From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Hungyu Lin" <dennylin0707@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] media: qcom: iris: fix runtime PM reference leaks
Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2026 08:28:11 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260608082811.ED1481F00893@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260608081721.82846-2-dennylin0707@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Low] `iris_disable_power_domains()` incorrectly propagates `1` on success when the device is already suspended.
--
commit 7b8fb44887231870efc4a92ebbb558afa99135b1
Author: Hungyu Lin <dennylin0707@gmail.com>
media: qcom: iris: fix runtime PM reference leaks
This commit uses pm_runtime_resume_and_get() in iris_enable_power_domains()
to prevent reference leaks on failure. It also updates
iris_disable_power_domains() to always call pm_runtime_put_sync() and capture
its result.
> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/qcom/iris/iris_resources.c b/drivers/media/platform/qcom/iris/iris_resources.c
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/qcom/iris/iris_resources.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/qcom/iris/iris_resources.c
[ ... ]
> int iris_disable_power_domains(struct iris_core *core, struct device *pd_dev)
> {
> int ret;
> + int pm_ret;
>
> ret = iris_opp_set_rate(core->dev, 0);
> - if (ret)
> - return ret;
>
> - pm_runtime_put_sync(pd_dev);
> + pm_ret = pm_runtime_put_sync(pd_dev);
> + if (!ret)
> + ret = pm_ret;
>
> - return 0;
> + return ret;
> }
[Severity: Low]
Is it intentional to propagate a positive return value here?
According to the runtime PM API, pm_runtime_put_sync() returns 1 as a success
case when the device usage count drops to zero but it is already in the
RPM_SUSPENDED state.
By capturing and returning this value directly from
iris_disable_power_domains(), the function will return 1 instead of 0 on a
successful suspend. While current callers may ignore the return value, future
callers checking if (ret) could incorrectly treat this normal success case as
a failure.
Would it be safer to normalize positive return values to 0?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260608081721.82846-1-dennylin0707@gmail.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-08 8:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-08 8:17 [PATCH v5 0/2] media: qcom: iris: fix runtime PM error handling Hungyu Lin
2026-06-08 8:17 ` [PATCH v5 1/2] media: qcom: iris: fix runtime PM reference leaks Hungyu Lin
2026-06-08 8:28 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-08 8:17 ` [PATCH v5 2/2] media: qcom: iris: rollback OPP vote on PM resume failure Hungyu Lin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260608082811.ED1481F00893@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=dennylin0707@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.