From: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
To: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Cc: <oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev>, <lkp@intel.com>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <x86@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>, <aubrey.li@linux.intel.com>,
<yu.c.chen@intel.com>, <oliver.sang@intel.com>
Subject: [tip:sched/core] [sched/topology] 9e005ed211: stress-ng.kill.ops_per_sec 4.6% regression
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2026 10:19:20 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202606111053.c484a580-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
Hello,
kernel test robot noticed a 4.6% regression of stress-ng.kill.ops_per_sec on:
commit: 9e005ed21152d4a4bb0ceea71045ff8a642a6feb ("sched/topology: Allow multiple domains to claim sched_domain_shared")
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git sched/core
testcase: stress-ng
config: x86_64-rhel-9.4
compiler: gcc-14
test machine: 256 threads 4 sockets INTEL(R) XEON(R) PLATINUM 8592+ (Emerald Rapids) with 256G memory
parameters:
nr_threads: 100%
testtime: 60s
test: kill
cpufreq_governor: performance
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202606111053.c484a580-lkp@intel.com
Details are as below:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->
The kernel config and materials to reproduce are available at:
https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260611/202606111053.c484a580-lkp@intel.com
=========================================================================================
compiler/cpufreq_governor/kconfig/nr_threads/rootfs/tbox_group/test/testcase/testtime:
gcc-14/performance/x86_64-rhel-9.4/100%/debian-13-x86_64-20250902.cgz/lkp-emr-2sp1/kill/stress-ng/60s
commit:
a26d9208c1 ("Merge branch 'sched/cache'")
9e005ed211 ("sched/topology: Allow multiple domains to claim sched_domain_shared")
a26d9208c1376ac3 9e005ed21152d4a4bb0ceea7104
---------------- ---------------------------
%stddev %change %stddev
\ | \
16542 -5.6% 15623 stress-ng.kill.kill_calls_per_sec
66940342 -4.6% 63830711 stress-ng.kill.ops
1116630 -4.6% 1064849 stress-ng.kill.ops_per_sec
50279 +5.7% 53164 meminfo.KernelStack
14019 ± 46% -48.8% 7174 ± 70% numa-vmstat.node2.nr_slab_reclaimable
10643 ± 21% +49.0% 15853 ± 19% numa-vmstat.node3.nr_slab_reclaimable
50278 +5.7% 53144 proc-vmstat.nr_kernel_stack
74611 +1.0% 75344 proc-vmstat.nr_vmalloc
613641 +5.5% 647439 ± 3% proc-vmstat.pgfree
56078 ± 46% -48.8% 28697 ± 70% numa-meminfo.node2.KReclaimable
56078 ± 46% -48.8% 28697 ± 70% numa-meminfo.node2.SReclaimable
42574 ± 21% +49.1% 63467 ± 19% numa-meminfo.node3.KReclaimable
42574 ± 21% +49.1% 63467 ± 19% numa-meminfo.node3.SReclaimable
0.03 ± 55% -64.7% 0.01 ± 99% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.spread.avg
0.26 ± 27% -55.0% 0.12 ± 84% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.spread.stddev
4715 ± 14% -28.3% 3380 ± 44% sched_debug.cpu.curr->pid.min
0.32 ± 3% -8.3% 0.30 ± 3% sched_debug.cpu.nr_running.stddev
22.17 ± 31% +128.9% 50.75 ± 12% sched_debug.cpu.nr_uninterruptible.max
3.99 ± 14% +55.6% 6.20 ± 4% sched_debug.cpu.nr_uninterruptible.stddev
Disclaimer:
Results have been estimated based on internal Intel analysis and are provided
for informational purposes only. Any difference in system hardware or software
design or configuration may affect actual performance.
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
next reply other threads:[~2026-06-11 2:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-11 2:19 kernel test robot [this message]
2026-06-11 5:01 ` [tip:sched/core] [sched/topology] 9e005ed211: stress-ng.kill.ops_per_sec 4.6% regression Chen, Yu C
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202606111053.c484a580-lkp@intel.com \
--to=oliver.sang@intel.com \
--cc=arighi@nvidia.com \
--cc=aubrey.li@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.