All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Sebastian Ene" <sebastianene@google.com>
Cc: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, "Oliver Upton" <oupton@kernel.org>,
	"Marc Zyngier" <maz@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/7] KVM: arm64: Support FFA_NOTIFICATION_SET in host handler
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2026 15:54:45 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260616155445.F34C51F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260616154149.2763214-6-sebastianene@google.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] The MBZ (Must Be Zero) check for the `flags` parameter (W2) in `do_ffa_notif_set` uses an incorrect mask, leaving bits [31:16] completely unvalidated.
--

commit 18c05e4ad6759f3bb72be1916c4e1abac54bcb30
Author: Sebastian Ene <sebastianene@google.com>

KVM: arm64: Support FFA_NOTIFICATION_SET in host handler

This commit adds support for proxying FF-A notification SET messages from the
pKVM hypervisor to TrustZone. It introduces validation to enforce MBZ and SBZ
fields before forwarding the call.

> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/ffa.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/ffa.c
> index adf8680f32663..fdf1e5fb67267 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/ffa.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/ffa.c

[ ... ]

> @@ -975,6 +975,32 @@ static void do_ffa_notif_unbind(struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs *res,
>  	hyp_smccc_1_2_smc(args, res);
>  }
>  
> +static void do_ffa_notif_set(struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs *res,
> +			     struct kvm_cpu_context *ctxt)
> +{
> +	DECLARE_REG(u32, endp_id, ctxt, 1);
> +	DECLARE_REG(u32, flags, ctxt, 2);
> +	struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs *args;
> +
> +	if (FIELD_GET(FFA_NOTIF_SENDER_ENDP_MASK, endp_id) != HOST_FFA_ID) {
> +		ffa_to_smccc_res(res, FFA_RET_INVALID_PARAMETERS);
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (ffa_check_unused_args_sbz(ctxt, 5)) {
> +		ffa_to_smccc_res(res, FFA_RET_INVALID_PARAMETERS);
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (flags & GENMASK(15, 2)) {
[Severity: Medium]
Does this mask properly validate all reserved bits?

The FF-A specification dictates that for the FFA_NOTIFICATION_SET interface,
bits 31 through 2 of the flags parameter passed in W2 are reserved and must
be zero. By using GENMASK(15, 2), the upper 16 bits of the 32-bit flags
variable are completely ignored.

Can this allow a malicious or buggy host to pass non-zero upper bits that
silently bypass validation and get proxied to EL3?

> +		ffa_to_smccc_res(res, FFA_RET_INVALID_PARAMETERS);
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
> +	args = (void *)&ctxt->regs.regs[0];
> +	hyp_smccc_1_2_smc(args, res);
> +}

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260616154149.2763214-1-sebastianene@google.com?part=5

  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-16 15:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-16 15:41 [PATCH v4 0/7] KVM: arm64: Forward FFA_NOTIFICATION* calls to TrustZone Sebastian Ene
2026-06-16 15:41 ` [PATCH v4 1/7] KVM: arm64: Enforce strict SBZ checks in the FF-A proxy Sebastian Ene
2026-06-16 16:00   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-16 15:41 ` [PATCH v4 2/7] KVM: arm64: Forward FFA_NOTIFICATION_BITMAP calls to Trustzone Sebastian Ene
2026-06-16 15:58   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-16 15:41 ` [PATCH v4 3/7] KVM: arm64: Support FFA_NOTIFICATION_BIND in host handler Sebastian Ene
2026-06-16 15:41 ` [PATCH v4 4/7] KVM: arm64: Support FFA_NOTIFICATION_UNBIND " Sebastian Ene
2026-06-16 15:41 ` [PATCH v4 5/7] KVM: arm64: Support FFA_NOTIFICATION_SET " Sebastian Ene
2026-06-16 15:54   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-16 15:41 ` [PATCH v4 6/7] KVM: arm64: Support FFA_NOTIFICATION_GET " Sebastian Ene
2026-06-16 15:41 ` [PATCH v4 7/7] KVM: arm64: Support FFA_NOTIFICATION_INFO_GET " Sebastian Ene
2026-06-16 16:03   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-23 11:24 ` [PATCH v4 0/7] KVM: arm64: Forward FFA_NOTIFICATION* calls to TrustZone Vincent Donnefort

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260616155445.F34C51F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=oupton@kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=sebastianene@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.