From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] xor/kunit: add a benchmark
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2026 17:14:48 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260617171448.GD785086@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260617054416.3841334-3-hch@lst.de>
On Wed, Jun 17, 2026 at 07:44:04AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> diff --git a/lib/raid/xor/tests/xor_kunit.c b/lib/raid/xor/tests/xor_kunit.c
> index 659ae3edbc25..5939b78b3944 100644
> --- a/lib/raid/xor/tests/xor_kunit.c
> +++ b/lib/raid/xor/tests/xor_kunit.c
> @@ -125,8 +125,71 @@ static void xor_test(struct kunit *test)
> }
> }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_XOR_BENCHMARK
> +static void xor_benchmark(struct kunit *test)
The #ifdef can be avoided using kunit_skip(), as the crypto and CRC
tests do:
if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_XOR_BENCHMARK))
kunit_skip(test, "not enabled");
> + for (j = 0; j < ARRAY_SIZE(len_to_test); j++) {
> + unsigned int len = len_to_test[j];
> + const unsigned long num_iters = 1000;
> +
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, len, 0);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_LE(test, len, XOR_KUNIT_MAX_BYTES);
> +
> + preempt_disable();
> + t = ktime_get();
> + for (l = 0; l < num_iters; l++)
> + xor_gen(test_dest, test_buffers, nr, len);
> + t = ktime_get_ns() - t;
> + preempt_enable();
First one should be ktime_get_ns(), not ktime_get().
> +
> + speed[j] = div_u64((u64)len * num_iters * nr, t);
> + }
> +
> + static_assert(ARRAY_SIZE(len_to_test) == 2);
> + kunit_info(test, "%3u disks:\t%5llu GB/s\t%5llu GB/s\n",
> + nr, speed[0], speed[1]);
As mentioned in the other thread, this measures the speed at which the
source data is consumed, which differs from the code in
lib/raid/xor/xor-core.c that measures the speed at which the destination
data is produced. Probably best to make them consistent.
- Eric
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-17 17:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-17 5:44 xor: add a kunit benchmark Christoph Hellwig
2026-06-17 5:44 ` [PATCH 1/2] xor/kunit: fix a spelling error Christoph Hellwig
2026-06-17 5:44 ` [PATCH 2/2] xor/kunit: add a benchmark Christoph Hellwig
2026-06-17 6:00 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-17 17:14 ` Eric Biggers [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260617171448.GD785086@google.com \
--to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.