All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "David Hu" <xuehaohu@google.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dma-buf: Split sgl by largest page-aligned chunk
Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2026 22:34:49 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260621223450.0C3DA1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260621222130.1667453-1-xuehaohu@google.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 4 potential issue(s) to consider:

Pre-existing issues:
- [Critical] Calling `sg_set_page` with a `NULL` page parameter triggers a kernel panic when `CONFIG_DEBUG_VM` and SPARSEMEM without VMEMMAP are enabled.
- [High] Calculating the number of scatterlist entries (`nents`) using `DIV_ROUND_UP()` overflows on 32-bit architectures, resulting in `nents = 0` and uninitialized or empty scatterlists for large buffer lengths.
- [High] dma_unmap_phys() is invoked iteratively on chunked scatterlist addresses and lengths rather than the exact address and size initially mapped by dma_map_phys().
- [High] The error path in `dma_buf_phys_vec_to_sgt` unmaps all allocated scatterlist entries, including unpopulated ones, leading to invalid DMA unmap requests.
--

commit f6cce91b1ad2e1c68270e81a3cd60cffb903c456
Author: David Hu <xuehaohu@google.com>

dma-buf: Split sgl by largest page-aligned chunk

Currently, fill_sg_entry() splits the scatterlist using UINT_MAX, resulting
in non-page-aligned DMA addresses for subsequent entries. This patch changes
the split size to the largest page-aligned chunk within UINT_MAX to satisfy
hardware DMA alignment constraints.

Reported-by: sashiko-bot <sashiko-bot@kernel.org>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260609165431.778061F00893@smtp.kernel.org/
Fixes: 3aa31a8bb11e ("dma-buf: provide phys_vec to scatter-gather mapping routine")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: David Hu <xuehaohu@google.com>

> diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf-mapping.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf-mapping.c
> index 794acff2546a3..f2bde38fdb1f7 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf-mapping.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf-mapping.c
> @@ -12,9 +15,9 @@ static struct scatterlist *fill_sg_entry(struct scatterlist *sgl, size_t length,
>  	unsigned int len, nents;
>  	int i;
>  
> -	nents = DIV_ROUND_UP(length, UINT_MAX);
> +	nents = DIV_ROUND_UP(length, MAX_ENT_SZ);

[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but does this DIV_ROUND_UP
calculation overflow on 32-bit architectures?

On 32-bit platforms, size_t is 32 bits and MAX_ENT_SZ evaluates to 0xFFFFF000
assuming 4KB pages. The DIV_ROUND_UP macro expands to:

(length + MAX_ENT_SZ - 1) / MAX_ENT_SZ

If the length is greater than PAGE_SIZE, the numerator wraps around in 32-bit
arithmetic, resulting in a small value that evaluates to 0. This skips the
scatterlist setup loop entirely for large buffer lengths.

>  	for (i = 0; i < nents; i++) {
> -		len = min_t(size_t, length, UINT_MAX);
> +		len = min_t(size_t, length, MAX_ENT_SZ);
>  		length -= len;
>  		/*
>  		 * DMABUF abuses scatterlist to create a scatterlist
> @@ -24,7 +27,7 @@ static struct scatterlist *fill_sg_entry(struct scatterlist *sgl, size_t length,
>  		 * does not require the CPU list for mapping or unmapping.
>  		 */
>  		sg_set_page(sgl, NULL, 0, 0);

[Severity: Critical]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does passing NULL to sg_set_page here
cause a kernel panic under certain configurations?

When CONFIG_DEBUG_VM and classic SPARSEMEM without VMEMMAP are enabled,
sg_set_page calls page_range_contiguous, which unconditionally calls
page_to_pfn.

On these setups, page_to_pfn determines the memory section by dereferencing
the page flags. Dereferencing a NULL page pointer here causes an immediate
kernel oops.

[ ... ]

> @@ -41,14 +44,14 @@ static unsigned int calc_sg_nents(struct dma_iova_state *state,
>  
>  	if (!state || !dma_use_iova(state)) {
>  		for (i = 0; i < nr_ranges; i++)
> -			nents += DIV_ROUND_UP(phys_vec[i].len, UINT_MAX);
> +			nents += DIV_ROUND_UP(phys_vec[i].len, MAX_ENT_SZ);

[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does this calculation also suffer from the
same 32-bit overflow mentioned above, resolving to 0 for large lengths?

[ ... ]

[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but looking at how the
scatterlists populated by fill_sg_entry are mapped and unmapped, are we
violating the DMA API contract in dma_buf_free_sgt?

In dma_buf_phys_vec_to_sgt, a monolithic physical range is mapped using a
single dma_map_phys call, and then fill_sg_entry splits it into chunks.

However, in dma_buf_free_sgt, dma_unmap_phys is iteratively called on each
individual scatterlist chunk:

for_each_sgtable_dma_sg(sgt, sgl, i)
    dma_unmap_phys(attach->dev, sg_dma_address(sgl),
                   sg_dma_len(sgl), dir, DMA_ATTR_MMIO);

The DMA API requires that an allocation must be unmapped using the exact
same address and size parameters passed during creation. Chunked unmapping
violates this requirement.

[Severity: High]
This is also a pre-existing issue, but does the error path in
dma_buf_phys_vec_to_sgt incorrectly handle unmapping?

If dma_map_phys fails, the code jumps to the err_unmap_dma label. The error
loop uses:

for_each_sgtable_dma_sg(&dma->sgt, sgl, i)
    dma_unmap_phys(attach->dev, sg_dma_address(sgl), ...);

Because the loop macro uses i as its internal iterator up to
dma->sgt.nents, which was initialized to the total allocated entries,
it overwrites the failure index.

This causes it to iterate over all allocated entries, including unpopulated
ones, passing 0 for the address and length to dma_unmap_phys, which leads
to invalid DMA unmap requests.

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260621222130.1667453-1-xuehaohu@google.com?part=1

  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-21 22:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-21 22:21 [PATCH] dma-buf: Split sgl by largest page-aligned chunk David Hu
2026-06-21 22:34 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-22  8:13 ` David Laight

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260621223450.0C3DA1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=xuehaohu@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.