From: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>,
Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
Quentin Monnet <qmo@kernel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-patches-bot@fb.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v5 6/9] selftests/bpf: Add tests to verify global percpu data
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2026 22:51:10 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260608145113.65857-7-leon.hwang@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260608145113.65857-1-leon.hwang@linux.dev>
If the arch, like s390x, does not support percpu insn, these cases won't
test global percpu data by checking FEAT_PERCPU_DATA support.
The following APIs have been tested for global percpu data:
1. bpf_map__set_initial_value()
2. bpf_map__initial_value()
3. generated percpu struct pointer pointing to internal map's mmaped data
4. bpf_map__lookup_elem() for global percpu data map
At the same time, the case is also tested with 'bpftool gen skeleton -L'.
Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile | 2 +-
.../bpf/prog_tests/global_data_init.c | 196 ++++++++++++++++++
.../bpf/progs/test_global_percpu_data.c | 31 +++
3 files changed, 228 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_global_percpu_data.c
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
index d53b7e496ac9..d21064cfc066 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
@@ -526,7 +526,7 @@ LSKELS_SIGNED := fentry_test.c fexit_test.c atomics.c
# Generate both light skeleton and libbpf skeleton for these
LSKELS_EXTRA := test_ksyms_module.c test_ksyms_weak.c kfunc_call_test.c \
- kfunc_call_test_subprog.c
+ kfunc_call_test_subprog.c test_global_percpu_data.c
SKEL_BLACKLIST += $$(LSKELS) $$(LSKELS_SIGNED)
test_static_linked.skel.h-deps := test_static_linked1.bpf.o test_static_linked2.bpf.o
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/global_data_init.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/global_data_init.c
index 8466332d7406..5abdb0b8b8b3 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/global_data_init.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/global_data_init.c
@@ -1,5 +1,8 @@
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
#include <test_progs.h>
+#include "bpf/libbpf_internal.h"
+#include "test_global_percpu_data.skel.h"
+#include "test_global_percpu_data.lskel.h"
void test_global_data_init(void)
{
@@ -60,3 +63,196 @@ void test_global_data_init(void)
free(newval);
bpf_object__close(obj);
}
+
+static void test_global_percpu_data_init(void)
+{
+ struct test_global_percpu_data__percpu *init_data, *data = NULL;
+ struct test_global_percpu_data__percpu init_value = {};
+ int key, prog_fd, err, num_cpus, num_online, i;
+ struct test_global_percpu_data *skel = NULL;
+ __u64 args[2] = {0x1234ULL, 0x5678ULL};
+ size_t elem_sz, init_data_sz;
+ struct bpf_map *map;
+ bool *online;
+ LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_test_run_opts, topts,
+ .ctx_in = args,
+ .ctx_size_in = sizeof(args),
+ .flags = BPF_F_TEST_RUN_ON_CPU,
+ );
+
+ num_cpus = libbpf_num_possible_cpus();
+ if (!ASSERT_GT(num_cpus, 0, "libbpf_num_possible_cpus"))
+ return;
+
+ err = parse_cpu_mask_file("/sys/devices/system/cpu/online", &online, &num_online);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "parse_cpu_mask_file"))
+ return;
+
+ elem_sz = roundup(sizeof(*data), 8);
+ data = calloc(1, elem_sz);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(data, "calloc data"))
+ goto out;
+
+ skel = test_global_percpu_data__open();
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "test_global_percpu_data__open"))
+ goto out;
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel->percpu, "skel->percpu"))
+ goto out;
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->percpu->data, -1, "skel->percpu->data");
+ ASSERT_FALSE(skel->percpu->run, "skel->percpu->run");
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->percpu->nums[6], 0, "skel->percpu->nums[6]");
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->percpu->struct_data.i, -1, "struct_data.i");
+ ASSERT_FALSE(skel->percpu->struct_data.set, "struct_data.set");
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->percpu->struct_data.nums[6], 0, "struct_data.nums[6]");
+
+ map = skel->maps.percpu;
+ if (!ASSERT_EQ(bpf_map__type(map), BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_ARRAY, "bpf_map__type"))
+ goto out;
+
+ init_value.data = 2;
+ init_value.nums[6] = -1;
+ init_value.struct_data.i = 2;
+ init_value.struct_data.nums[6] = -1;
+ err = bpf_map__set_initial_value(map, &init_value, sizeof(init_value));
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_map__set_initial_value"))
+ goto out;
+
+ init_data = bpf_map__initial_value(map, &init_data_sz);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(init_data, "bpf_map__initial_value"))
+ goto out;
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(init_data->data, init_value.data, "init_value data");
+ ASSERT_EQ(init_data->run, init_value.run, "init_value run");
+ ASSERT_EQ(init_data->struct_data.i, init_value.struct_data.i, "init_value struct_data.i");
+ ASSERT_EQ(init_data->struct_data.nums[6], init_value.struct_data.nums[6],
+ "init_value struct_data.nums[6]");
+ ASSERT_EQ(init_data_sz, sizeof(init_value), "init_value size");
+ ASSERT_EQ((void *) init_data, (void *) skel->percpu, "skel->percpu eq init_data");
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->percpu->data, init_value.data, "skel->percpu->data");
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->percpu->run, init_value.run, "skel->percpu->run");
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->percpu->struct_data.i, init_value.struct_data.i,
+ "skel->percpu->struct_data.i");
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->percpu->struct_data.nums[6], init_value.struct_data.nums[6],
+ "skel->percpu->struct_data.nums[6]");
+
+ err = test_global_percpu_data__load(skel);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "test_global_percpu_data__load"))
+ goto out;
+
+ ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel->percpu, "skel->percpu");
+
+ key = 0;
+ prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.update_percpu_data);
+
+ /* run on every CPU */
+ for (i = 0; i < num_online; i++) {
+ __u64 flags;
+
+ if (!online[i])
+ continue;
+
+ topts.cpu = i;
+ topts.retval = 0;
+ err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(prog_fd, &topts);
+ ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_prog_test_run_opts");
+ ASSERT_EQ(topts.retval, 0, "bpf_prog_test_run_opts retval");
+
+ flags = ((__u64) i << 32) | BPF_F_CPU;
+ err = bpf_map__lookup_elem(map, &key, sizeof(key), data, elem_sz, flags);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_map__lookup_elem"))
+ goto out;
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(data->data, 1, "data->data");
+ ASSERT_TRUE(data->run, "data->run");
+ ASSERT_EQ(data->nums[6], 0xc0de, "data->nums[6]");
+ ASSERT_EQ(data->struct_data.i, 1, "struct_data.i");
+ ASSERT_TRUE(data->struct_data.set, "struct_data.set");
+ ASSERT_EQ(data->struct_data.nums[6], 0xc0de, "struct_data.nums[6]");
+ }
+
+out:
+ test_global_percpu_data__destroy(skel);
+ free(data);
+ free(online);
+}
+
+static void test_global_percpu_data_lskel(void)
+{
+ int key, prog_fd, map_fd, err, num_cpus, num_online, i;
+ struct test_global_percpu_data__percpu *data = NULL;
+ struct test_global_percpu_data_lskel *lskel = NULL;
+ __u64 args[2] = {0x1234ULL, 0x5678ULL};
+ size_t elem_sz;
+ bool *online;
+ LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_test_run_opts, topts,
+ .ctx_in = args,
+ .ctx_size_in = sizeof(args),
+ .flags = BPF_F_TEST_RUN_ON_CPU,
+ );
+
+ num_cpus = libbpf_num_possible_cpus();
+ if (!ASSERT_GT(num_cpus, 0, "libbpf_num_possible_cpus"))
+ return;
+
+ err = parse_cpu_mask_file("/sys/devices/system/cpu/online", &online, &num_online);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "parse_cpu_mask_file"))
+ return;
+
+ elem_sz = roundup(sizeof(*data), 8);
+ data = calloc(1, elem_sz);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(data, "calloc data"))
+ goto out;
+
+ lskel = test_global_percpu_data_lskel__open_and_load();
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(lskel, "test_global_percpu_data_lskel__open_and_load"))
+ goto out;
+
+ key = 0;
+ map_fd = lskel->maps.percpu.map_fd;
+ prog_fd = lskel->progs.update_percpu_data.prog_fd;
+
+ /* run on every CPU */
+ for (i = 0; i < num_online; i++) {
+ __u64 flags;
+
+ if (!online[i])
+ continue;
+
+ topts.cpu = i;
+ topts.retval = 0;
+ err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(prog_fd, &topts);
+ ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_prog_test_run_opts");
+ ASSERT_EQ(topts.retval, 0, "bpf_prog_test_run_opts retval");
+
+ flags = ((__u64) i << 32) | BPF_F_CPU;
+ err = bpf_map_lookup_elem_flags(map_fd, &key, data, flags);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_map_lookup_elem_flags"))
+ goto out;
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(data->data, 1, "data->data");
+ ASSERT_TRUE(data->run, "data->run");
+ ASSERT_EQ(data->nums[6], 0xc0de, "data->nums[6]");
+ ASSERT_EQ(data->struct_data.i, 1, "struct_data.i");
+ ASSERT_TRUE(data->struct_data.set, "struct_data.set");
+ ASSERT_EQ(data->struct_data.nums[6], 0xc0de, "struct_data.nums[6]");
+ }
+
+out:
+ test_global_percpu_data_lskel__destroy(lskel);
+ free(data);
+ free(online);
+}
+
+void test_global_percpu_data(void)
+{
+ if (!feat_supported(NULL, FEAT_PERCPU_DATA)) {
+ test__skip();
+ return;
+ }
+
+ if (test__start_subtest("init"))
+ test_global_percpu_data_init();
+ if (test__start_subtest("lskel"))
+ test_global_percpu_data_lskel();
+}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_global_percpu_data.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_global_percpu_data.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..ba92ffb0ca49
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_global_percpu_data.c
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+#include <vmlinux.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+#include "bpf_misc.h"
+
+int data SEC(".percpu") = -1;
+int nums[7] SEC(".percpu");
+char run SEC(".percpu") = 0;
+struct {
+ char set;
+ int i;
+ int nums[7];
+} struct_data SEC(".percpu") = {
+ .set = 0,
+ .i = -1,
+};
+
+SEC("raw_tp/task_rename")
+__auxiliary
+int update_percpu_data(void *ctx)
+{
+ struct_data.nums[6] = 0xc0de;
+ struct_data.set = 1;
+ struct_data.i = 1;
+ nums[6] = 0xc0de;
+ data = 1;
+ run = 1;
+ return 0;
+}
+
+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
--
2.54.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-08 14:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-08 14:51 [PATCH bpf-next v5 0/9] bpf: Introduce global percpu data Leon Hwang
2026-06-08 14:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 1/9] bpf: Drop duplicate blank lines in verifier Leon Hwang
2026-06-08 14:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 2/9] bpf: Introduce global percpu data Leon Hwang
2026-06-08 15:13 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-08 15:56 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-06-08 14:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 3/9] libbpf: Probe percpu data feature Leon Hwang
2026-06-08 15:05 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-08 14:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 4/9] libbpf: Add support for global percpu data Leon Hwang
2026-06-08 14:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 5/9] bpftool: Generate skeleton " Leon Hwang
2026-06-08 15:11 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-08 15:29 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-06-08 14:51 ` Leon Hwang [this message]
2026-06-08 15:20 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 6/9] selftests/bpf: Add tests to verify " sashiko-bot
2026-06-08 14:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 7/9] selftests/bpf: Add tests to verify verifier log for " Leon Hwang
2026-06-08 15:22 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-08 14:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 8/9] selftests/bpf: Add test to verify xlated insns " Leon Hwang
2026-06-08 15:21 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-08 14:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 9/9] selftests/bpf: Add test to verify bpf_iter " Leon Hwang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260608145113.65857-7-leon.hwang@linux.dev \
--to=leon.hwang@linux.dev \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-patches-bot@fb.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=qmo@kernel.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.