All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Michael Bommarito" <michael.bommarito@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-input@vger.kernel.org, dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] HID: roccat: add KUnit test for kone profile-index bounds
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2026 03:14:29 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260618031429.C79481F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260618030036.1880139-3-michael.bommarito@gmail.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] A Use-After-Free vulnerability occurs because the `kone_device` structure is freed while hardware interrupts are still active, leaving a dangling pointer in `hid_drvdata`.
- [High] Uninitialized kernel memory is copied to the persistent `kone->settings` structure on a failed USB control message, leading to a heap information leak via sysfs.
--

commit e8aee21a8be54aaf776b4d76c32eeaefd255b5aa
Author: Michael Bommarito <michael.bommarito@gmail.com>

HID: roccat: add KUnit test for kone profile-index bounds

This commit adds a KUnit test for the Roccat Kone driver to verify bounds
checking on profile indices. It simulates a crafted switch-profile event to
ensure the driver does not read out-of-bounds.

> diff --git a/drivers/hid/Kconfig b/drivers/hid/Kconfig
> index ff2f580b660ba..3c6bc918aeb54 100644
> --- a/drivers/hid/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/hid/Kconfig
> @@ -1057,6 +1057,15 @@ config HID_ROCCAT
>  	Say Y here if you have a Roccat mouse or keyboard and want
>  	support for its special functionalities.
>  
> +config HID_ROCCAT_KONE_KUNIT_TEST
> +	bool "KUnit tests for the Roccat Kone driver" if !KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
> +	depends on HID_ROCCAT=y && KUNIT=y
> +	default KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
> +	help
> +	  Enable the KUnit regression tests for the Roccat Kone driver,
> +	  covering bounds checking of device-supplied profile indices.
> +	  If unsure, say N.
> +
>  config HID_SAITEK
>  	tristate "Saitek (Mad Catz) non-fully HID-compliant devices"
>  	help
> diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-roccat-kone.c b/drivers/hid/hid-roccat-kone.c
> index 17495fcc8b7da..3dae9eaa0b6f4 100644
> --- a/drivers/hid/hid-roccat-kone.c
> +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-roccat-kone.c

[ ... ]

> @@ -919,3 +919,60 @@ module_exit(kone_exit);
>  MODULE_AUTHOR("Stefan Achatz");
>  MODULE_DESCRIPTION("USB Roccat Kone driver");
>  MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
> +
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HID_ROCCAT_KONE_KUNIT_TEST)
> +#include <kunit/test.h>
> +
> +/*
> + * Regression test for the out-of-bounds read in
> + * kone_keep_values_up_to_date(): a malicious USB device sends a
> + * "switch profile" HID event (event == kone_mouse_event_switch_profile)
> + * with an attacker-chosen value in 0..255, which is used unbounded as
> + * profiles[value - 1].  On an unpatched kernel the attack case triggers a
> + * KASAN slab-out-of-bounds read; the fix must leave actual_dpi unchanged.
> + */
> +static void kone_profile_index_oob_test(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> +	struct kone_device *kone;
> +	struct kone_mouse_event ev = {};

[ ... ]

> +	/* attack: value == ARRAY_SIZE(profiles) + 1 reads profiles[5], one
> +	 * element past the array end -> KASAN slab-out-of-bounds read on an
> +	 * unpatched kernel. The fix must reject it (actual_dpi unchanged).
> +	 */
> +	ev.value = ARRAY_SIZE(kone->profiles) + 1;
> +	kone_keep_values_up_to_date(kone, &ev);
> +	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, kone->actual_dpi, 0x42);
> +}
> +
> +static struct kunit_case kone_test_cases[] = {
> +	KUNIT_CASE(kone_profile_index_oob_test),
> +	{}
> +};
> +
> +static struct kunit_suite kone_test_suite = {
> +	.name = "hid-roccat-kone",
> +	.test_cases = kone_test_cases,
> +};
> +kunit_test_suite(kone_test_suite);
> +#endif /* CONFIG_HID_ROCCAT_KONE_KUNIT_TEST */

[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but while reviewing I noticed a
potential use-after-free vulnerability in the driver initialization and
teardown paths.

In kone_probe(), hid_hw_start() is called before kone_init_specials(),
starting the hardware and enabling USB interrupts. If initialization fails,
the error path frees the driver data but does not clear the pointer:

drivers/hid/hid-roccat-kone.c:kone_init_specials() {
...
exit_free:
	kfree(kone);
	return retval;
}

Between kfree() and hid_hw_stop(), an incoming USB interrupt will trigger
kone_raw_event(), which dereferences the dangling pointer:

drivers/hid/hid-roccat-kone.c:kone_raw_event() {
...
	struct kone_device *kone = hid_get_drvdata(hdev);
...
}

The same window exists in the teardown path, where the driver state is freed
before stopping the hardware:

drivers/hid/hid-roccat-kone.c:kone_remove() {
...
	kone_remove_specials(hdev);
	hid_hw_stop(hdev);
}

Is it possible for an attacker to trigger this use-after-free by
disconnecting the device or simulating a device error while hardware
interrupts are active?

[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but there appears to be a potential heap
information leak when copying uninitialized memory after a failed USB
transfer.

In kone_receive(), a bounce buffer is allocated with kmalloc() and
unconditionally copied to the target even if the USB transfer fails:

drivers/hid/hid-roccat-kone.c:kone_receive() {
	buf = kmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
...
	retval = usb_control_msg(usb_dev, usb_rcvctrlpipe(usb_dev, 0), ...
...
	memcpy(data, buf, size);
	kfree(buf);
	return retval;
}

When called via kone_get_settings(), the uninitialized kernel heap memory
is copied to the persistent settings structure. If this occurs during a
sysfs operation where the error is handled, the corrupted structure remains
intact:

drivers/hid/hid-roccat-kone.c:kone_sysfs_set_tcu() {
...
	retval = kone_get_settings(usb_dev, &kone->settings);
	if (retval)
		goto exit_no_settings;
...
}

A subsequent read of the settings sysfs attribute exposes this memory
directly to userspace:

drivers/hid/hid-roccat-kone.c:kone_sysfs_read_settings() {
...
	memcpy(buf, ((char const *)&kone->settings) + off, count);
...
}

Could a malicious USB device intentionally fail the transfer to exploit
this leak? Should we check the return value of usb_control_msg() before
calling memcpy() in kone_receive()?

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260618030036.1880139-1-michael.bommarito@gmail.com?part=2

      reply	other threads:[~2026-06-18  3:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-18  3:00 [PATCH 0/2] HID: roccat: bound device-supplied profile index Michael Bommarito
2026-06-18  3:00 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Michael Bommarito
2026-06-18  3:18   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-18  3:00 ` [PATCH 2/2] HID: roccat: add KUnit test for kone profile-index bounds Michael Bommarito
2026-06-18  3:14   ` sashiko-bot [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260618031429.C79481F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=michael.bommarito@gmail.com \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.