From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: guoqi0226 <guoqi0226@163.com>
Cc: "Marc Kleine-Budde" <mkl@pengutronix.de>,
"Oliver Hartkopp" <socketcan@hartkopp.net>,
"Vincent Mailhol" <mailhol@kernel.org>,
"Oleksij Rempel" <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>,
linux-can@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] spi: Add NULL check for spi_get_device_id() in spi_get_device_match_data()
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2026 10:45:11 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260616104511.DD9CC1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260616103018.105612-3-guoqi0226@163.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 3 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] spi_get_device_id() unconditionally dereferences a potentially NULL id_table pointer
- [High] Direct callers of spi_get_device_id() unconditionally dereference its result
- [High] Callers of the patched spi_get_device_match_data() unconditionally dereference its NULL return value
--
commit 7e155f379f89eda6ab91795ac56410fd02c722be
Author: guoqi0226 <guoqi0226@163.com>
spi: Add NULL check for spi_get_device_id() in spi_get_device_match_data()
Prevent NULL pointer dereference when spi_get_device_id() returns NULL,
which can happen when using driver_override without matching SPI ID entry.
> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi.c b/drivers/spi/spi.c
> index 104279858f567..079ac01a2229d 100644
> --- a/drivers/spi/spi.c
> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi.c
> @@ -355,12 +355,16 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(spi_get_device_id);
> const void *spi_get_device_match_data(const struct spi_device *sdev)
> {
> const void *match;
> + const struct spi_device_id *id;
>
> match = device_get_match_data(&sdev->dev);
> if (match)
> return match;
>
> - return (const void *)spi_get_device_id(sdev)->driver_data;
> + id = spi_get_device_id(sdev);
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but can spi_get_device_id() itself crash
if sdrv->id_table is NULL?
If a spi driver only provides a device tree or acpi match table and lacks
an id_table, sdrv->id_table will evaluate to NULL. When spi_get_device_id()
is called, it passes this NULL pointer to spi_match_id():
drivers/spi/spi.c:spi_get_device_id() {
...
return spi_match_id(sdrv->id_table, sdev->modalias);
}
spi_match_id() then unconditionally evaluates id->name[0] in its while loop:
drivers/spi/spi.c:spi_match_id() {
...
while (id->name[0]) {
...
}
Would this result in a NULL pointer dereference when driver_override is used?
[Severity: High]
This is also a pre-existing issue, but do many direct callers of
spi_get_device_id() unconditionally dereference its result?
For example, in drivers/iio/adc/max1118.c:max1118_probe():
indio_dev->name = spi_get_device_id(spi)->name;
If driver_override is used to force a bind to a device whose modalias
does not match the driver's id_table, spi_get_device_id() can return NULL.
Does this mean individual spi drivers might immediately crash if they
don't check the return value?
> + if (!id)
> + return NULL;
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but will returning NULL here just
shift the crash to callers that don't check the return value?
For example, in drivers/gpu/drm/tiny/sharp-memory.c:sharp_memory_probe():
smd->mode = spi_get_device_match_data(spi);
...
smd->pitch = (SHARP_ADDR_PERIOD + smd->mode->hdisplay + ...) / 8;
If spi_get_device_match_data() returns NULL when driver_override is used,
will callers unconditionally dereference it and still cause a kernel panic?
> + return (const void *)id->driver_data;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(spi_get_device_match_data);
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260616103018.105612-1-guoqi0226@163.com?part=2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-16 10:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20260616031332.0F34C1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org 20260616-teal-wrasse-of-conversion-348af0-mkl@pengutronix.de>
2026-06-16 8:53 ` [PATCH v2 0/1] can: mcp251x: Add ACPI device ID table for MCP2515 guoqi0226
2026-06-16 8:53 ` [PATCH v2] can: mcp251xfd: Add ACPI device ID table for MCP251XFD guoqi0226
2026-06-16 9:07 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-16 9:16 ` [PATCH v3 0/1] " guoqi0226
2026-06-16 9:16 ` [PATCH v3 1/1] " guoqi0226
2026-06-16 9:26 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-16 10:30 ` [PATCH v4 0/2] " guoqi0226
2026-06-16 10:30 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] can: mcp251xfd: mcp251xfd: Cache and validate match data pointer in probe guoqi0226
2026-06-16 10:30 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] spi: Add NULL check for spi_get_device_id() in spi_get_device_match_data() guoqi0226
2026-06-16 10:45 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-16 10:35 ` [PATCH v4 0/2] can: mcp251xfd: Add ACPI device ID table for MCP251XFD Mark Brown
[not found] ` <15819af8.9491.19ed00ac23e.Coremail.guoqi0226@163.com>
2026-06-16 10:51 ` Mark Brown
2026-06-16 10:52 ` guoqi0226
2026-06-16 9:45 ` [PATCH v2 0/1] can: mcp251x: Add ACPI device ID table for MCP2515 Marc Kleine-Budde
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260616104511.DD9CC1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=guoqi0226@163.com \
--cc=linux-can@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mailhol@kernel.org \
--cc=mkl@pengutronix.de \
--cc=o.rempel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=socketcan@hartkopp.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.