From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED7CECD8CB9 for ; Wed, 10 Jun 2026 15:58:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D5E340E03; Wed, 10 Jun 2026 17:58:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-qt1-f169.google.com (mail-qt1-f169.google.com [209.85.160.169]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66D5340DD5 for ; Wed, 10 Jun 2026 17:58:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-qt1-f169.google.com with SMTP id d75a77b69052e-517760dc3c2so42197661cf.3 for ; Wed, 10 Jun 2026 08:58:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=networkplumber-org.20251104.gappssmtp.com; s=20251104; t=1781107082; x=1781711882; darn=dpdk.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=n1LAbZr/+eIQZRS7mEkAziKiqRoCSgpqTT+xNjtPjDk=; b=kmZ8/y+oJM/ChlOIDc96rWUMJ2+h4BHYl22l9FdZxEMps2iG7oZX8AJrTzKRBup6Tg DyXfkAPZKq4ZeUAefe/eQ2HXFS8w4Bg8g3jhWf6gfy18rFy/LYLr6eLUMuenCGh8eZ6L JHg2WyP3hkPBjob13c+CezJgrZqeHdzVg9rEKIYKaxQ5XHpeylSFRC4yRWjfRbM/Sz31 a0/z6d+q83zT89EdtNMhYsvtvdyqxzHju7Earjp+5lelo00ZMn9A74yx5TrDEkFbxUy7 lZylPmAxp+7GQajveZUk+STyI9TAVlzo0yFoo/OiRHrKwzgfzHchzdADRJz0TzBBixRU XAxA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20251104; t=1781107082; x=1781711882; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from :to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=n1LAbZr/+eIQZRS7mEkAziKiqRoCSgpqTT+xNjtPjDk=; b=SqINC7VViLZ8nufEH4sZZ+IgF42V8E9pULNm0foKZhz3FHzFb/tsmDy1IgRQIlSGjN SsWPZuL3rAsT1tF288ZlthLmzfAHRKpqkNnp+zFZA/x/tR/jGhGuFkoT7H73/u8z1TGv NCj2ZLDlZM1GX1vG9lucqmpuJgqu8cnPgmpRraLp+lXQfqvFrkCtgpGseS3t8tgWhGJU hxcmdEjghlSYkbuzx9ANNIh4sgpmz5XpfuQEUhMRfkItiTsCqJrPF05lfsQAxGMTpAQO bP1ir6WqsAHnwDBONNj9zNulUKy9GCroGXiB8MXfmwjmTsU0bSFfhRFALUEXfOev+UvE NWRw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwbFv6aQ2nldrFRv5pL2LqdUrqzFvit3S6BgzEvzeTa2Y512rzk +71uALl+RCEU/kYpQ20tANkU/m/EVlRLkCVbHSUlKdYF6sXFAv4LMVVvaa258kaxurU= X-Gm-Gg: Acq92OGF9MOvlM1FraxfdBAYw1Errz08qaiITwgLkvLHQ2qxkdcZPaRmo6yeKwETowW TmlnBYFnyNcQvaFkGZKFahVNCm7D5BJTU223vW++Ey72Xy4Whs+7dTnsx2WErEvhIkG36AcFSfZ INmvM/G4XNfMfQV+CTnc1+fNZv0bWdZhFaJZUNGw1+hoE4jDE9cbTcSVcYYJZbNQAItHT+HyKsg Fd1INFiUQW8XRoxc6XTthW7Dof2AhxDJSaUyVuI8oxDyF4L3qDTRCU63cQ7DgDuGfYc7LVklUAf QUQySNXBfot5BMHZQ0t2toITk5u6XcyYLbzlKK1D01tSeX3lbs5DxV+SRLw0nqv1QvZAQsfJOvU N7fUjHlRr0YLZmFzLBJODolcAmjRT9NPjbYjI9G6aTMutaAj1nBWCuFjxugYUOi9YUV0B749ukS RRF9Umjx0kCV6jThrcnVKGlRV4EjjMNZguWDCldM005dyhPNLLXOOjq4N9v5smtLPGYOqonS4MQ RCkQFe9zGtWxQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:291:b0:516:ed02:c85a with SMTP id d75a77b69052e-51795be0d00mr377820671cf.32.1781107078595; Wed, 10 Jun 2026 08:57:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from phoenix.local (204-195-96-226.wavecable.com. [204.195.96.226]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d75a77b69052e-51775c08234sm218357451cf.6.2026.06.10.08.57.57 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 10 Jun 2026 08:57:58 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2026 08:57:49 -0700 From: Stephen Hemminger To: fengchengwen Cc: , , Bruce Richardson , Neil Horman , David Marchand Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] eal: add destructor to unregister tailq on unload Message-ID: <20260610085749.7bb0a4f3@phoenix.local> In-Reply-To: References: <20260607150418.30885-1-stephen@networkplumber.org> <20260609142701.163908-1-stephen@networkplumber.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org On Wed, 10 Jun 2026 09:19:42 +0800 fengchengwen wrote: > > > > +RTE_EXPORT_SYMBOL(rte_eal_tailq_unregister) > > this should be with EXPERIMENTAL Not possible, this is part of the EAL_REGISTER_TAILQ macro and usage is under the covers. So if anything was marked experimental it would fail code that did not allow experimental > > > +void > > +rte_eal_tailq_unregister(struct rte_tailq_elem *t) > > +{ > > + TAILQ_REMOVE(&rte_tailq_elem_head, t, next); > > We need first make sure it exist the tailq, just like TAILQ_FOREACH rte_eal_tailq_local_register() Ok cheap scan since not in critical path.