From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Ratheesh Kannoth <rkannoth@marvell.com>
Cc: Yuho Choi <dbgh9129@gmail.com>,
Sunil Goutham <sgoutham@marvell.com>,
"Linu Cherian" <lcherian@marvell.com>,
Geetha sowjanya <gakula@marvell.com>,
hariprasad <hkelam@marvell.com>,
Subbaraya Sundeep <sbhatta@marvell.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <nshettyj@marvell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] octeontx2-af: Fix PCI device reference leaks in debugfs
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2026 10:45:47 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260611104547.22cedb69@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aioblJqQctA_9U8y@rkannoth-OptiPlex-7090>
On Thu, 11 Jun 2026 07:51:08 +0530 Ratheesh Kannoth wrote:
> > Review question sort of based on a Sashiko comment - this is part of
> > the rvu device driver, AFAIU, does anything prevent the AF from getting
> > removed (via sysfs for instance) while this code is using its priv?
>
> RVU AF driver's teardown sequence prevents the race here. In
> rvu_remove(), the very first call is rvu_dbg_exit(rvu),
> which calls debugfs_remove_recursive() on the debugfs root.
> ASFAIK, debugfs_remove_recursive() will block until all active
> readers (i.e., any in-progress seq_file read callbacks like
> cgx_print_stats(), cgx_print_dmac_flt(), and
> cgx_print_fwdata()) have completed before the removal
> proceeds. Only after rvu_dbg_exit() returns does
> rvu_remove() proceed to free the rvu structure.
>
> A better approach would be to pass the rvu object(rvu structure has pdev field) while
> creating the debugfs file itself, e.g.:
>
> RVU_DEBUG_SEQ_FOPS(cgx_dmac_flt, cgx_dmac_flt_display, s/NULL/rvu);
>
> This would eliminate the pci_get_device() lookup entirely. We
> will post this as a code clean-up patch to net-next.
Oh, that's much better, somehow I assumed that this dance is necessary
because we are accessing a different PCI device.
Also, since you're actively working upstream and nobody else on the CC
list responded - should you perhaps be added to maintainers for this
driver so that you're CCed on patches? (instead of one of the useless
ones)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-11 17:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-08 16:55 [PATCH net-next v2] octeontx2-af: Fix PCI device reference leaks in debugfs Yuho Choi
2026-06-10 15:35 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-06-11 2:21 ` Ratheesh Kannoth
2026-06-11 17:45 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2026-06-11 19:03 ` 최유호
2026-06-12 1:58 ` Ratheesh Kannoth
2026-06-12 1:49 ` Ratheesh Kannoth
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260611104547.22cedb69@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dbgh9129@gmail.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=gakula@marvell.com \
--cc=hkelam@marvell.com \
--cc=lcherian@marvell.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nshettyj@marvell.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=rkannoth@marvell.com \
--cc=sbhatta@marvell.com \
--cc=sgoutham@marvell.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.