All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Usama Arif <usama.arif@linux.dev>
To: "Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)" <vbabka@kernel.org>
Cc: Usama Arif <usama.arif@linux.dev>, Harry Yoo <harry@kernel.org>,
	hao.ge@linux.dev, Hao Li <hao.li@linux.dev>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@gentwo.org>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
	Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
	Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>,
	Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
	Marco Elver <elver@google.com>,
	Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
	kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 00/15] mm/slab: introduce alloc_flags and slab_alloc_context
Date: Tue,  9 Jun 2026 06:35:33 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260609133534.3548059-1-usama.arif@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260609-slab_alloc_flags-v1-0-2bf4a4b9b526@kernel.org>

On Tue, 09 Jun 2026 11:17:45 +0200 "Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)" <vbabka@kernel.org> wrote:

> This series is based on slab/for-next. If all goes well, it would
> hopefully go to slab/for-next soon after the 7.2 merge window, so any
> other work can be based on it to avoid conflicts, as it touches a lot
> parts of slab.
> 
> Git: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vbabka/linux.git/log/?h=b4/slab_alloc_flags
> 
> The slab implementation currently relies on gfp flags to convey
> some context information internally:
> 
> - The absence of both __GFP_RECLAIM flags is interpreted as "cannot spin
>   on locks", and intended to be used by kmalloc_nolock(). But false
>   positives are possible e.g. during early boot where gfp_allowed_mask
>   clears __GFP_RECLAIM from all allocations. This leads to unnecessary
>   allocation failures and workarounds such as fd3634312a04 ("debugobject:
>   Make it work with deferred page initialization - again").
> 
> - __GFP_NO_OBJ_EXT exists and takes up valuable bit in the gfp flags
>   space, only to prevent recursive kmalloc() allocations for obj_ext
>   arrays and sheaves.
> 

Hello Valstimil!

I think memory allocation profiling uses __GFP_NO_OBJ_EXT, and I dont see
it being removed in the series (hopefully I didnt miss it).

Adding Hao Ge in CC who did this in the commit:
mm/alloc_tag: replace fixed-size early PFN array with dynamic linked list


> The page allocator uses its internal alloc_flags to convey various
> context information, including ALLOC_TRYLOCK (meaning "cannot spin").
> This series copies that concept for the slab allocator, with its own
> slab-specific internal flags:
> 
> - SLAB_ALLOC_DEFAULT - no extra flags (the value is 0), but explicit
> - SLAB_ALLOC_TRYLOCK - do not spin on locks (used by kmalloc_nolock())
> - SLAB_ALLOC_NEW_SLAB - replacing existing 'bool new_slab' parameter
> 			for allocating obj_ext arrays
> - SLAB_ALLOC_NO_RECURSE - replacing usage of __GFP_NO_OBJ_EXT
> 
> To reduce the amount of parameters in various internal functions, we
> additionally introduce slab_alloc_context (also inspired by page
> allocator's alloc_context) for passing a number of existing arguments
> and the new alloc_flags:
> 
> /* Structure holding extra parameters for slab allocations */
> struct slab_alloc_context {
> 	unsigned long caller_addr;
> 	unsigned long orig_size;
> 	unsigned int alloc_flags;
> 	struct list_lru *lru;
> };
> 
> This also replaces the existing struct partial_context.
> 
> The last necessary piece is kmalloc_flags() which can take the
> alloc_flags in addition to gfp flags and is intended for the recursive
> allocations of sheaves and obj_ext arrays, so that both
> SLAB_ALLOC_TRYLOCK and SLAB_ALLOC_NO_RECURSE can be communicated.
> Internally it decides between kmalloc_nolock() and normal kmalloc()
> depending SLAB_ALLOC_TRYLOCK.
> 
> The rest of the series is gradually expanding the usage of both
> alloc_flags and slab_alloc_context as necessary, with bits of
> refactoring. Then, __GFP_NO_OBJ_EXT is removed completely.
> 
> Note that some usage of gfpflags_allow_spinning() relying on absence of
> __GFP_RECLAIM remains outside of slab (and page allocator) in memcg,
> page_owner and stackdepot code. These can thus yield false-positive
> decisions that spinning is not allowed, but should not result in
> important allocations failing anymore.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka (SUSE) <vbabka@kernel.org>
> ---
> Vlastimil Babka (SUSE) (15):
>       mm/slab: always zero only requested size on alloc
>       mm/slab: stop inlining __slab_alloc_node()
>       mm/slab: introduce slab_alloc_context
>       mm/slab: introduce alloc_flags and SLAB_ALLOC_TRYLOCK
>       mm/slab: add alloc_flags to slab_alloc_context
>       mm/slab: replace struct partial_context with slab_alloc_context
>       mm/slab: pass alloc_flags to new slab allocation
>       mm/slab: pass alloc_flags through slab_post_alloc_hook() chain
>       mm/slab: replace slab_alloc_node() parameters with slab_alloc_context
>       mm/slab: allow kmem_cache_alloc_bulk() with any gfp flags
>       mm/slab: pass slab_alloc_context to __do_kmalloc_node()
>       mm/slab: introduce kmalloc_flags()
>       mm/slab: remove __GFP_NO_OBJ_EXT usage from alloc_slab_obj_exts()
>       mm/slab: replace __GFP_NO_OBJ_EXT with SLAB_ALLOC_NO_RECURSE for sheaves
>       mm: remove the __GFP_NO_OBJ_EXT flag
> 
>  include/linux/gfp_types.h       |   7 -
>  include/linux/slab.h            |  14 +-
>  include/trace/events/mmflags.h  |  10 +-
>  lib/alloc_tag.c                 |   2 +-
>  mm/kfence/core.c                |   6 +-
>  mm/memcontrol.c                 |   5 +-
>  mm/slab.h                       |  16 +-
>  mm/slub.c                       | 423 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
>  tools/include/linux/gfp_types.h |   7 -
>  9 files changed, 288 insertions(+), 202 deletions(-)
> ---
> base-commit: 500b2c9755301742bdbb61249511ac11a4665dae
> change-id: 20260601-slab_alloc_flags-25c782b0c57c
> 
> Best regards,
> --  
> Vlastimil Babka (SUSE) <vbabka@kernel.org>
> 
> 


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-06-09 13:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-09  9:17 [PATCH RFC 00/15] mm/slab: introduce alloc_flags and slab_alloc_context Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-06-09  9:17 ` [PATCH RFC 01/15] mm/slab: always zero only requested size on alloc Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-06-09  9:17 ` [PATCH RFC 02/15] mm/slab: stop inlining __slab_alloc_node() Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-06-09  9:17 ` [PATCH RFC 03/15] mm/slab: introduce slab_alloc_context Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-06-09  9:17 ` [PATCH RFC 04/15] mm/slab: introduce alloc_flags and SLAB_ALLOC_TRYLOCK Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-06-09  9:17 ` [PATCH RFC 05/15] mm/slab: add alloc_flags to slab_alloc_context Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-06-09  9:17 ` [PATCH RFC 06/15] mm/slab: replace struct partial_context with slab_alloc_context Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-06-09  9:17 ` [PATCH RFC 07/15] mm/slab: pass alloc_flags to new slab allocation Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-06-09  9:17 ` [PATCH RFC 08/15] mm/slab: pass alloc_flags through slab_post_alloc_hook() chain Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-06-09  9:17 ` [PATCH RFC 09/15] mm/slab: replace slab_alloc_node() parameters with slab_alloc_context Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-06-09  9:17 ` [PATCH RFC 10/15] mm/slab: allow kmem_cache_alloc_bulk() with any gfp flags Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-06-09  9:17 ` [PATCH RFC 11/15] mm/slab: pass slab_alloc_context to __do_kmalloc_node() Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-06-09  9:17 ` [PATCH RFC 12/15] mm/slab: introduce kmalloc_flags() Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-06-09  9:17 ` [PATCH RFC 13/15] mm/slab: remove __GFP_NO_OBJ_EXT usage from alloc_slab_obj_exts() Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-06-09  9:17 ` [PATCH RFC 14/15] mm/slab: replace __GFP_NO_OBJ_EXT with SLAB_ALLOC_NO_RECURSE for sheaves Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-06-09  9:18 ` [PATCH RFC 15/15] mm: remove the __GFP_NO_OBJ_EXT flag Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-06-09 13:35 ` Usama Arif [this message]
2026-06-09 14:28   ` [PATCH RFC 00/15] mm/slab: introduce alloc_flags and slab_alloc_context Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-06-09 18:40 ` Alexei Starovoitov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260609133534.3548059-1-usama.arif@linux.dev \
    --to=usama.arif@linux.dev \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=cl@gentwo.org \
    --cc=dvyukov@google.com \
    --cc=elver@google.com \
    --cc=glider@google.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=hao.ge@linux.dev \
    --cc=hao.li@linux.dev \
    --cc=harry@kernel.org \
    --cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.