From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD04226ACC; Wed, 10 Jun 2026 00:17:51 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1781050672; cv=none; b=k9evkQa/2VCuu7kK6dMZkpFM/90Pm+l+XE3B3OGusai8sb+EJw+3pLJoE+0ST9WtVNi/NdTk7XVlLsebuopUNZK2fTYVwnaqTvdg/AdnYbdCL9n6irY5zveXk3BGncDSrk1RP6gQZhYZAfEqDrWEl3MMWGkhJgb6Xo0kgp1+jyw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1781050672; c=relaxed/simple; bh=2X3adUZBt/OsiwFj67H2fjX+z3gaGYoliU4kJoBwcMY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=O7+OJMK0ozv/jQuAdvGM1vSxoFOQx1mePi7hCaTAeO2Vgf3Rl/Oo9Y90JiMVCqK8PTlCvir9s2J42N0/gFDfCdXPTfEeZZ8ci7OqrcInUvmpdFfV7asSlSkzZxul5PDn2r8NojfowZX0daYsx2yztNgNjGxVlz/4njyf2Qb+stE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=mFtZ89aW; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="mFtZ89aW" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0D3991F00893; Wed, 10 Jun 2026 00:17:51 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1781050671; bh=kpEtiFrBEIM+OcxmfyVtuRseNKwhQK6Li7jNDIkmsk4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=mFtZ89aWwYePdEMSZCIYhqOArs44ygPvWB3tdzkh33PvIxn5Aam8KArGCmpQYJplW HK3TYSwyj6Nqzpz/JWe2UWE4n65n/MThJmxsCGFn4Yz8au7hPcaTj5q/6TXHd4101o xtp2nGMRpzqEkkB6785g2Knv4wZz4PI7L0g88up0xmcdA3tyuf6b8Z2OdmlDBftHej U3vxKyg1ajRId2ejVTWRY1/M5g8qcFPR+VjCrSmvBzcLDnh7IrGg/qE9DVqo9XzqHo oRcFiGsy7O/BUyLdAvV6rl8HGAJq6LNbG6QisoQu4CsYbBc8blhbCBtlkPtHxkrNrR wY3sVt13NilkA== Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2026 17:17:50 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: muhammad.nazim.amirul.nazle.asmade@altera.com Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com, mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com, alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com, rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk, maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com, linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: ethtool: mm: Increase FPE verification retry count Message-ID: <20260609171750.7c5709ac@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20260605025631.2872-1-muhammad.nazim.amirul.nazle.asmade@altera.com> References: <20260605025631.2872-1-muhammad.nazim.amirul.nazle.asmade@altera.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 4 Jun 2026 19:56:31 -0700 muhammad.nazim.amirul.nazle.asmade@altera.com wrote: > The current FPE verification retry count is set to 3. However, > the IEEE 802.3br standard does not specify a fixed value for this. > A retry count of 3 may be insufficient when the remote device is > slow to respond during link-up. Increase the retry count to 20 to > improve robustness. You need to CC the author / expert on this code, please repost with the CC fixed. -- pw-bot: cr