From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from phobos.denx.de (phobos.denx.de [85.214.62.61]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 18DEBCD8CB9 for ; Wed, 10 Jun 2026 05:52:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from h2850616.stratoserver.net (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by phobos.denx.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE87280087; Wed, 10 Jun 2026 07:52:10 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=dolcini.it Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=u-boot-bounces@lists.denx.de Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=dolcini.it header.i=@dolcini.it header.b="q/P3h2uc"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by phobos.denx.de (Postfix, from userid 109) id E08B2807C4; Wed, 10 Jun 2026 07:52:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail11.truemail.it (mail11.truemail.it [IPv6:2001:4b7e:0:8::81]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by phobos.denx.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E1A0080086 for ; Wed, 10 Jun 2026 07:52:02 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=dolcini.it Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=francesco@dolcini.it Received: from francesco-nb (unknown [185.12.129.182]) by mail11.truemail.it (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 7414A1FA89; Wed, 10 Jun 2026 07:51:56 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dolcini.it; s=default; t=1781070721; bh=SesNk0p6f1sk474f2OxqlEKMQaMl3aPSIgb/HMOmryc=; h=From:To:Subject; b=q/P3h2ucc+7aqk2MW46Kvyjo8L7Py0fbW93qvoADUN19BGPygO1eH3aPfgnmjT9qn jIvlxuhQD0kr5v4L0TxujYrI9LlW7rKWfMs9A5lgD5ZZoVxVq5a3zsIM3p8AiFRLpB doP6rHcP8JqQKano2j0j5Ps7/VjyUz245UlCR1xOdJmwKcTIKKAgFcWMUMgvMdhz3u FGYvTM8T2vwsEExBcHBxvXbBttoaqjcnbJKltQjkvlHTpdyCiHLpCP2AFMq6l8KBFH El1+kxjPMSttBGgeyPRn98Pe+NmkxK836ebLfBRf3x9Ms14qXyHf/0W3d4uR9uXjWO pbettQ7b/cebA== Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2026 07:51:41 +0200 From: Francesco Dolcini To: Tom Rini , Shiva Tripathi Cc: Francesco Dolcini , Andrew Davis , Ernest Van Hoecke , vigneshr@ti.com, bb@ti.com, u-boot@lists.denx.de, u-kumar1@ti.com, praneeth@ti.com, kamlesh@ti.com, vishalm@ti.com, k-malarvizhi@ti.com, anshuld@ti.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arm: k3: Kconfig: Enable fTPM and RPMB support Message-ID: <20260610055141.GA13255@francesco-nb> References: <20260522061515.GA8642@francesco-nb> <0c76975d-1f87-4a6c-87c2-cff99584fa1e@ti.com> <20260522162048.GA114365@francesco-nb> <20260522173637.GW1858239@bill-the-cat> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260522173637.GW1858239@bill-the-cat> X-BeenThere: u-boot@lists.denx.de X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39 Precedence: list List-Id: U-Boot discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: u-boot-bounces@lists.denx.de Sender: "U-Boot" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.103.8 at phobos.denx.de X-Virus-Status: Clean Hello Shiva, On Fri, May 22, 2026 at 11:36:37AM -0600, Tom Rini wrote: > On Fri, May 22, 2026 at 06:20:48PM +0200, Francesco Dolcini wrote: > > On Fri, May 22, 2026 at 07:49:27PM +0530, Shiva Tripathi wrote: > > > On 5/22/26 11:45, Francesco Dolcini wrote: > > > > On Wed, May 13, 2026 at 06:36:40PM +0530, Shiva Tripathi wrote: > > > > On Wed, May 13, 2026 at 08:49:31AM -0500, Andrew Davis wrote: > > > >> This makes me think we are at the stage in boot where EFI variables > > > >> are trying to be persisted to some media, and when trying to use > > > >> the fTPM for this it fails (as would be expected without RPMB). > > > >> So this should be harmless, but why there is such a large error > > > >> printout we need to investigate and try to make it less verbose. > > > > > > > > Any chance TI can help on this? > > > Yes, I am looking into it. The logs are showing up as OPTEE's fTPM TA is > > > failing to load, since the eMMC RPMB isn't provisioned. > > > > Thanks for looking into that, and I am glad you can reproduce the issue. > > > > > Even though these logs don't affect functionality, you can revert this > > > patch to avoid confusion. I am checking if there's a cleaner way to > > > handle this. > > > > I am using mainline U-Boot, if this needs to be reverted, it must be > > reverted here. Given the release timeline, and the fact that this is not > > breaking the functionality I am fine waiting a little bit to see if it > > is possible to fix it, we have some time before the v2026.07 release. > > And for the release I would like to make sure someone has a clear path > on what changes are needed, if any in the end, on mainline U-Boot by > rc4, which is June 8th. We have the last one on June 22nd but I'd rather > not have to revert then unless things are just unresolved. Thanks! Shiva: what's the plan? As of now the issue is still there. Francesco