From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "David Woodhouse" <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 04/34] KVM: x86: Add KVM_[GS]ET_CLOCK_GUEST for accurate KVM clock migration
Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2026 15:33:58 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260608153358.DACED1F00893@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260608145455.89187-5-dwmw2@infradead.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 3 potential issue(s) to consider:
New issues:
- [High] Unbounded bitwise shift in `hvclock_to_hz()` triggered by user-controlled input can cause Undefined Behavior (shift out-of-bounds) and a kernel panic (DoS).
- [Low] The KVM_[GS]ET_CLOCK_GUEST ioctls cause compilation failures in userspace due to an incomplete type in the generic UAPI header.
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Race condition in `kvm_guest_time_update` reads `kvmclock_offset` unsynchronized, leading to corrupt guest `system_time`.
--
commit fdd3f3e2e20605997654a24ac2e941cc677cf87b
Author: Jack Allister <jalliste@amazon.com>
KVM: x86: Add KVM_[GS]ET_CLOCK_GUEST for accurate KVM clock migration
This commit adds per-vCPU ioctls (KVM_GET_CLOCK_GUEST and KVM_SET_CLOCK_GUEST)
to allow userspace to precisely save and restore the arithmetic relationship
between the guest TSC and the KVM clock across live migrations.
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index d9ef165df6a14..b7e5f6e3dc6c1 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
[ ... ]
> +static u64 hvclock_to_hz(u32 mul, s8 shift)
> +{
> + u64 tm = NSEC_PER_SEC << 32;
> +
> + /* Maximise precision. Shift right until the top bit is set */
> + tm <<= 2;
> + shift += 2;
> +
> + /* While 'mul' is even, increase the shift *after* the division */
> + while (!(mul & 1)) {
> + shift++;
> + mul >>= 1;
> + }
> +
> + tm /= mul;
> +
> + if (shift > 0)
> + return tm >> shift;
[Severity: High]
Can this result in an undefined bitwise shift? If userspace provides a
tsc_shift of 32 and a tsc_to_system_mul with 31 trailing zeroes (like
0x80000000), the loop will increment the shift 31 times. This results in a
total shift amount of 65. Since tm is a 64-bit integer, shifting it by 65
bits triggers undefined behavior. Does the validation in
kvm_vcpu_ioctl_set_clock_guest() need to enforce a limit on the combined
shift amount?
> + else
> + return tm << -shift;
> +}
[ ... ]
> +static int kvm_vcpu_ioctl_set_clock_guest(struct kvm_vcpu *v, void __user *argp)
> +{
[ ... ]
> + /*
> + * Calculate the guest TSC at the new reference point, and the
> + * corresponding KVM clock value according to user_hv_clock.
> + * Adjust kvmclock_offset so both definitions agree.
> + */
> + guest_tsc = kvm_read_l1_tsc(v, ka->master_cycle_now);
> + user_clk_ns = __pvclock_read_cycles(&user_hv_clock, guest_tsc);
> + ka->kvmclock_offset = user_clk_ns - ka->master_kernel_ns;
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but is it possible for concurrent updates to
cause a torn read in kvm_guest_time_update() now that this ioctl modifies
kvmclock_offset?
In kvm_guest_time_update(), master_kernel_ns is read safely inside the
pvclock_sc seqcount loop, but kvmclock_offset is read outside of it:
kvm_guest_time_update() {
do {
seq = read_seqcount_begin(&ka->pvclock_sc);
...
master_kernel_ns = ka->master_kernel_ns;
} while (read_seqcount_retry(&ka->pvclock_sc, seq));
...
hv_clock.system_time = kernel_ns + v->kvm->arch.kvmclock_offset;
}
If kvm_vcpu_ioctl_set_clock_guest() modifies both variables under the seqcount
write lock after the reader finishes the loop but before reading
kvmclock_offset, couldn't the guest receive a stale kernel_ns combined with a
new kvmclock_offset?
> +
> +out:
> + kvm_end_pvclock_update(kvm);
> + return rc;
> +}
[ ... ]
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
> index 6c8afa2047bf3..9b50191b859cd 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
> @@ -1669,4 +1669,7 @@ struct kvm_pre_fault_memory {
> __u64 padding[5];
> };
>
> +#define KVM_SET_CLOCK_GUEST _IOW(KVMIO, 0xd6, struct pvclock_vcpu_time_info)
> +#define KVM_GET_CLOCK_GUEST _IOR(KVMIO, 0xd7, struct pvclock_vcpu_time_info)
> +
[Severity: Low]
Does this cause compilation failures for userspace applications? The ioctls
use struct pvclock_vcpu_time_info which is defined in asm/pvclock-abi.h, but
that header is not included by linux/kvm.h. Since UAPI headers should be
self-contained, could this result in an 'invalid application of sizeof to
incomplete type' error?
> #endif /* __LINUX_KVM_H */
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260608145455.89187-1-dwmw2@infradead.org?part=4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-08 15:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-08 14:47 [PATCH v5 00/34] Cleaning up the KVM clock mess David Woodhouse
2026-06-08 14:47 ` [PATCH v5 01/34] KVM: x86/xen: Do not corrupt KVM clock in kvm_xen_shared_info_init() David Woodhouse
2026-06-08 14:47 ` [PATCH v5 02/34] KVM: x86: Improve accuracy of KVM clock when TSC scaling is in force David Woodhouse
2026-06-08 14:47 ` [PATCH v5 03/34] UAPI: x86: Move pvclock-abi to UAPI for x86 platforms David Woodhouse
2026-06-08 14:47 ` [PATCH v5 04/34] KVM: x86: Add KVM_[GS]ET_CLOCK_GUEST for accurate KVM clock migration David Woodhouse
2026-06-08 15:33 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-08 14:47 ` [PATCH v5 05/34] KVM: selftests: Add KVM/PV clock selftest to prove timer correction David Woodhouse
2026-06-08 15:49 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-08 14:47 ` [PATCH v5 06/34] KVM: x86: Explicitly disable TSC scaling without CONSTANT_TSC David Woodhouse
2026-06-08 14:47 ` [PATCH v5 07/34] KVM: x86: Activate master clock immediately on vCPU creation David Woodhouse
2026-06-08 16:27 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-08 23:29 ` David Woodhouse
2026-06-08 14:47 ` [PATCH v5 08/34] KVM: x86: Add KVM_VCPU_TSC_SCALE and fix the documentation on TSC migration David Woodhouse
2026-06-08 16:39 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-08 14:47 ` [PATCH v5 09/34] KVM: x86: Avoid NTP frequency skew for KVM clock on 32-bit host David Woodhouse
2026-06-08 14:47 ` [PATCH v5 10/34] KVM: x86: Fold __get_kvmclock() into get_kvmclock() David Woodhouse
2026-06-08 14:47 ` [PATCH v5 11/34] KVM: x86: Restructure get_kvmclock() David Woodhouse
2026-06-08 14:47 ` [PATCH v5 12/34] KVM: x86: Fix KVM clock precision in get_kvmclock() with TSC scaling David Woodhouse
2026-06-08 17:39 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-08 23:43 ` David Woodhouse
2026-06-08 14:47 ` [PATCH v5 13/34] KVM: x86: Use get_kvmclock() in kvm_get_wall_clock_epoch() David Woodhouse
2026-06-08 14:47 ` [PATCH v5 14/34] KVM: x86: Fix compute_guest_tsc() to handle negative time deltas David Woodhouse
2026-06-08 17:59 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-09 0:02 ` David Woodhouse
2026-06-08 14:47 ` [PATCH v5 15/34] KVM: x86: Restructure kvm_guest_time_update() for TSC upscaling David Woodhouse
2026-06-08 18:13 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-08 14:47 ` [PATCH v5 16/34] KVM: x86: Simplify and comment kvm_get_time_scale() David Woodhouse
2026-06-08 14:47 ` [PATCH v5 17/34] KVM: x86: Remove implicit rdtsc() from kvm_compute_l1_tsc_offset() David Woodhouse
2026-06-08 14:47 ` [PATCH v5 18/34] KVM: x86: Improve synchronization in kvm_synchronize_tsc() David Woodhouse
2026-06-08 18:39 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-09 0:14 ` David Woodhouse
2026-06-08 14:48 ` [PATCH v5 19/34] KVM: x86: Kill last_tsc_{nsec,write,offset} fields David Woodhouse
2026-06-08 18:53 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-09 0:34 ` David Woodhouse
2026-06-08 14:48 ` [PATCH v5 20/34] KVM: x86: Replace nr_vcpus_matched_tsc count with all_vcpus_matched_tsc bool David Woodhouse
2026-06-08 14:48 ` [PATCH v5 21/34] KVM: x86: Allow KVM master clock mode when TSCs are offset from each other David Woodhouse
2026-06-08 19:15 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-08 14:48 ` [PATCH v5 22/34] KVM: selftests: Add master clock offset test David Woodhouse
2026-06-08 19:26 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-09 0:50 ` David Woodhouse
2026-06-08 14:48 ` [PATCH v5 23/34] KVM: x86: Factor out kvm_use_master_clock() David Woodhouse
2026-06-08 14:48 ` [PATCH v5 24/34] KVM: x86: Avoid gratuitous global clock updates David Woodhouse
2026-06-08 14:48 ` [PATCH v5 25/34] KVM: x86/xen: Prevent runstate times from becoming negative David Woodhouse
2026-06-08 19:58 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-09 1:02 ` David Woodhouse
2026-06-08 14:48 ` [PATCH v5 26/34] KVM: x86: Avoid redundant masterclock updates from multiple vCPUs David Woodhouse
2026-06-08 20:11 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-09 1:34 ` David Woodhouse
2026-06-08 14:48 ` [PATCH v5 27/34] KVM: x86: Remove runtime Xen TSC frequency CPUID update David Woodhouse
2026-06-08 14:48 ` [PATCH v5 28/34] KVM: selftests: Add Xen/generic CPUID timing leaf test David Woodhouse
2026-06-09 0:27 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-08 14:48 ` [PATCH v5 29/34] KVM: x86: Re-synchronize TSC after KVM_SET_TSC_KHZ David Woodhouse
2026-06-09 0:37 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-08 14:48 ` [PATCH v5 30/34] KVM: selftests: Add Xen runstate migration test David Woodhouse
2026-06-09 0:50 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-08 14:48 ` [PATCH v5 31/34] KVM: x86: Use ktime_get_snapshot_id() for master clock David Woodhouse
2026-06-09 1:03 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-08 14:48 ` [PATCH v5 32/34] KVM: x86: Compute kvmclock base without pvclock_gtod_data David Woodhouse
2026-06-08 14:48 ` [PATCH v5 33/34] KVM: x86: Replace pvclock_gtod_data vclock_mode with boolean David Woodhouse
2026-06-09 1:23 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-08 14:48 ` [PATCH v5 34/34] KVM: x86: Remove pvclock_gtod_data and private timekeeping code David Woodhouse
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260608153358.DACED1F00893@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.