All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Hongling Zeng" <zenghongling@kylinos.cn>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] nouveau/gsp/rm/bar: Cleanup IS_ERR_OR_NULL usage
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2026 04:07:58 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260622040758.AB5971F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260622035454.28003-5-zenghongling@kylinos.cn>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Large GSP RPC messages are leaked when an error occurs during chunked transmission.
--

commit fa8eea5c56bcb72beec86aeaab70f0ec3eed80b9
Author: Hongling Zeng <zenghongling@kylinos.cn>

nouveau/gsp/rm/bar: Cleanup IS_ERR_OR_NULL usage

r535_bar_bar2_update_pde() calls nvkm_gsp_rpc_get() which never
returns NULL, only valid pointers or error pointers. Clean up by
using IS_ERR() instead, matching the actual return value contract.

> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/gsp/rm/r535/bar.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/gsp/rm/r535/bar.c
> index fae08ac3b18c7..9cd68f8622d36 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/gsp/rm/r535/bar.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/gsp/rm/r535/bar.c
> @@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ r535_bar_bar2_update_pde(struct nvkm_gsp *gsp, u8 page_shift, u64 pdbe)
>  	rpc_update_bar_pde_v15_00 *rpc;
>  
>  	rpc = nvkm_gsp_rpc_get(gsp, NV_VGPU_MSG_FUNCTION_UPDATE_BAR_PDE, sizeof(*rpc));
> -	if (WARN_ON(IS_ERR_OR_NULL(rpc)))
> +	if (WARN_ON(IS_ERR(rpc)))
>  		return -EIO;
>  
>  	rpc->info.barType = NV_RPC_UPDATE_PDE_BAR_2;

[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but while looking at the GSP RPC handling, I
noticed a potential memory leak in r535_gsp_rpc_push().

When transmitting large GSP RPC payloads (where payload_size is larger than
max_payload_size), the original large message buffer (msg) can be leaked if
an error occurs.

If an error occurs during the chunking process, such as failing to allocate
a smaller chunk, the code jumps to the done label:

drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/gsp/rm/r535/rpc.c:r535_gsp_rpc_push() {
    ...
		next = r535_gsp_rpc_get(gsp, NV_VGPU_MSG_FUNCTION_CONTINUATION_RECORD, size);
		if (IS_ERR(next)) {
			repv = next;
			goto done;
		}
    ...

The same happens if there's a timeout or error from r535_gsp_rpc_send():

			repv = r535_gsp_rpc_send(gsp, next, NVKM_GSP_RPC_REPLY_NOWAIT, 0);
			if (IS_ERR(repv))
				goto done;
    ...

Also, if r535_gsp_rpc_handle_reply() returns an error, the code skips the free:

		/* Wait for reply. */
		repv = r535_gsp_rpc_handle_reply(gsp, fn, policy, payload_size +
						 sizeof(*rpc));
		if (!IS_ERR(repv))
			kvfree(msg);
	} else {
    ...
done:
	mutex_unlock(&gsp->cmdq.mutex);
	return repv;
}

Since the done label only drops the mutex and returns, doesn't this
permanently leak the msg buffer on any of these error paths?

Could this exacerbate memory pressure or lead to out of memory conditions if
large RPC transmissions repeatedly fail?

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260622035454.28003-1-zenghongling@kylinos.cn?part=4

  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-22  4:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-22  3:54 [PATCH v4 0/5] nouveau/gsp: Clean up IS_ERR vs IS_ERR_OR_NULL usage Hongling Zeng
2026-06-22  3:54 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] nouveau/gsp/rpc: Document RPC function return value contracts Hongling Zeng
2026-06-22  9:19   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-22  3:54 ` Hongling Zeng
2026-06-22  3:54   ` Hongling Zeng
2026-06-22  4:08   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-22  3:54 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] nouveau/gsp/rpc: Cleanup incorrect IS_ERR_OR_NULL in rpc.c Hongling Zeng
2026-06-22  3:54   ` Hongling Zeng
2026-06-22  4:08   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-22  3:54 ` Hongling Zeng
2026-06-22  9:19   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-22  3:54 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] nouveau/gsp/rm/alloc: Cleanup IS_ERR_OR_NULL usage Hongling Zeng
2026-06-22  9:18   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-22  3:54 ` Hongling Zeng
2026-06-22  3:54 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] nouveau/gsp/rm/bar: " Hongling Zeng
2026-06-22  9:20   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-22  3:54 ` Hongling Zeng
2026-06-22  4:07   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-22  3:54 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] nouveau/gsp: Cleanup IS_ERR_OR_NULL in nvkm_gsp_rpc_rd() Hongling Zeng
2026-06-22  3:54   ` Hongling Zeng
2026-06-22  4:09   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-22  3:54 ` Hongling Zeng
2026-06-22  9:18   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260622040758.AB5971F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=zenghongling@kylinos.cn \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.