From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 93140238D52 for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2026 20:25:07 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1782073508; cv=none; b=LxvDmR6gbPO6EwJv0sfHiP17BVVCZEujq9UbgQvMxMX9ikeyVQyUY5lLmBRsqKeCDq5c07ds/iD6OX8PEvpMKEYFk7pVovX5PKqdmfonGiMaqoJFl/GzFkKM36wDK1/3laYMc2YG2wGh+Hk4Mjn2NxT/Sg/QBjJy/bQZT/AQ2sQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1782073508; c=relaxed/simple; bh=NOd4JteZZo3fhjx+FB46lNLW8KlEvMqbRxfInaQHK1c=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=gpQ4Q8kYvzy0vL4wGZmBSJp/ZJOKBi/tDHDWiavQC5e26d1/YvjSedCz9ZZEA+2u1lsBxc3A6JTQbNJolWKRFN+vELGGX28GVZ54h/wbP04YUwLqermGqaWVfk25aEk9waMJVEUTGYTylGTMCpzVo4EH5uHOAn2D+xoUsH6lHSg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=R7mWVGOW; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="R7mWVGOW" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id ABBB21F000E9; Sun, 21 Jun 2026 20:25:06 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1782073507; bh=myMpHoq5kbJxp9dCQJqSqk9v52Xd9t8kZelr0gJpNa0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=R7mWVGOWt5/FFzKl1UWRe9E4UtWNEO23/0HFZsF9xVldq8xiTjf00QTAQYuGNHe7u AQGEl8lHTo2ePvxs42eaIKhiM7jPDql9XcPiFSuUSHswBmsSx3YPHteb2JqRJcXu5C 0HC7a9vZ9huO86ehJPQ71Mgur7Gmm4VNgngsy/H5ktTePoUyqaYgBBSW8XEB16LX6t MIkCc0Bz/loYfoEfKYx43RNPC8VMp734wG7ldHsVXNdmZR4e4YgqleCpE63Bt4iQaz YebA7uZ1S/gUB1Mu70WkiITyF6ukGd1nBA8pm9EeD8u257PlvXwYvqYfoAYgqHn6Wd hl1hqz2YNVyow== From: SeongJae Park To: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Cc: SeongJae Park , damon@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1.2 08/17] mm/damon/core: remove damon_verify_reset_aggregated() Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2026 13:24:57 -0700 Message-ID: <20260621202457.10538-1-sj@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.3 In-Reply-To: <20260621160629.AAE441F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: damon@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Sun, 21 Jun 2026 16:06:29 +0000 sashiko-bot@kernel.org wrote: > Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider: > - [Low] Misspelling of the field name in the commit message. > -- > > commit 859f6640a11f9d1e3f6d935049f590ffd710d9f9 > Author: SeongJae Park > > mm/damon/core: remove damon_verify_reset_aggregated() > > This commit removes the damon_verify_reset_aggregated() validation function > from the core DAMON logic, as the field it checks is no longer utilized in > actual scenarios. > > > nr_accesse_bp is no longer being used in real use cases. Remove its > > validation function. > > [Severity: Low] > This isn't a bug, but there is a typo in the commit message here. The field > name is spelled "nr_accesse_bp" instead of the correct "nr_accesses_bp". Good finding, I will fix this in the next revision. Thanks, SJ [...]