From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Sanjay Chitroda" <sanjayembeddedse@gmail.com>
Cc: dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com, linux-input@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/7] iio: light: hid-sensor-als: use u32 instead of unsigned
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2026 15:47:10 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260610154711.064001F00893@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260610-6-june-hid-iio-correct-usage-id-v2-3-c3c5f0720493@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Directly casting the `raw_data` byte array to `u32*` and `s64*` in capture callbacks causes unaligned memory accesses, incorrect endianness handling, and potential out-of-bounds reads.
--
commit 8c6bb48eb0d753aea033d76922dc45a105550e60
Author: Sanjay Chitroda <sanjayembeddedse@gmail.com>
iio: light: hid-sensor-als: use u32 instead of unsigned
Prefer 'u32' instead of bare 'unsigned' for usage_id variable.
This matches expected callback API type and improves code clarity.
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/light/hid-sensor-als.c b/drivers/iio/light/hid-sensor-als.c
> index d72e260b82668..ae2fda8dc500a 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/light/hid-sensor-als.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/light/hid-sensor-als.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -263,7 +263,7 @@ static int als_proc_event(struct hid_sensor_hub_device *hsdev,
>
> /* Capture samples in local storage */
> static int als_capture_sample(struct hid_sensor_hub_device *hsdev,
> - unsigned usage_id,
> + u32 usage_id,
> size_t raw_len, char *raw_data,
> void *priv)
> {
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does the direct cast in this function cause
unaligned memory accesses or endianness issues?
Just a few lines down in als_capture_sample(), raw_data is cast directly:
int ret = -EINVAL;
u32 sample_data = *(u32 *)raw_data;
The HID sensor hub core passes a byte pointer raw_data which points directly
into the raw HID report. In sensor_hub_report(), the pointer is incremented
by 1 to skip the report ID, making it immediately unaligned.
Dereferencing this unaligned pointer directly via *(u32 *) or *(s64 *) can
cause unaligned memory access faults on architectures that do not support
them.
Additionally, since HID reports are strictly little-endian, a direct
cast on a big-endian host might result in corrupted sensor data.
Should this code use get_unaligned_le32() and get_unaligned_le64() instead,
and also validate that raw_len is sufficient to prevent out-of-bounds reads?
The same direct cast pattern appears to be present in other HID sensors,
such as accel_3d_capture_sample() and gyro_3d_capture_sample().
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260610-6-june-hid-iio-correct-usage-id-v2-0-c3c5f0720493@gmail.com?part=3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-10 15:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-10 15:37 [PATCH v2 0/7] HID: iio: basic clean up for usage_id Sanjay Chitroda
2026-06-10 15:37 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] iio: gyro: hid-sensor-gyro-3d: use u32 instead of unsigned Sanjay Chitroda
2026-06-10 15:37 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] iio: accel: hid-sensor-accel-3d: " Sanjay Chitroda
2026-06-10 15:46 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-10 15:37 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] iio: light: hid-sensor-als: " Sanjay Chitroda
2026-06-10 15:47 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-10 15:37 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] iio: light: hid-sensor-prox: " Sanjay Chitroda
2026-06-10 15:47 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-10 15:37 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] iio: orientation: hid-sensor-incl-3d: " Sanjay Chitroda
2026-06-10 15:51 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-10 15:37 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] iio: orientation: hid-sensor-rotation: " Sanjay Chitroda
2026-06-10 15:47 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-10 15:37 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] iio: pressure: hid-sensor-press: " Sanjay Chitroda
2026-06-10 15:55 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260610154711.064001F00893@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sanjayembeddedse@gmail.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.