From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo" <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/9] perf cs-etm: Bounds-check CPU in cs_etm__get_queue()
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2026 22:54:39 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260615225439.EF5CE1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260615223249.36598-6-acme@kernel.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Missing NULL checks on `etmq` and `etmq->decoder` lead to segmentation faults on malformed or out-of-bounds auxtrace queues.
--
commit 97b84b25fe94e957ad4cb91dac4d3e8d49fe5b1d
Author: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
perf cs-etm: Bounds-check CPU in cs_etm__get_queue()
cs_etm__get_queue() indexes etm->queues.queue_array[cpu] without
validating that cpu is within nr_queues. When processing
AUX_OUTPUT_HW_ID events, the cpu value comes from untrusted perf.data
trace payload and flows through cs_etm__process_trace_id_v0_1() and
cs_etm__queue_aux_fragment() without bounds checking, allowing an
out-of-bounds read with a crafted file. Add a bounds check in
cs_etm__get_queue() and NULL checks in all callers.
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/cs-etm.c b/tools/perf/util/cs-etm.c
> index d121c8f22028d..5d0664ff73b79 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/cs-etm.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/cs-etm.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -318,6 +324,9 @@ static int cs_etm__map_trace_id_v0(struct cs_etm_auxtrace *etm, u8 trace_chan_id
> int ret;
>
> etmq = etm->queues.queue_array[i].priv;
> + if (!etmq)
> + continue;
> +
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but since we are adding NULL checks for the priv
field here because auxtrace_queues__grow() zero-initializes new entries, are
there other places that might still be vulnerable to this?
For example, in cs_etm__process_auxtrace_event(), we index into the queue array
and pass the priv field directly to cs_etm__dump_event():
err = auxtrace_queues__add_event(&etm->queues, session,
event, data_offset, &buffer);
if (err)
return err;
if (dump_trace)
if (auxtrace_buffer__get_data(buffer, fd)) {
cs_etm__dump_event(etm->queues.queue_array[idx].priv, buffer);
auxtrace_buffer__put_data(buffer);
}
Then cs_etm__dump_event() unconditionally dereferences etmq->decoder, which
causes a segmentation fault if etmq is NULL:
static void cs_etm__dump_event(struct cs_etm_queue *etmq,
struct auxtrace_buffer *buffer)
{
...
color_fprintf(stdout, color,
". ... CoreSight %s Trace data: size %#zx bytes\n",
cs_etm_decoder__get_name(etmq->decoder), buffer->size);
Additionally, if the queue is empty during decoder creation, etmq->decoder can
be NULL. Later in cs_etm__decode_data_block(), etmq->decoder is passed without
a NULL check:
ret = cs_etm_decoder__process_data_block(etmq->decoder,
etmq->offset,
Could this be triggered by a malformed or out-of-bounds auxtrace index,
resulting in a crash?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260615223249.36598-1-acme@kernel.org?part=5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-15 22:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-15 22:32 [PATCHES v2 0/9] perf tools: Fix pre-existing bugs in machine, cs-etm, c2c, bpf, and dso Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-06-15 22:32 ` [PATCH 1/9] perf machine: Propagate machine__init() error to callers Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-06-15 22:52 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-15 22:32 ` [PATCH 2/9] perf machine: Use snprintf() for guestmount path construction Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-06-15 22:32 ` [PATCH 3/9] perf cs-etm: Validate num_cpu before metadata allocation Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-06-15 22:48 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-15 22:32 ` [PATCH 4/9] perf cs-etm: Require full global header in auxtrace_info size check Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-06-15 22:46 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-15 22:32 ` [PATCH 5/9] perf cs-etm: Bounds-check CPU in cs_etm__get_queue() Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-06-15 22:54 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-15 22:32 ` [PATCH 6/9] perf c2c: Free format list entries when c2c_hists__init() fails Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-06-15 22:32 ` [PATCH 7/9] perf c2c: Fix hist entry and format list leaks in c2c_he_free() Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-06-15 23:04 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-15 22:32 ` [PATCH 8/9] perf bpf: Validate array presence before casting BPF prog info pointers Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-06-15 23:01 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-15 22:32 ` [PATCH 9/9] perf dso: Set standard errno on decompression failure Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-06-16 2:27 [PATCHES v4 0/9] perf tools: Fix pre-existing bugs in machine, cs-etm, c2c, bpf, and dso Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-06-16 2:27 ` [PATCH 5/9] perf cs-etm: Bounds-check CPU in cs_etm__get_queue() Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-06-16 2:48 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-16 1:08 [PATCHES v3 0/9] perf tools: Fix pre-existing bugs in machine, cs-etm, c2c, bpf, and dso Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-06-16 1:08 ` [PATCH 5/9] perf cs-etm: Bounds-check CPU in cs_etm__get_queue() Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-06-16 1:28 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-15 21:36 [PATCHES v1 0/9] perf tools: Fix pre-existing bugs in machine, cs-etm, c2c, bpf, and dso Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-06-15 21:36 ` [PATCH 5/9] perf cs-etm: Bounds-check CPU in cs_etm__get_queue() Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-06-15 21:54 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260615225439.EF5CE1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.