From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: mm-commits@vger.kernel.org,ziy@nvidia.com,vbabka@kernel.org,surenb@google.com,mhocko@suse.com,jackmanb@google.com,hannes@cmpxchg.org,jp.kobryn@linux.dev,akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: [merged mm-stable] mm-compaction-cap-compact_gap-at-compact_cluster_max.patch removed from -mm tree
Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2026 18:22:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260609012255.529FA1F00893@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
The quilt patch titled
Subject: mm/compaction: cap compact_gap() at COMPACT_CLUSTER_MAX
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
mm-compaction-cap-compact_gap-at-compact_cluster_max.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into the mm-stable branch
of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
------------------------------------------------------
From: "JP Kobryn" <jp.kobryn@linux.dev>
Subject: mm/compaction: cap compact_gap() at COMPACT_CLUSTER_MAX
Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2026 23:17:25 -0700
compact_gap() returns 2 << order, which is used as watermark headroom in
__compaction_suitable() and as a threshold in kswapd reclaim decisions.
The computed value scales exponentially by order. For order-9 THP
allocations this evaluates to 1024 pages, but the compaction free
scanner's working set is bounded by COMPACT_CLUSTER_MAX (32 pages). The
scanner stops isolating free pages once it matches the migration batch.
The current gap over-reserves by 32x.
On fragmented production hosts, kswapd will try to reclaim up to the gap,
but it only reaches that threshold in 18% of attempts. As a result,
reclaim continues in the majority of cases despite many lower-order free
pages being available. The over-sized gap also causes 46% of order-9
compaction suitability checks to fail unnecessarily: the zone has
sufficient free pages for the scanner to operate, but not enough to clear
the inflated threshold.
Cap compact_gap() at COMPACT_CLUSTER_MAX so the watermark headroom
reflects the scanner's actual capacity. This function is used by two key
heuristics. The first is when kswapd can stop high-order reclaim and
downgrade to order-0 balancing, allowing kcompactd to be woken for the
original higher allocation order. The second is zone suitability
checking, where the smaller gap allows compaction to start sooner.
Note that orders 0-4 are unaffected since their gap is already less than
or equal to COMPACT_CLUSTER_MAX.
A/B test on v6.13-based instagram production hosts (64GB, 60s
measurement):
Unpatched (43 hosts)
pgscan_kswapd (mean/host): ~1.6M
reclaim efficiency (steal/scan): 83.8%
per-compaction success (success/stall): 2.1%
THP success (alloc/alloc+fallback): 4.9%
forced lru_add_drain (mean/host): ~107K
Patched (59 hosts)
pgscan_kswapd (mean/host): ~449K
reclaim efficiency (steal/scan): 91.0%
per-compaction success (success/stall): 28.3%
THP success (alloc/alloc+fallback): 17.2%
forced lru_add_drain (mean/host): ~64K
Additional tests were also performed using a workload of similar shape and
based on mm-new at the time of testing. Across three 60s runs, the patch
showed improvements consistent with the previous test: reduced kswapd
reclaim and fewer THP fault fallbacks.
Unpatched
kswapd_shrink_node downgrade to order-0 (mean): 0
thp_fault_fallback (mean): 1217
pgscan_kswapd (mean): 6328
pgsteal_kswapd (mean): 5657
Patched
kswapd_shrink_node downgrade to order-0 (mean): 28
thp_fault_fallback (mean): 738
pgscan_kswapd (mean): 3773
pgsteal_kswapd (mean): 3243
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20260604061725.13800-1-jp.kobryn@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: JP Kobryn (Meta) <jp.kobryn@linux.dev>
Reviewed-by: Vlastimil Babka (SUSE) <vbabka@kernel.org>
Cc: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
include/linux/compaction.h | 8 ++++----
mm/vmscan.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
--- a/include/linux/compaction.h~mm-compaction-cap-compact_gap-at-compact_cluster_max
+++ a/include/linux/compaction.h
@@ -2,6 +2,8 @@
#ifndef _LINUX_COMPACTION_H
#define _LINUX_COMPACTION_H
+#include <linux/swap.h>
+
/*
* Determines how hard direct compaction should try to succeed.
* Lower value means higher priority, analogically to reclaim priority.
@@ -73,11 +75,9 @@ static inline unsigned long compact_gap(
* effectively limited by COMPACT_CLUSTER_MAX, as that's the maximum
* that the migrate scanner can have isolated on migrate list, and free
* scanner is only invoked when the number of isolated free pages is
- * lower than that. But it's not worth to complicate the formula here
- * as a bigger gap for higher orders than strictly necessary can also
- * improve chances of compaction success.
+ * lower than that.
*/
- return 2UL << order;
+ return min(2UL << order, COMPACT_CLUSTER_MAX);
}
static inline int current_is_kcompactd(void)
--- a/mm/vmscan.c~mm-compaction-cap-compact_gap-at-compact_cluster_max
+++ a/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -7014,7 +7014,7 @@ static bool kswapd_shrink_node(pg_data_t
/*
* Fragmentation may mean that the system cannot be rebalanced for
- * high-order allocations. If twice the allocation size has been
+ * high-order allocations. If at least the compaction gap has been
* reclaimed then recheck watermarks only at order-0 to prevent
* excessive reclaim. Assume that a process requested a high-order
* can direct reclaim/compact.
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from jp.kobryn@linux.dev are
reply other threads:[~2026-06-09 1:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260609012255.529FA1F00893@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=jackmanb@google.com \
--cc=jp.kobryn@linux.dev \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.