From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@kernel.org>
Cc: "Alexandre Courbot" <acourbot@nvidia.com>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, ojeda@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 01/16] rust: drm: ioctl: fix unbounded lifetimes in ioctl handler arguments
Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2026 18:57:48 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260620185748.777631F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260620184924.2247517-2-dakr@kernel.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] The patch routes the ioctl data buffer to `__call_ioctl` as a generic void pointer, inferring the type of `Data` purely from the user-provided handler closure rather than enforcing it matches the UAPI struct. This removes compile-time type safety and allows an incorrect handler signature to cause a silent heap out-of-bounds access.
--
commit cb52c14a04f657a72b41bd28dae4125aa6d86907
Author: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>
rust: drm: ioctl: fix unbounded lifetimes in ioctl handler arguments
This patch fixes unbounded lifetimes in declare_drm_ioctls! by routing
references through a helper function __call_ioctl tied to a local anchor
variable.
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260620011346.A47D01F000E9@smtp.kernel.org/
> diff --git a/rust/kernel/drm/ioctl.rs b/rust/kernel/drm/ioctl.rs
> index cf328101dde4e..023e6da5c1e4b 100644
> --- a/rust/kernel/drm/ioctl.rs
> +++ b/rust/kernel/drm/ioctl.rs
> @@ -70,6 +70,39 @@ pub mod internal {
[ ... ]
> + pub unsafe fn __call_ioctl<
> + 'a,
> + Dev: 'a,
> + Data: 'a,
> + F: super::super::file::DriverFile + 'a,
> + Ret,
> + >(
> + _anchor: &'a (),
> + dev: &'a Dev,
> + raw_data: *mut ::core::ffi::c_void,
> + raw_file: *mut drm_file,
> + f: impl FnOnce(&'a Dev, &'a mut Data, &'a super::super::File<F>) -> Ret,
> + ) -> Ret {
> + // SAFETY: Caller guarantees raw_data points to a valid instance of Data with the correct
> + // size and alignment, exclusively owned for the duration of the ioctl call.
> + let data = unsafe { &mut *(raw_data.cast::<Data>()) };
[Severity: High]
Does this type inference break the macro's memory safety guarantees?
Because Data is a generic type parameter and isn't explicitly specified, the
Rust compiler will infer it from the signature of the handler function. If a
driver author mistakenly writes an ioctl handler that takes a differently
sized or larger UAPI struct, Data will be inferred as that larger type.
Since raw_data points to a kernel buffer of size _IOC_SIZE(cmd) matching the
original macro struct, dereferencing it as a larger type would create a
reference that extends past the end of the allocated memory, leading to a
silent heap out-of-bounds access.
> + // SAFETY: Caller guarantees raw_file is a valid pointer to a `struct drm_file`.
> + let file = unsafe { super::super::File::<F>::from_raw(raw_file) };
> + f(dev, data, file)
> + }
> }
>
> /// Declare the DRM ioctls for a driver.
[ ... ]
> @@ -135,19 +168,19 @@ macro_rules! declare_drm_ioctls {
> - let data = unsafe { &mut *(raw_data.cast::<$crate::uapi::$struct>()) };
> - // SAFETY: This is just the DRM file structure
> - let file = unsafe { $crate::drm::File::from_raw(raw_file) };
> -
> - match $func(dev, data, file) {
> + let __anchor = ();
> +
> + // SAFETY:
> + // - The ioctl argument has size `_IOC_SIZE(cmd)`, which we asserted
> + // above matches the size of this type, and all bit patterns of UAPI
> + // structs must be valid. The argument is exclusively owned by this
> + // handler, guaranteed by `drm_ioctl()` to remain valid for the
> + // duration of the call.
> + // - `raw_file` is a valid `struct drm_file` pointer provided by the
> + // DRM core.
> + match unsafe { $crate::drm::ioctl::internal::__call_ioctl(
> + &__anchor, dev, raw_data, raw_file, $func,
> + ) } {
[Severity: High]
Is there a way to enforce the UAPI $struct type here?
Prior to this patch, declare_drm_ioctls! explicitly cast raw_data to the
declared UAPI struct, which forced a compile-time error if the user-provided
handler expected a different type.
By passing the handler function directly to __call_ioctl without constraining
the Data type to $crate::uapi::$struct, the compile-time type safety checking
appears to be bypassed, allowing the inference issue described above.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260620184924.2247517-1-dakr@kernel.org?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-20 18:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-20 18:47 [PATCH v4 00/16] rust: drm: Higher-Ranked Lifetime private data Danilo Krummrich
2026-06-20 18:47 ` [PATCH v4 01/16] rust: drm: ioctl: fix unbounded lifetimes in ioctl handler arguments Danilo Krummrich
2026-06-20 18:57 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-20 18:47 ` [PATCH v4 02/16] rust: drm: rename Uninit DeviceContext to Normal Danilo Krummrich
2026-06-20 18:47 ` [PATCH v4 03/16] rust: drm: Add Driver::ParentDevice associated type Danilo Krummrich
2026-06-20 18:47 ` [PATCH v4 04/16] rust: drm: change default DeviceContext to Normal Danilo Krummrich
2026-06-20 18:47 ` [PATCH v4 05/16] rust: drm: restrict AlwaysRefCounted to Normal Device context Danilo Krummrich
2026-06-20 19:03 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-20 18:47 ` [PATCH v4 06/16] rust: drm: restrict AlwaysRefCounted to Normal GEM Object context Danilo Krummrich
2026-06-20 21:00 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-20 18:48 ` [PATCH v4 07/16] rust: drm: split Deref for Device context typestates Danilo Krummrich
2026-06-20 18:48 ` [PATCH v4 08/16] rust: drm: pin ioctl Device reference to Normal context Danilo Krummrich
2026-06-20 18:59 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-20 18:48 ` [PATCH v4 09/16] rust: drm: add Ioctl device context typestate Danilo Krummrich
2026-06-20 18:48 ` [PATCH v4 10/16] rust: drm: Add RegistrationGuard for drm_dev_enter/exit critical sections Danilo Krummrich
2026-06-20 19:03 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-20 18:48 ` [PATCH v4 11/16] rust: drm: Wrap ioctl dispatch in RegistrationGuard Danilo Krummrich
2026-06-20 18:58 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-20 18:48 ` [PATCH v4 12/16] rust: drm: return ParentDevice from Device AsRef Danilo Krummrich
2026-06-20 19:01 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-20 18:48 ` [PATCH v4 13/16] rust: drm: add AsRef<ParentDevice<Bound>> for Device<Registered> Danilo Krummrich
2026-06-20 19:02 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-20 18:48 ` [PATCH v4 14/16] rust: drm: Add RegistrationData to drm::Driver Danilo Krummrich
2026-06-20 19:06 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-20 18:48 ` [PATCH v4 15/16] rust: drm: Pass registration data to ioctl handlers Danilo Krummrich
2026-06-20 19:13 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-20 18:48 ` [PATCH v4 16/16] drm: nova: Use drm::Device<Registered> to access the parent bus device Danilo Krummrich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260620185748.777631F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=acourbot@nvidia.com \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.