=dmitry.baryshkov@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.