All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Ren Wei <n05ec@lzu.edu.cn>
Cc: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, alibuda@linux.alibaba.com,
	dust.li@linux.alibaba.com, sidraya@linux.ibm.com,
	wenjia@linux.ibm.com, mjambigi@linux.ibm.com,
	tonylu@linux.alibaba.com, guwen@linux.alibaba.com,
	ubraun@linux.ibm.com, stefan.raspl@linux.ibm.com,
	davem@davemloft.net, yuantan098@gmail.com, zcliangcn@gmail.com,
	bird@lzu.edu.cn, lx24@stu.ynu.edu.cn, d4n.for.sec@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/1] net: smc: fix splice entry lifetime imbalance in smc_rx_splice
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2026 12:49:29 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260615124929.6f98051f@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <192d1b44ed358ca143f44ef167d14153bccc51e9.1781097957.git.d4n.for.sec@gmail.com>

On Thu, 11 Jun 2026 01:54:11 +0800 Ren Wei wrote:
> smc_rx_splice() hands candidate pages to splice_to_pipe() without taking
> references for the lifetime of each splice entry first. That breaks the
> splice ownership contract in the VM-backed RMB path.
> 
> splice_to_pipe() drops unqueued entries through spd_release(), while
> queued entries are later dropped through the pipe buffer release
> callback. The current code only tries to take page references after the
> splice succeeds, and it derives the number of queued VM pages from a
> mutated offset value. This can underflow page refcounts and trigger a
> use-after-free. It also leaves the socket lifetime imbalanced in the
> multi-page VM case, where one sock_hold() can be followed by multiple
> sock_put() calls.
> 
> Fix this by taking the page and socket references for every candidate
> splice entry before calling splice_to_pipe(), and by releasing the
> matching private state, page reference, and socket reference from
> smc_rx_spd_release() for entries that never get queued. This makes the
> SMC splice path follow the normal splice lifetime rules and removes the
> broken post-splice VM page counting entirely.

SMC maintainers please review.

      parent reply	other threads:[~2026-06-15 19:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <cover.1781097957.git.d4n.for.sec@gmail.com>
2026-06-10 17:54 ` [PATCH net 1/1] net: smc: fix splice entry lifetime imbalance in smc_rx_splice Ren Wei
2026-06-11 17:54   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-15 19:49   ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260615124929.6f98051f@kernel.org \
    --to=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=alibuda@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=bird@lzu.edu.cn \
    --cc=d4n.for.sec@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dust.li@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=guwen@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lx24@stu.ynu.edu.cn \
    --cc=mjambigi@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=n05ec@lzu.edu.cn \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sidraya@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=stefan.raspl@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=tonylu@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=ubraun@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=wenjia@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=yuantan098@gmail.com \
    --cc=zcliangcn@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.