From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
David Laight <david.laight.linux@gmail.com>,
linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] lib/raid/xor: x86: Add AVX-512 optimized xor_gen()
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2026 07:56:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260617055653.GB19218@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260615190338.26581-1-ebiggers@kernel.org>
Can use the xor: prefix used for all other commits to lib/raid/xor?
> Benchmark on AMD Ryzen 9 9950X (Zen 5):
>
> src_cnt avx avx512 Improvement
> ======= ========== ========== ===========
> 1 56353 MB/s 75388 MB/s 33%
> 2 54274 MB/s 68409 MB/s 26%
> 3 44649 MB/s 64042 MB/s 43%
> 4 41315 MB/s 55002 MB/s 33%
On my Zen 5 mobile (AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350) both the existing
AVX2 and this AVX512 code give numbers in the 200+ GB/s range. Not
sure if is just the different benchmarking or something else going on.
FYI, one or 2 sources are basically useless as they RAID5 configs
that have no benefits over simple mirroring and thus the numbers
aren't too interesting.
> +DO_XOR_BLOCKS(avx512_inner, xor_avx512_2, xor_avx512_3, xor_avx512_4,
> + xor_avx512_5);
Is there really much of a benefit of doing the historic DO_XOR_BLOCKS
vs doing the loop manually? Especially as the common cases for a
modern RAID will usually loop over more disks than this was built
for. I.e., in practice one or two source buffers only happen at the
end of a loop over more disks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-17 5:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-15 19:03 [PATCH v3] lib/raid/xor: x86: Add AVX-512 optimized xor_gen() Eric Biggers
2026-06-15 19:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-15 20:10 ` Eric Biggers
2026-06-15 21:16 ` Borislav Petkov
2026-06-15 21:29 ` Eric Biggers
2026-06-15 23:53 ` Borislav Petkov
2026-06-16 0:29 ` Dave Hansen
2026-06-17 5:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-06-16 8:13 ` David Laight
2026-06-17 5:56 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2026-06-17 10:05 ` David Laight
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260617055653.GB19218@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david.laight.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.