All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: phucduc.bui@gmail.com
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	Liam Girdwood <liam.r.girdwood@linux.intel.com>,
	Cezary Rojewski <cezary.rojewski@intel.com>
Cc: Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com>,
	Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com>,
	Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com>,
	Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com>,
	Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.dev>,
	linux-sound@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	bui duc phuc <phucduc.bui@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 02/20] ASoC: Intel: catpt: dsp: Use guard() for mutex locks
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2026 18:58:43 +0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260611115901.80438-3-phucduc.bui@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260611115901.80438-1-phucduc.bui@gmail.com>

From: bui duc phuc <phucduc.bui@gmail.com>

Clean up the code using guard() for mutex locks.
Merely code refactoring, and no behavior change.

Signed-off-by: bui duc phuc <phucduc.bui@gmail.com>
---
 sound/soc/intel/catpt/dsp.c | 11 +++--------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sound/soc/intel/catpt/dsp.c b/sound/soc/intel/catpt/dsp.c
index 677f348909c8..1eb1591213c4 100644
--- a/sound/soc/intel/catpt/dsp.c
+++ b/sound/soc/intel/catpt/dsp.c
@@ -256,17 +256,15 @@ static int catpt_dsp_select_lpclock(struct catpt_dev *cdev, bool lp, bool waiti)
 	u32 mask, reg, val;
 	int ret;
 
-	mutex_lock(&cdev->clk_mutex);
+	guard(mutex)(&cdev->clk_mutex);
 
 	val = lp ? CATPT_CS_LPCS : 0;
 	reg = catpt_readl_shim(cdev, CS1) & CATPT_CS_LPCS;
 	dev_dbg(cdev->dev, "LPCS [0x%08lx] 0x%08x -> 0x%08x",
 		CATPT_CS_LPCS, reg, val);
 
-	if (reg == val) {
-		mutex_unlock(&cdev->clk_mutex);
+	if (reg == val)
 		return 0;
-	}
 
 	if (waiti) {
 		/* wait for DSP to signal WAIT state */
@@ -276,10 +274,8 @@ static int catpt_dsp_select_lpclock(struct catpt_dev *cdev, bool lp, bool waiti)
 		if (ret) {
 			dev_warn(cdev->dev, "await WAITI timeout\n");
 			/* no signal - only high clock selection allowed */
-			if (lp) {
-				mutex_unlock(&cdev->clk_mutex);
+			if (lp)
 				return 0;
-			}
 		}
 	}
 
@@ -303,7 +299,6 @@ static int catpt_dsp_select_lpclock(struct catpt_dev *cdev, bool lp, bool waiti)
 	/* update PLL accordingly */
 	cdev->spec->pll_shutdown(cdev, lp);
 
-	mutex_unlock(&cdev->clk_mutex);
 	return 0;
 }
 
-- 
2.43.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-06-11 11:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-11 11:58 [PATCH 00/20] ASoC: Intel: Use guard() for mutex & spin locks phucduc.bui
2026-06-11 11:58 ` [PATCH 01/20] ASoC: Intel: catpt: ipc: " phucduc.bui
2026-06-11 18:44   ` Cezary Rojewski
2026-06-12  4:05     ` Bui Duc Phuc
2026-06-11 11:58 ` phucduc.bui [this message]
2026-06-11 18:39   ` [PATCH 02/20] ASoC: Intel: catpt: dsp: Use guard() for mutex locks Cezary Rojewski
2026-06-11 11:58 ` [PATCH 03/20] ASoC: Intel: avs: utils: " phucduc.bui
2026-06-11 11:58 ` [PATCH 04/20] ASoC: Intel: avs: probes: Use guard() for spin locks phucduc.bui
2026-06-11 19:34   ` Cezary Rojewski
2026-06-12  4:48     ` Bui Duc Phuc
2026-06-11 11:58 ` [PATCH 05/20] ASoC: Intel: avs: pcm: Use guard() for mutex & " phucduc.bui
2026-06-11 11:58 ` [PATCH 06/20] ASoC: Intel: avs: path: " phucduc.bui
2026-06-11 11:58 ` [PATCH 07/20] ASoC: Intel: avs: loader: Use guard() for mutex locks phucduc.bui
2026-06-11 11:58 ` [PATCH 08/20] ASoC: Intel: avs: ipc: Use guard() for mutex & spin locks phucduc.bui
2026-06-11 11:58 ` [PATCH 09/20] ASoC: Intel: avs: icl: Use guard() for " phucduc.bui
2026-06-11 11:58 ` [PATCH 10/20] ASoC: Intel: avs: debugfs: " phucduc.bui
2026-06-11 11:58 ` [PATCH 11/20] ASoC: Intel: avs: debug: " phucduc.bui
2026-06-11 11:58 ` [PATCH 12/20] ASoC: Intel: avs: core: Use guard() for mutex & " phucduc.bui
2026-06-11 11:58 ` [PATCH 13/20] ASoC: Intel: avs: control: Use guard() for " phucduc.bui
2026-06-11 11:58 ` [PATCH 14/20] ASoC: Intel: avs: apl: " phucduc.bui
2026-06-11 11:58 ` [PATCH 15/20] ASoC: Intel: atom: sst_stream: Use guard() for mutex locks phucduc.bui
2026-06-11 11:58 ` [PATCH 16/20] ASoC: Intel: atom: sst_pvt: Use guard() for mutex & spin locks phucduc.bui
2026-06-11 11:58 ` [PATCH 17/20] ASoC: Intel: atom: sst: Use guard() for " phucduc.bui
2026-06-11 11:58 ` [PATCH 18/20] ASoC: Intel: atom: sst-atom-controls: Use guard() for mutex locks phucduc.bui
2026-06-11 11:59 ` [PATCH 19/20] ASoC: Intel: atom: sst-mfld-platform-pcm: Use guard() for mutex & spin locks phucduc.bui
2026-06-11 11:59 ` [PATCH 20/20] ASoC: Intel: atom: sst_ipc: Use guard() for " phucduc.bui
2026-06-11 19:04 ` [PATCH 00/20] ASoC: Intel: Use guard() for mutex & " Cezary Rojewski
2026-06-12  3:45   ` Bui Duc Phuc

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260611115901.80438-3-phucduc.bui@gmail.com \
    --to=phucduc.bui@gmail.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=cezary.rojewski@intel.com \
    --cc=kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=liam.r.girdwood@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sound@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=perex@perex.cz \
    --cc=peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=pierre-louis.bossart@linux.dev \
    --cc=tiwai@suse.com \
    --cc=yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.