All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Kaitao Cheng" <kaitao.cheng@linux.dev>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/14] drm/ttm: Open-code reservation list walk
Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2026 06:51:19 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260609065120.74E531F00893@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260609062526.94907-4-kaitao.cheng@linux.dev>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Missing lock release when `dma_resv_reserve_fences()` fails, leaving the current buffer object permanently locked.
--

commit 4a941c2e22e18c4c60dbeb3162fc85117e45e7a8
Author: Kaitao Cheng <chengkaitao@kylinos.cn>

drm/ttm: Open-code reservation list walk

This patch modifies ttm_eu_reserve_buffers() to open-code the
list_for_each_entry() loop. This prepares the code for future list iterator
updates while preserving the existing traversal semantics where the cursor
can be rewound during duplicate handling.

> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_execbuf_util.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_execbuf_util.c
> index bc7a83a9fe443..8072f07d55579 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_execbuf_util.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_execbuf_util.c
> @@ -86,7 +86,9 @@ int ttm_eu_reserve_buffers(struct ww_acquire_ctx *ticket,
>  	if (ticket)
>  		ww_acquire_init(ticket, &reservation_ww_class);
>  
> -	list_for_each_entry(entry, list, head) {
> +	for (entry = list_first_entry(list, typeof(*entry), head);
> +	     !list_entry_is_head(entry, list, head);
> +	     entry = list_next_entry(entry, head)) {

[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does the error path in this loop leak
the lock on entry->bo when dma_resv_reserve_fences() fails?

If ttm_bo_reserve() successfully acquires the lock on the current entry->bo,
and then dma_resv_reserve_fences() fails (for example, returning -ENOMEM),
the code cleans up using ttm_eu_backoff_reservation_reverse():

ttm_eu_reserve_buffers() {
    ...
    if (!ret) {
        ret = dma_resv_reserve_fences(bo->base.resv, num_fences);
        if (!ret)
            continue;
    }

    /* uh oh, we lost out, drop every reservation and try... */
    ttm_eu_backoff_reservation_reverse(list, entry);
    ...
}

However, ttm_eu_backoff_reservation_reverse() explicitly skips unlocking the
current entry itself because it uses list_for_each_entry_continue_reverse().

The code then bypasses the slowpath because ret is -ENOMEM (not -EDEADLK)
and returns without unlocking entry->bo:

ttm_eu_reserve_buffers() {
    ...
    if (ret == -EDEADLK) {
        ret = ttm_bo_reserve_slowpath(bo, intr, ticket);
    }
    ...
    if (unlikely(ret != 0)) {
        if (ticket) {
            ww_acquire_done(ticket);
            ww_acquire_fini(ticket);
        }
        return ret;
    }
    ...
}

Could this sequence leave the ww_mutex for entry->bo permanently locked?

>  		struct ttm_buffer_object *bo = entry->bo;
>  		unsigned int num_fences;
>

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260609064122.95825-1-kaitao.cheng@linux.dev?part=6

  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-09  6:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-09  6:13 [PATCH v2 00/14] list: Prepare entry iterators to cache cursor state Kaitao Cheng
2026-06-09  6:13 ` [PATCH v2 01/14] drbd: Open-code transfer log list walk Kaitao Cheng
2026-06-09  6:53   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-09  6:13 ` [PATCH v2 02/14] firewire: core: Open-code topology " Kaitao Cheng
2026-06-09  6:53   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-09  6:25 ` [PATCH v2 03/14] drm/bridge: Open-code bridge chain list walks Kaitao Cheng
2026-06-09  6:25   ` [PATCH v2 04/14] drm/i915/gt: Open-code active timeline walk Kaitao Cheng
2026-06-09  7:00     ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-06-09  6:25   ` [PATCH v2 05/14] drm/i915: Open-code DFS dependency list walk Kaitao Cheng
2026-06-09  6:25   ` [PATCH v2 06/14] drm/ttm: Open-code reservation " Kaitao Cheng
2026-06-09  6:51     ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-09  6:25   ` [PATCH v2 07/14] spi: fsi: Open-code message transfer walk Kaitao Cheng
2026-06-09  7:02     ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-06-09  6:25   ` [PATCH v2 08/14] spi: stm32-ospi: " Kaitao Cheng
2026-06-09  6:57     ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-09  6:25   ` [PATCH v2 09/14] spi: stm32-qspi: " Kaitao Cheng
2026-06-09  6:55     ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-09  6:38 ` [PATCH v2 10/14] spi: tegra210-quad: " Kaitao Cheng
2026-06-09  6:38   ` [PATCH v2 11/14] locking/locktorture: Open-code ww mutex list walk Kaitao Cheng
2026-06-09  6:54     ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-09  6:38   ` [PATCH v2 12/14] locking/ww_mutex: Open-code stress reorder " Kaitao Cheng
2026-06-09  6:57   ` [PATCH v2 10/14] spi: tegra210-quad: Open-code message transfer walk sashiko-bot
2026-06-09  6:41 ` [PATCH v2 13/14] ASoC: dapm: Open-code widget invalidation walk Kaitao Cheng
2026-06-09  6:41   ` [PATCH v2 14/14] list: Cache cursors in entry iterators Kaitao Cheng
2026-06-09  6:59     ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-09  6:55   ` [PATCH v2 13/14] ASoC: dapm: Open-code widget invalidation walk sashiko-bot
2026-06-09  6:47 ` [PATCH v2 00/14] list: Prepare entry iterators to cache cursor state Andy Shevchenko
2026-06-09  7:05   ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-06-09 10:33 ` Christian König

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260609065120.74E531F00893@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=kaitao.cheng@linux.dev \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.