All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Ciprian Regus via B4 Relay"
	<devnull+ciprian.regus.analog.com@kernel.org>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 04/13] net: ethernet: oa_tc6: Export the C45 access functions
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2026 15:28:21 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260610152822.27D341F00893@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260609-adin1140-driver-v4-4-0753e28ee004@analog.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:

New issues:
- [Low] Missing forward declaration of `struct mii_bus` in `include/linux/oa_tc6.h`.

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] A Time-Of-Check to Time-Of-Use race in `oa_tc6_start_xmit` can result in a permanently stopped TX queue.
--

commit 8341f219f15c736a6e2b1b018d43e766db074905
Author: Ciprian Regus <ciprian.regus@analog.com>

net: ethernet: oa_tc6: Export the C45 access functions
    
The C45 access functions can still be used by some Ethernet drivers
which set the OA_TC6_BROKEN_PHY flag. Export them.

Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Signed-off-by: Ciprian Regus <ciprian.regus@analog.com>

> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/oa_tc6.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/oa_tc6.c
> index 2a72f0c4b0095..b37e398e30e37 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/oa_tc6.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/oa_tc6.c

[ ... ]

[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but is there a race condition in
oa_tc6_start_xmit() that can result in a permanently stopped TX queue?

In drivers/net/ethernet/oa_tc6.c:oa_tc6_start_xmit(), tc6->waiting_tx_skb
is checked without holding tx_skb_lock:

    if (tc6->waiting_tx_skb) {
        netif_stop_queue(tc6->netdev);
        return NETDEV_TX_BUSY;
    }

Concurrently, the SPI thread can acquire the lock, move waiting_tx_skb
to ongoing_tx_skb, and set waiting_tx_skb to NULL.

After processing, the SPI thread checks if the queue is stopped to wake
it up in oa_tc6_try_spi_transfer():

    if (!tc6->waiting_tx_skb && netif_queue_stopped(tc6->netdev))
        netif_wake_queue(tc6->netdev);

If the SPI thread evaluates netif_queue_stopped() before oa_tc6_start_xmit()
executes netif_stop_queue(), it won't wake it. oa_tc6_start_xmit() will
then stop the queue and return NETDEV_TX_BUSY. 

With waiting_tx_skb being NULL and the queue stopped, will the SPI thread
fail to wake up to process new TX frames, stalling the interface?

> diff --git a/include/linux/oa_tc6.h b/include/linux/oa_tc6.h
> index 62e3d89f80ed0..2660eefa35043 100644
> --- a/include/linux/oa_tc6.h
> +++ b/include/linux/oa_tc6.h
> @@ -31,3 +31,7 @@ int oa_tc6_read_registers(struct oa_tc6 *tc6, u32 address, u32 value[],
>  			  u8 length);
>  netdev_tx_t oa_tc6_start_xmit(struct oa_tc6 *tc6, struct sk_buff *skb);
>  int oa_tc6_zero_align_receive_frame_enable(struct oa_tc6 *tc6);
> +int oa_tc6_mdiobus_read_c45(struct mii_bus *bus, int addr, int devnum,
> +			    int regnum);
> +int oa_tc6_mdiobus_write_c45(struct mii_bus *bus, int addr, int devnum,
> +			     int regnum, u16 val);

[Severity: Low]
Could this cause a compiler warning due to a missing forward declaration
of struct mii_bus?

Including this header without prior MDIO/PHY declarations being in scope
will generate a warning about the struct being declared inside a parameter
list.

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260609-adin1140-driver-v4-0-0753e28ee004@analog.com?part=4

  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-10 15:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-09 15:27 [PATCH net-next v4 00/13] net: Add ADIN1140 support Ciprian Regus via B4 Relay
2026-06-09 15:27 ` Ciprian Regus
2026-06-09 15:28 ` [PATCH net-next v4 01/13] dt-bindings: net: Add ADIN1140 Ciprian Regus via B4 Relay
2026-06-09 15:28   ` Ciprian Regus
2026-06-09 15:28 ` [PATCH net-next v4 02/13] net: ethernet: oa_tc6: Handle the OA TC6 SPI protected mode Ciprian Regus via B4 Relay
2026-06-09 15:28   ` Ciprian Regus
2026-06-10 15:28   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-09 15:28 ` [PATCH net-next v4 03/13] net: ethernet: oa_tc6: add OA_TC6_BROKEN_PHY quirk flag Ciprian Regus via B4 Relay
2026-06-09 15:28   ` Ciprian Regus
2026-06-10 15:28   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-09 15:28 ` [PATCH net-next v4 04/13] net: ethernet: oa_tc6: Export the C45 access functions Ciprian Regus via B4 Relay
2026-06-09 15:28   ` Ciprian Regus
2026-06-10 15:28   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-09 15:28 ` [PATCH net-next v4 05/13] net: ethernet: oa_tc6: Export standard defined registers Ciprian Regus via B4 Relay
2026-06-09 15:28   ` Ciprian Regus
2026-06-10 15:28   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-09 15:28 ` [PATCH net-next v4 06/13] net: ethernet: oa_tc6: Add the OA_TC6_ prefix to standard registers Ciprian Regus via B4 Relay
2026-06-09 15:28   ` Ciprian Regus
2026-06-10 15:28   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-09 15:28 ` [PATCH net-next v4 07/13] net: ethernet: oa_tc6: Add read_mms/write_mms register access functions Ciprian Regus via B4 Relay
2026-06-09 15:28   ` Ciprian Regus
2026-06-09 15:28 ` [PATCH net-next v4 08/13] net: ethernet: oa_tc6: Use the read_mms/write_mms functions for C45 Ciprian Regus via B4 Relay
2026-06-09 15:28   ` Ciprian Regus
2026-06-10 15:28   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-09 15:28 ` [PATCH net-next v4 09/13] net: ethernet: oa_tc6: Add new register address defines Ciprian Regus via B4 Relay
2026-06-09 15:28   ` Ciprian Regus
2026-06-09 15:28 ` [PATCH net-next v4 10/13] net: phy: add generic helpers for direct C45 MMD access Ciprian Regus via B4 Relay
2026-06-09 15:28   ` Ciprian Regus
2026-06-09 15:28 ` [PATCH net-next v4 11/13] net: phy: microchip-t1s: use generic C45 MMD access helpers Ciprian Regus via B4 Relay
2026-06-09 15:28   ` Ciprian Regus
2026-06-09 15:28 ` [PATCH net-next v4 12/13] net: phy: Add support for the ADIN1140 PHY Ciprian Regus via B4 Relay
2026-06-09 15:28   ` Ciprian Regus
2026-06-09 15:28 ` [PATCH net-next v4 13/13] net: ethernet: adi: Add a driver for the ADIN1140 MACPHY Ciprian Regus via B4 Relay
2026-06-09 15:28   ` Ciprian Regus
2026-06-10 15:28   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260610152822.27D341F00893@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=devnull+ciprian.regus.analog.com@kernel.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.