From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Sebastian Ene" <sebastianene@google.com>
Cc: "Oliver Upton" <oupton@kernel.org>,
"Marc Zyngier" <maz@kernel.org>,
kvmarm@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 7/7] KVM: arm64: Zero out the stack initialized data in the FFA handler
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2026 15:29:01 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260617152902.0C7731F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260617145130.3729015-8-sebastianene@google.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Downgrade responses from EL3 during FF-A version negotiation are silently ignored and used as a higher version.
--
commit 0d02d44ef9bc090a9ae03e08d6cec358827371ce
Author: Sebastian Ene <sebastianene@google.com>
KVM: arm64: Zero out the stack initialized data in the FFA handler
This commit prevents leaking hypervisor stack data to the host when using
the FFA_VERSION call by explicitly zeroing the stack-allocated variable
before returning data.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260616160016.C62C81F000E9@smtp.kernel.org/
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/ffa.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/ffa.c
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/ffa.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/ffa.c
> @@ -883,7 +883,7 @@ static void do_ffa_part_get(struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs *res,
>
> bool kvm_host_ffa_handler(struct kvm_cpu_context *host_ctxt, u32 func_id)
> {
> - struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs res;
> + struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs res = {0};
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but while looking at the FF-A
version handling, I noticed an issue with version negotiation in
do_ffa_version().
When EL2 queries EL3 during version negotiation, does the code correctly
handle downgrade responses?
It appears EL2 only checks if the response is FFA_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED:
arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/ffa.c:do_ffa_version() {
hyp_smccc_1_2_smc(&(struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs) {
.a0 = FFA_VERSION,
.a1 = ffa_req_version,
}, res);
if ((s32)res->a0 == FFA_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED)
goto unlock;
hyp_ffa_version = ffa_req_version;
}
If EL3 returns a version smaller than the requested ffa_req_version
(a downgrade response), should res->a0 be validated against ffa_req_version
before unconditionally setting hyp_ffa_version = ffa_req_version?
Silently using a higher version than EL3 actually supports might cause
struct layout misinterpretations (like mismatched offsets) leading to
memory corruption or out-of-bounds reads during subsequent memory sharing
calls.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260617145130.3729015-1-sebastianene@google.com?part=7
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-17 15:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-17 14:51 [PATCH v7 0/7] arm_ffa, KVM: Fix FF-A emad offset calculations Sebastian Ene
2026-06-17 14:51 ` Sebastian Ene via OP-TEE
2026-06-17 14:51 ` [PATCH v7 1/7] optee: ffa: Add NULL check in optee_ffa_lend_protmem Sebastian Ene
2026-06-17 14:51 ` Sebastian Ene via OP-TEE
2026-06-17 15:07 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-17 14:51 ` [PATCH v7 2/7] firmware: arm_ffa: Fix out-of-bound writes in ffa_setup_and_transmit() Sebastian Ene
2026-06-17 14:51 ` Sebastian Ene via OP-TEE
2026-06-17 14:51 ` [PATCH v7 3/7] firmware: arm_ffa: Fix Endpoint Memory Access Descriptor offset calculation Sebastian Ene
2026-06-17 14:51 ` Sebastian Ene via OP-TEE
2026-06-17 14:51 ` [PATCH v7 4/7] KVM: arm64: Fix bounds checking in do_ffa_mem_reclaim() Sebastian Ene
2026-06-17 14:51 ` Sebastian Ene via OP-TEE
2026-06-17 15:18 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-17 14:51 ` [PATCH v7 5/7] KVM: arm64: Validate the offset to the mem access descriptor Sebastian Ene
2026-06-17 14:51 ` Sebastian Ene via OP-TEE
2026-06-17 14:51 ` [PATCH v7 6/7] KVM: arm64: Ensure FFA ranges are page aligned Sebastian Ene
2026-06-17 14:51 ` Sebastian Ene via OP-TEE
2026-06-17 14:51 ` [PATCH v7 7/7] KVM: arm64: Zero out the stack initialized data in the FFA handler Sebastian Ene
2026-06-17 14:51 ` Sebastian Ene via OP-TEE
2026-06-17 15:29 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260617152902.0C7731F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oupton@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sebastianene@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.