From: Petr Tesarik <ptesarik@suse.com>
To: "Brendan Jackman" <brendan.jackman@linux.dev>
Cc: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"David Hildenbrand" <david@kernel.org>,
"Lorenzo Stoakes" <ljs@kernel.org>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <liam@infradead.org>,
"Vlastimil Babka" <vbabka@kernel.org>,
"Mike Rapoport" <rppt@kernel.org>,
"Suren Baghdasaryan" <surenb@google.com>,
"Michal Hocko" <mhocko@suse.com>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"Brendan Jackman" <jackmanb@google.com>,
"Johannes Weiner" <hannes@cmpxchg.org>, "Zi Yan" <ziy@nvidia.com>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] mm: reduce NODE_RECLAIM_xxx and change to enum
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2026 13:31:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260612133155.71958e80@mordecai> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DJ6ZMH9VU0BE.6Q8EHJIL65DW@linux.dev>
On Fri, 12 Jun 2026 10:10:20 +0000
"Brendan Jackman" <brendan.jackman@linux.dev> wrote:
> On Fri Jun 12, 2026 at 8:50 AM UTC, Petr Tesarik wrote:
> > Change node_reclaim() to return an enum indicating whether any
> > pages have been reclaimed, because that's all the information
> > needed by the only caller, get_page_from_freelist().
> >
> > This leads to the following translation of the old macro
> > identifiers to the new enum values:
> >
> > - NODE_RECLAIM_NOSCAN -> NODE_RECLAIM_NONE
> > - NODE_RECLAIM_FULL -> NODE_RECLAIM_NONE
> > - NODE_RECLAIM_SOME -> NODE_RECLAIM_SUCCESS
> > - NODE_RECLAIM_SUCCESS -> NODE_RECLAIM_SUCCESS
> >
> > Originally, I was looking for occurences of NODE_RECLAIM_SOME
> > and NODE_RECLAIM_SUCCESS, but I couldn't find any. That's because
> > they are typecast from the result of a relational operator. This
> > seemed a bit fragile, so I dug a bit deeper and came up with this
> > proposed cleanup.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Petr Tesarik <ptesarik@suse.com>
> >
> > --
> >
> > Changes from v1:
> > - use an enum instead of a bool
> > ---
> > mm/internal.h | 17 +++++++++--------
> > mm/page_alloc.c | 19 ++++---------------
> > mm/vmscan.c | 18 +++++++++---------
> > 3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/internal.h b/mm/internal.h
> > index 181e79f1d6a20..89b0ea28051c1 100644
> > --- a/mm/internal.h
> > +++ b/mm/internal.h
> > @@ -1373,23 +1373,24 @@ static inline void mminit_verify_zonelist(void)
> > }
> > #endif /* CONFIG_DEBUG_MEMORY_INIT */
> >
> > -#define NODE_RECLAIM_NOSCAN -2
> > -#define NODE_RECLAIM_FULL -1
> > -#define NODE_RECLAIM_SOME 0
> > -#define NODE_RECLAIM_SUCCESS 1
> > +enum node_reclaim {
> > + NODE_RECLAIM_NONE,
> > + NODE_RECLAIM_SUCCESS,
> > +};
> >
> > #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
> > extern int node_reclaim_mode;
> >
> > -extern int node_reclaim(struct pglist_data *, gfp_t, unsigned int);
> > +extern enum node_reclaim node_reclaim(struct pglist_data *pgdat,
> > + gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order);
> > extern int find_next_best_node(int node, nodemask_t *used_node_mask);
> > #else
> > #define node_reclaim_mode 0
> >
> > -static inline int node_reclaim(struct pglist_data *pgdat, gfp_t mask,
> > - unsigned int order)
> > +static inline enum node_reclaim node_reclaim(struct pglist_data *pgdat,
> > + gfp_t mask, unsigned int order)
> > {
> > - return NODE_RECLAIM_NOSCAN;
> > + return NODE_RECLAIM_NONE;
> > }
> > static inline int find_next_best_node(int node, nodemask_t *used_node_mask)
> > {
> > diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> > index f7db8f049bd23..83a1caac5ac9c 100644
> > --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> > +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> > @@ -3899,8 +3899,6 @@ get_page_from_freelist(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order, int alloc_flags,
> > if (!zone_watermark_fast(zone, order, mark,
> > ac->highest_zoneidx, alloc_flags,
> > gfp_mask)) {
> > - int ret;
> > -
> > if (cond_accept_memory(zone, order, alloc_flags))
> > goto try_this_zone;
> >
> > @@ -3921,22 +3919,13 @@ get_page_from_freelist(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order, int alloc_flags,
> > !zone_allows_reclaim(zonelist_zone(ac->preferred_zoneref), zone))
> > continue;
> >
> > - ret = node_reclaim(zone->zone_pgdat, gfp_mask, order);
> > - switch (ret) {
> > - case NODE_RECLAIM_NOSCAN:
> > - /* did not scan */
> > - continue;
> > - case NODE_RECLAIM_FULL:
> > - /* scanned but unreclaimable */
> > + if (node_reclaim(zone->zone_pgdat, gfp_mask, order) == NODE_RECLAIM_NONE)
> > continue;
> > - default:
> > - /* did we reclaim enough */
> > - if (zone_watermark_ok(zone, order, mark,
> > - ac->highest_zoneidx, alloc_flags))
> > - goto try_this_zone;
> >
> > + /* did we reclaim enough */
> > + if (!zone_watermark_ok(zone, order, mark,
> > + ac->highest_zoneidx, alloc_flags))
> > continue;
> > - }
> > }
> >
> > try_this_zone:
> > diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> > index 3f3ff25e561ac..d5bd55620ee9a 100644
> > --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> > +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> > @@ -7786,9 +7786,9 @@ static unsigned long __node_reclaim(struct pglist_data *pgdat, gfp_t gfp_mask,
> > return sc->nr_reclaimed;
> > }
> >
> > -int node_reclaim(struct pglist_data *pgdat, gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order)
> > +enum node_reclaim node_reclaim(struct pglist_data *pgdat, gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order)
> > {
> > - int ret;
> > + unsigned long nr_reclaimed;
> > /* Minimum pages needed in order to stay on node */
> > const unsigned long nr_pages = 1 << order;
> > struct scan_control sc = {
> > @@ -7815,13 +7815,13 @@ int node_reclaim(struct pglist_data *pgdat, gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order)
> > if (node_pagecache_reclaimable(pgdat) <= pgdat->min_unmapped_pages &&
> > node_page_state_pages(pgdat, NR_SLAB_RECLAIMABLE_B) <=
> > pgdat->min_slab_pages)
> > - return NODE_RECLAIM_FULL;
> > + return NODE_RECLAIM_NONE;
> >
> > /*
> > * Do not scan if the allocation should not be delayed.
> > */
> > if (!gfpflags_allow_blocking(gfp_mask) || (current->flags & PF_MEMALLOC))
> > - return NODE_RECLAIM_NOSCAN;
> > + return NODE_RECLAIM_NONE;
> >
> > /*
> > * Only run node reclaim on the local node or on nodes that do not
> > @@ -7830,20 +7830,20 @@ int node_reclaim(struct pglist_data *pgdat, gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order)
> > * as wide as possible.
> > */
> > if (node_state(pgdat->node_id, N_CPU) && pgdat->node_id != numa_node_id())
> > - return NODE_RECLAIM_NOSCAN;
> > + return NODE_RECLAIM_NONE;
> >
> > if (test_and_set_bit_lock(PGDAT_RECLAIM_LOCKED, &pgdat->flags))
> > - return NODE_RECLAIM_NOSCAN;
> > + return NODE_RECLAIM_NONE;
> >
> > - ret = __node_reclaim(pgdat, gfp_mask, nr_pages, &sc) >= nr_pages;
> > + nr_reclaimed = __node_reclaim(pgdat, gfp_mask, nr_pages, &sc);
> > clear_bit_unlock(PGDAT_RECLAIM_LOCKED, &pgdat->flags);
> >
> > - if (ret)
> > + if (nr_reclaimed >= nr_pages)
> > count_vm_event(PGSCAN_ZONE_RECLAIM_SUCCESS);
> > else
> > count_vm_event(PGSCAN_ZONE_RECLAIM_FAILED);
> >
> > - return ret;
> > + return NODE_RECLAIM_SUCCESS;
>
> Should that be returning NODE_RECLAIM_NONE when !ret?
No. That's the thing. Before my patch, the return value here was either
NODE_RECLAIM_SUCCESS (when at least nr_pages were reclaimed), or
NODE_RECLAIM_SOME (if less than nr_pages were reclaimed), but the caller
makes no distinction, handling both cases in the default label of a
switch statement.
Petr T
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-12 11:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-12 8:50 [PATCH v2 1/1] mm: reduce NODE_RECLAIM_xxx and change to enum Petr Tesarik
2026-06-12 10:10 ` Brendan Jackman
2026-06-12 11:31 ` Petr Tesarik [this message]
2026-06-12 14:28 ` Brendan Jackman
2026-06-12 15:01 ` Zi Yan
2026-06-12 15:10 ` Brendan Jackman
2026-06-12 15:17 ` Zi Yan
2026-06-12 14:57 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-06-12 15:10 ` Petr Tesarik
2026-06-12 14:57 ` Zi Yan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260612133155.71958e80@mordecai \
--to=ptesarik@suse.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=brendan.jackman@linux.dev \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=jackmanb@google.com \
--cc=liam@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.