From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-next v3 4/9] mm/slab: use call_rcu() in unknown context if irqs are enabled
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2026 11:25:05 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260615112506.131D51F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260615-kfree_rcu_nolock-v3-4-70a54f3775bb@kernel.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Acquiring a local_trylock inside a raw_spinlock_t wait context triggers a lockdep Invalid wait context warning.
--
commit 05f00697f28bd84542538d9e89bbc00e3f7a427a
Author: Harry Yoo (Oracle) <harry@kernel.org>
mm/slab: use call_rcu() in unknown context if irqs are enabled
This commit modifies the fallback logic for deferred RCU freeing in the
slab allocator. It now uses call_rcu() even in an unknown context as long
as interrupts are enabled.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/CAADnVQKRVD5ZSnEKbZZU7w86gHbGHUug2pvzpgZTngNS+fg4rw@mail.gmail.com
> diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
> index b0d38d5153865..6a3552b70683d 100644
> --- a/mm/slub.c
> +++ b/mm/slub.c
> @@ -6158,8 +6158,8 @@ bool __kfree_rcu_sheaf(struct kmem_cache *s, void *obj, bool allow_spin)
> if (likely(rcu_sheaf->size < s->sheaf_capacity)) {
> rcu_sheaf = NULL;
> } else {
> - if (unlikely(!allow_spin)) {
> - /* call_rcu() cannot be called in an unknown context */
> + /* call_rcu() disables IRQs to protect percpu data structures */
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but since you are modifying
__kfree_rcu_sheaf() here, can this function trigger an invalid wait context
warning in lockdep?
According to the RCU guidelines, kvfree_call_rcu() is frequently called
while holding a raw_spinlock_t (such as pi_lock in kernel/sched/core.c)
and from hardirq context:
mm/slab_common.c:kvfree_call_rcu() {
...
if (kfree_rcu_sheaf(ptr))
return;
...
}
This calls into __kfree_rcu_sheaf(), which unconditionally attempts to
acquire a local_lock earlier in the function:
mm/slub.c:__kfree_rcu_sheaf() {
...
if (!local_trylock(&s->cpu_sheaves->lock))
goto fail;
...
}
Because local_lock has a lower lockdep wait type than raw_spinlock_t,
does this wait context inversion violate nesting rules and trigger
warnings?
Guarding lock_map_acquire_try with !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT) does not
prevent this because local_trylock internally checks wait contexts
regardless. Could this lead to panics on systems with panic_on_warn enabled?
> + if (unlikely(!allow_spin && irqs_disabled())) {
> rcu_sheaf->size--;
> local_unlock(&s->cpu_sheaves->lock);
> goto fail;
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260615-kfree_rcu_nolock-v3-0-70a54f3775bb@kernel.org?part=4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-15 11:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-15 11:05 [PATCH for-next v3 0/9] mm/slab: introduce kfree_rcu_nolock() and improve slub_kunit coverage Harry Yoo (Oracle)
2026-06-15 11:05 ` [PATCH for-next v3 1/9] slub_kunit: fall back to SW perf events when HW PMU is not available Harry Yoo (Oracle)
2026-06-15 11:14 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-15 12:58 ` Harry Yoo
2026-06-15 20:01 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-06-15 11:05 ` [PATCH for-next v3 2/9] mm/slab, slub_kunit: register kprobe to trigger _nolock APIs Harry Yoo (Oracle)
2026-06-15 11:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-15 20:04 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-06-15 11:05 ` [PATCH for-next v3 3/9] mm/slab: handle the !allow_spin case in kfree_rcu_sheaf() Harry Yoo (Oracle)
2026-06-15 11:24 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-15 11:05 ` [PATCH for-next v3 4/9] mm/slab: use call_rcu() in unknown context if irqs are enabled Harry Yoo (Oracle)
2026-06-15 11:25 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-15 11:05 ` [PATCH for-next v3 5/9] mm/slab: extend deferred free mechanism to handle rcu sheaves Harry Yoo (Oracle)
2026-06-15 11:24 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-15 11:06 ` [PATCH for-next v3 6/9] mm/slab: allow kfree_rcu_sheaf() on PREEMPT_RT Harry Yoo (Oracle)
2026-06-15 11:19 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-15 11:06 ` [PATCH for-next v3 7/9] mm/slab: introduce kfree_rcu_nolock() Harry Yoo (Oracle)
2026-06-15 11:22 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-15 11:06 ` [PATCH for-next v3 8/9] mm/slab: introduce struct kfree_rcu_head and use in kfree_rcu_nolock() Harry Yoo (Oracle)
2026-06-15 11:22 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-15 11:06 ` [PATCH for-next v3 9/9] slub_kunit: extend the test for kfree_rcu_nolock() Harry Yoo (Oracle)
2026-06-15 11:43 ` [PATCH for-next v3 0/9] mm/slab: introduce kfree_rcu_nolock() and improve slub_kunit coverage Harry Yoo
2026-06-15 20:28 ` Alexei Starovoitov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260615112506.131D51F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.