From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1FBCE3C4B81 for ; Tue, 16 Jun 2026 03:44:37 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1781581479; cv=none; b=tyGA03dPRXxhRAbMNVBMPP+FItxG8nor5Ux8vHXGvJlYD/c6t5mChjHlz5wa58MI0aksWGuQewInSN07kmmRoUcaH31+CpLHyKIMNCtRfj6WCy2RrXZ7iE/sPTpOhayaZyfdE6WaOczYMEspQyZUaObGMl632+hPPjzDUlvp7jI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1781581479; c=relaxed/simple; bh=dDHTNKZOwnE3CNHCeVtY1wit/6kzjJ5yOkt6faLtcOA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=dMuu0MeC51YxPObPt1j34g9oogg5cwUj8YiEGP7Q1/ikpj74zBC4A+ugc9tbMKnTqQLSDY0fqta1FSzsMNhz8+XQzS4IBXvM5EfSg4itU6Mwl+RKVNoa7TYFjUQ4qZDVvu0z2j4XlvFneDPfYf3v/FHJFtBGJs1FlH5dr330NJE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b=Y3UpWRP8; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="Y3UpWRP8" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B474B1F00A3A; Tue, 16 Jun 2026 03:44:36 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1781581477; bh=aH+x2q1OmkZMQzSooQ3QhyG6CxtQQtl+8Xz6k8T0aR8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=Y3UpWRP80+q6equkBld5DP1HSK8Dl0Gweec1+V9B+5In0I8FKkgN7k49UwXo3SLMt ucWYkvdlCnq1ORmndmACHpbEcyz3z5x/MlaY3qVIxoH0DVrxDXbd6H2bY4E8wrjwMm DLGUB5RtNnaBJBa7lVAnz4rUtNSHcUUmn5V2FMVk= Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2026 09:13:33 +0530 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Ilpo =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=E4rvinen?= Cc: "Ionut Nechita (Wind River)" , stable@kernel.org, Andy Shevchenko , wander@redhat.com, chris.friesen@windriver.com, linux-serial Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6.12.y 00/10] serial: 8250_dw: backport BUSY deassert series Message-ID: <2026061641-cozy-creatable-9a9e@gregkh> References: <20260513065028.112468-1-ionut.nechita@windriver.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: On Wed, May 13, 2026 at 01:16:31PM +0300, Ilpo Järvinen wrote: > On Wed, 13 May 2026, Ionut Nechita (Wind River) wrote: > > > From: Ionut Nechita > > > > Hi Greg, Ilpo, > > > > This is v2 of the 8250_dw BUSY deassert backport to 6.12.y, > > addressing Ilpo's review feedback on v1. > > FYI, this came up yesterday related to guard()s vs unlock variants: > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-serial/cover.1778592805.git.jnilo@free.fr/ Yeah, I'm not going to take these now, I'd like to see a lot more testing and some actual reasons why this is needed in this tree. So far windriver's track-record for backports is really low/bad so I'll just drop them from my review queue right now. thanks, greg k-h