From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Ankur Arora" <ankur.a.arora@oracle.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 07/15] atomic: Add atomic_cond_read_*_timeout()
Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2026 08:23:04 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260608082304.ADEA61F00893@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260608080440.127491-8-ankur.a.arora@oracle.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] The `atomic64_cond_read_acquire_timeout` and `atomic64_cond_read_relaxed_timeout` macros can cause torn reads and synchronization failures on 32-bit architectures.
--
commit aafb3af0335d368d82aaca86bf6b2a18f8ae6033
Author: Ankur Arora <ankur.a.arora@oracle.com>
atomic: Add atomic_cond_read_*_timeout()
Add atomic load wrappers, atomic_cond_read_*_timeout() and
atomic64_cond_read_*_timeout() for the cond-load timeout interfaces. Also
add a short description for the interfaces.
> diff --git a/include/linux/atomic.h b/include/linux/atomic.h
> index 8dd57c3a99e9b..5bcb86e077845 100644
> --- a/include/linux/atomic.h
> +++ b/include/linux/atomic.h
[ ... ]
> @@ -31,6 +31,16 @@
> #define atomic64_cond_read_acquire(v, c) smp_cond_load_acquire(&(v)->counter, (c))
> #define atomic64_cond_read_relaxed(v, c) smp_cond_load_relaxed(&(v)->counter, (c))
>
> +#define atomic_cond_read_acquire_timeout(v, c, e, t) \
> + smp_cond_load_acquire_timeout(&(v)->counter, (c), (e), (t))
> +#define atomic_cond_read_relaxed_timeout(v, c, e, t) \
> + smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout(&(v)->counter, (c), (e), (t))
> +
> +#define atomic64_cond_read_acquire_timeout(v, c, e, t) \
> + smp_cond_load_acquire_timeout(&(v)->counter, (c), (e), (t))
> +#define atomic64_cond_read_relaxed_timeout(v, c, e, t) \
> + smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout(&(v)->counter, (c), (e), (t))
[Severity: High]
Will this cause torn reads and synchronization failures on 32-bit
architectures?
On 32-bit platforms, atomic64_t operations typically rely on spinlocks or
specific instructions to prevent tearing. These new macros bypass the
architecture-specific atomic64_read() and directly use
smp_cond_load_acquire_timeout() and smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout() on the
counter member.
These macros poll using a lockless READ_ONCE(). On 32-bit systems, a 64-bit
READ_ONCE() compiles into two separate 32-bit memory loads. If concurrent
writers modify the counter via spinlocked atomic64 operations, the lockless
polling loop could observe torn (partially updated) reads.
If a torn read spuriously satisfies the polling condition, the loop might exit
prematurely with a corrupt value.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260608080440.127491-1-ankur.a.arora@oracle.com?part=7
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-08 8:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-08 8:04 [PATCH v12 00/15] barrier: Add smp_cond_load_{relaxed,acquire}_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-06-08 8:04 ` [PATCH v12 01/15] asm-generic: barrier: Add smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-06-08 8:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-08 8:53 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-06-08 8:04 ` [PATCH v12 02/15] arm64: barrier: Support smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-06-08 8:31 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-08 8:53 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-06-08 8:04 ` [PATCH v12 03/15] arm64/delay: move some constants out to a separate header Ankur Arora
2026-06-08 8:22 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-08 8:04 ` [PATCH v12 04/15] arm64: support WFET in smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-06-08 8:27 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-08 8:04 ` [PATCH v12 05/15] arm64: rqspinlock: Remove private copy of smp_cond_load_acquire_timewait() Ankur Arora
2026-06-08 8:19 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-08 8:53 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-06-08 8:04 ` [PATCH v12 06/15] asm-generic: barrier: Add smp_cond_load_acquire_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-06-08 8:27 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-08 8:04 ` [PATCH v12 07/15] atomic: Add atomic_cond_read_*_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-06-08 8:23 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-08 8:04 ` [PATCH v12 08/15] locking/atomic: scripts: build atomic_long_cond_read_*_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-06-08 8:04 ` [PATCH v12 09/15] bpf/rqspinlock: switch check_timeout() to a clock interface Ankur Arora
2026-06-08 8:04 ` [PATCH v12 10/15] bpf/rqspinlock: Use smp_cond_load_acquire_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-06-08 9:04 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-06-08 8:04 ` [PATCH v12 11/15] sched: add need-resched timed wait interface Ankur Arora
2026-06-08 8:04 ` [PATCH v12 12/15] cpuidle/poll_state: Wait for need-resched via tif_need_resched_relaxed_wait() Ankur Arora
2026-06-08 8:31 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-08 8:04 ` [PATCH v12 13/15] arm64/delay: enable testing smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-06-08 8:32 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-08 8:04 ` [PATCH v12 14/15] barrier: add tests for smp_cond_load_*_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-06-08 8:04 ` [PATCH v12 15/15] barrier: add clock tests for smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-06-08 8:34 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260608082304.ADEA61F00893@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=ankur.a.arora@oracle.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.