Re: [PATCH 0/4] s390: Idle time accounting improvements

[Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>]

On Tue, Jun 09, 2026 at 03:55:57PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> Le Mon, Jun 08, 2026 at 09:55:00AM +0200, Heiko Carstens a écrit :
> > On Wed, May 13, 2026 at 04:01:25PM +0200, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> > > This series is on top of Frederic Weisbecker's idle cpu time accounting
> > > refactor series [1][2].
> > > 
> > > This is supposed to improve s390 idle time accounting, and brings it
> > > back to the state it was before arch_cpu_idle_time() was removed from
> > > s390 [3].
> > > 
> > > In result all cpu time accounting is done by the s390 architecture backend
> > > again, instead of having a mix of architecure specific and common code
> > > accounting (common code: idle, s390 architecture: everything else).
> > 
> > Thomas, Peter, Frederic, any objections to this series? The third patch
> > touches common code, so I'd like to get an ACK for that.
> > 
> > If there is agreement, this could go either via tip tree's timers/nohz branch
> > (series applies cleanly), or via s390, after the nohz branch has been merged
> > upstream.
> 
> Looks all good to me, thanks!
> 
> Acked-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>

Thank you!

> I guess ideally it should go via s390. Any chance you can push this to this
> merge window right after tip:timers/nohz is merged?

Yes, sure.