From: Jimmy Zuber <jamz@amazon.com>
To: <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Cc: <fuse-devel@lists.linux.dev>, <jamz@amazon.com>,
<linux-api@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>,
<shuah@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] fuse: allow FUSE_SYNCFS for privileged userspace servers
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2026 16:33:37 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260619163337.1138220-1-jamz@amazon.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJfpeguaa4U6Tsxh5opeaLeYQQxP6MQsRMu_JATJwwgj=OBt3Q@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, 16 Jun 2026, Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu> wrote:
> Sounds really easy to trick: start the server in the initial user ns,
> then clone the mounter with a new user/mount namespace. The
> init_user_ns test will pass happily, since the server is running in
> the initial namespace.
Ah, the intention was to limit sync to sufficiently privileged FUSE
setups. I missed that the initial user namespace is not equivalent to
elevated permissions. I am thinking instead it would make sense to
assert that the opener of /dev/fuse has CAP_SYS_ADMIN in the initial
user namespace. They could then hand off the fd to a less privileged
server, but that is the prerogative of that privileged user, so I think
it satisfies the spirit of the DoS prevention requirement.
I will follow up shortly with a new version.
Thank you!
Jimmy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-19 16:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-16 15:19 [PATCH 0/2] fuse: allow FUSE_SYNCFS for privileged userspace servers Jimmy Zuber
2026-06-16 15:19 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Jimmy Zuber
2026-06-17 8:22 ` Miklos Szeredi
2026-06-19 16:33 ` Jimmy Zuber [this message]
2026-06-16 15:19 ` [PATCH 2/2] selftests/fuse: add test for FUSE_HAS_SYNCFS privilege gating Jimmy Zuber
2026-06-19 17:02 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] fuse: allow FUSE_SYNCFS for privileged userspace servers Jimmy Zuber
2026-06-19 17:02 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] " Jimmy Zuber
2026-06-19 17:02 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] selftests/fuse: add test for FUSE_HAS_SYNCFS privilege gating Jimmy Zuber
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260619163337.1138220-1-jamz@amazon.com \
--to=jamz@amazon.com \
--cc=fuse-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.