From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists1p.gnu.org (lists1p.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1238CCD98D2 for ; Tue, 16 Jun 2026 04:50:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists1p.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1wZLkf-0006My-5d; Tue, 16 Jun 2026 00:50:17 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists1p.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1wZLkX-0006Id-G3 for qemu-arm@nongnu.org; Tue, 16 Jun 2026 00:50:13 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1wZLkU-0000sP-IN for qemu-arm@nongnu.org; Tue, 16 Jun 2026 00:50:09 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1781585403; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=t59E2aouq/3QjefgJDM5lIaSX+On9iGlsZVXPZNqm54=; b=UE6DpPWSKcXE0fqiWeivrfBlhMIQa+2UiwWqBhtdVnDn+BB8NI09TqMMHJ5KnzTAa8RQb3 gFTH71xuarjDCTIdUpGUF7TZkiiCvZKLvGkNUsaWH/Rb7u/dhfWYrSx8zcSw0St5Yh5EFh 45jLw5Y0NHhVF5MC+3ox+k0ISNhfhVU= Received: from mail-wr1-f72.google.com (mail-wr1-f72.google.com [209.85.221.72]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-102-FcP5uM1OMz2FbpBT3Jd3vA-1; Tue, 16 Jun 2026 00:50:02 -0400 X-MC-Unique: FcP5uM1OMz2FbpBT3Jd3vA-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: FcP5uM1OMz2FbpBT3Jd3vA_1781585402 Received: by mail-wr1-f72.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-4600c8cb13aso2927159f8f.1 for ; Mon, 15 Jun 2026 21:50:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20251104; t=1781585401; x=1782190201; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=t59E2aouq/3QjefgJDM5lIaSX+On9iGlsZVXPZNqm54=; b=WrvjT2GOxhePIwmjFPHAHDiYASIKro7wF+ucQv/1TaV5HLiQZVDCOjaJ71s8oSdIwh Q56keaPlOCtSETwg5O8lbCvtzlxLnCZ56KZ8Dnr/CyMIZYEB5j4pAfy+4QG4x8hGtuSt 62jx8sa00c9xc8uWBBE/vjNLAAEOAUBDl8IOZacjeEHnDCCH+6BA91yfhJboqBxqfhKB 5tNFIMsfR3yxxfWajpHtp5jR2IBgO7y7lXNliPWoILKxiPjBuQvSeK9c4JFxZr+IjYdW JMbe3I/pfDSKrvgvtRkkUXdpX6rgvY1Ma6p7IbdrXLx2PBZJqkiSsULm2Gr/NfoUBnue qxew== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AFNElJ/Dm6m4yQYes+C0CpsikhzJ2SBL94oLyLDQ9zZWedLm6eKxmRTrQ5r7Ze6LNp32l65bCeYtg//Vrw==@nongnu.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzJsAoJv95cUMxJM70k825/4M0A97L8ERtA+v1CuSY/IPCjnIbJ VwytTix3P793v9fdkU7tsN9nQdTMGQ2P/E1qXcmGcPXq1vidlSv5UiQFOxAGvT0DnUo9NIiQZMB r3tcsCxzrKG6HC1eY9lZmgT0c+qxPa0oJQyJA6vdfF1u2XWHy5YoyDg== X-Gm-Gg: Acq92OEjnKhx7CVdkizKox7VOQ4jimm2m7ksysPyzo27wkZjoNpHk3FNYTNMV/kvFi0 orkjtoeYwlnMYohJ0ytPXMsF/+djeDB+09ttfgkjCuaOctkh6fe5b52SjAF4/wFrIlDNWWnYlGn 2kLJogL/AdyLN5AaHVSbvX3s0MNyLorAKemUpHkP0qHnknEHRO7Q4UNbiOUaqE1GcgWyhStjExg kUapegoZJX9dhvZ9P2D1SRxsQmpTuq4ZNrGrhYfxz5qHlJz1+YKZ3irjcSfx+9Hgxa6CaAUNK77 tlpKVloXfjkLSGjbQwAcCoAz+Pbj2UjgAUq53g6wAhgwwE3dQVT64w7GwnbpU4aDjyIksAIJg2x 0Dx/+UxXJkbDRMgm11NaE7jvM3fDxryxDMJDT8luK0v8= X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:3144:b0:48f:e3e7:3d39 with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-490ec4d523dmr231372415e9.11.1781585401422; Mon, 15 Jun 2026 21:50:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:3144:b0:48f:e3e7:3d39 with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-490ec4d523dmr231372005e9.11.1781585401026; Mon, 15 Jun 2026 21:50:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from redhat.com (IGLD-80-230-85-71.inter.net.il. [80.230.85.71]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ffacd0b85a97d-4606f263923sm41116604f8f.2.2026.06.15.21.49.58 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 15 Jun 2026 21:50:00 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2026 00:49:56 -0400 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" To: Richard Henderson Cc: Gavin Shan , Peter Maydell , qemu-arm@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, peterx@redhat.com, alex@shazbot.org, berrange@redhat.com, philmd@oss.qualcomm.com, philmd@mailo.com, david@kernel.org, clg@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, phrdina@redhat.com, jugraham@redhat.com, liugang24219@sangfor.com.cn, dinghui@sangfor.com.cn, shan.gavin@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] system/memory: Use qemu_ram_{copy, move}() in ram device region accessors Message-ID: <20260616004924-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> References: <20260615100200.266968-1-gshan@redhat.com> <20260615100200.266968-2-gshan@redhat.com> <20260615105556-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <20260615154054-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <22d55870-b521-4002-add7-791bce8ea96a@redhat.com> <20260615224658-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <0038f601-7647-4547-a67a-c6a17fae26ca@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <0038f601-7647-4547-a67a-c6a17fae26ca@linaro.org> X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-MFC-PROC-ID: Pr0YytMIEC0GNVYG7-RzbtxXSHIBC4bgPmIuC5q0JHw_1781585402 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.133.124; envelope-from=mst@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -24 X-Spam_score: -2.5 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.5 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.445, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-arm@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-arm-bounces+qemu-arm=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-arm-bounces+qemu-arm=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org On Mon, Jun 15, 2026 at 09:48:00PM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote: > On 6/15/26 21:23, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > B. Also on x86, I do not see why we should not use memcpy for large > > accesses if we can. Better perf. > > We have an example where memcpy writes to the same location 3 times. > This is not appropriate for any host. > > > r~ as in, same byte? could you share the details pls?