From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Shivani Nittor" <shivani@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] perf scripts: Add configurable sorting option to powerpc-hcalls
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2026 14:46:41 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260617144642.092BE1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260617144011.17359-1-shivani@linux.ibm.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] The `--sort` argument value is not validated, leading to silently ignored user intent and misleading output for invalid keys.
--
commit 1aa1f92efbcdcc2ec41737225787d40ac02abf40
Author: Shivani Nittor <shivani@linux.ibm.com>
perf scripts: Add configurable sorting option to powerpc-hcalls
The powerpc-hcalls.py script currently prints hypercall statistics in a
fixed sort order based on the number of hcall occurrences. This patch
adds a --sort option to runtime-configure the sort order (count, min, max, avg).
> diff --git a/tools/perf/scripts/python/powerpc-hcalls.py b/tools/perf/scripts/python/powerpc-hcalls.py
> index 8b78dc790adb1..e5b0c1bee65fb 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/scripts/python/powerpc-hcalls.py
> +++ b/tools/perf/scripts/python/powerpc-hcalls.py
[ ... ]
> @@ -158,10 +159,45 @@ def hcall_table_lookup(opcode):
>
> print_ptrn = '%-28s%10s%10s%10s%10s'
>
> +def sort_output(opcode):
> + stats = output[opcode]
> +
> + if sort_key == 'min':
> + return stats['min']
> + if sort_key == 'max':
> + return stats['max']
> + if sort_key == 'avg':
> + return stats['time'] // stats['cnt']
> +
> + return stats['cnt']
> +
> +def trace_begin():
> + global sort_key
> +
> + i = 1
> + while i < len(sys.argv):
> + arg = sys.argv[i]
> +
> + if arg == '-s' or arg == '--sort':
> + if i + 1 >= len(sys.argv):
> + print("Error: -s/--sort requires a sort key argument")
> + sys.exit(1)
> + sort_key = sys.argv[i + 1]
> + i += 2
> + continue
> +
> + if arg.startswith('--sort='):
> + sort_key = arg.split('=', 1)[1]
> +
> + i += 1
> +
> + print("SORT KEY =", sort_key)
[Severity: Medium]
Will this result in silently falling back to sorting by count if an invalid
sort key is provided?
If a user runs the script with an invalid sort option like --sort=latency,
trace_begin() will assign it to sort_key and print "SORT KEY = latency".
Then in sort_output(), it will fall through the conditionals and return
stats['cnt'], leaving the user with output sorted by count despite the
printed sort key.
Could we add validation for the sort_key argument to error out if it isn't
one of the expected values (count, min, max, avg)?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260617144011.17359-1-shivani@linux.ibm.com?part=1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-17 14:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-17 14:40 [PATCH v2] perf scripts: Add configurable sorting option to powerpc-hcalls Shivani Nittor
2026-06-17 14:46 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260617144642.092BE1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=shivani@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.