From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Hongling Zeng" <zenghongling@kylinos.cn>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/5] nouveau/gsp/rm/bar: Cleanup IS_ERR_OR_NULL usage
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2026 08:23:38 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260622082339.02A191F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260622081136.61695-5-zenghongling@kylinos.cn>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Leak of the original RPC message buffer `msg` in error paths of `r535_gsp_rpc_push()` when `payload_size > max_payload_size`.
--
commit c9821a8788c2a50e0c5a5dcb65a00cbd271b7c0b
Author: Hongling Zeng <zenghongling@kylinos.cn>
nouveau/gsp/rm/bar: Cleanup IS_ERR_OR_NULL usage
r535_bar_bar2_update_pde() calls nvkm_gsp_rpc_get() which never
returns NULL, only valid pointers or error pointers. Clean up by
using IS_ERR() instead, matching the actual return value contract.
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/gsp/rm/r535/bar.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/gsp/rm/r535/bar.c
> index fae08ac3b18c7..9cd68f8622d36 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/gsp/rm/r535/bar.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/gsp/rm/r535/bar.c
> @@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ r535_bar_bar2_update_pde(struct nvkm_gsp *gsp, u8 page_shift, u64 pdbe)
> rpc_update_bar_pde_v15_00 *rpc;
>
> rpc = nvkm_gsp_rpc_get(gsp, NV_VGPU_MSG_FUNCTION_UPDATE_BAR_PDE, sizeof(*rpc));
> - if (WARN_ON(IS_ERR_OR_NULL(rpc)))
> + if (WARN_ON(IS_ERR(rpc)))
> return -EIO;
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does r535_gsp_rpc_push() leak the original
RPC message buffer msg on error paths when payload_size > max_payload_size?
In drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/gsp/rm/r535/rpc.c:r535_gsp_rpc_push(),
when the message is chunked, kvfree(msg) is called on the success path:
next = r535_gsp_rpc_get(gsp, fn, max_payload_size);
if (IS_ERR(next)) {
repv = next;
goto done;
}
...
repv = r535_gsp_rpc_handle_reply(gsp, fn, policy, payload_size +
sizeof(*rpc));
if (!IS_ERR(repv))
kvfree(msg);
}
...
done:
mutex_unlock(&gsp->cmdq.mutex);
return repv;
If r535_gsp_rpc_get() fails, it jumps to done and returns without freeing
msg. Similarly, if r535_gsp_rpc_handle_reply() returns an error pointer,
msg is not freed because kvfree(msg) is guarded by !IS_ERR(repv).
Since these allocations can be large, can this cause a resource leak if the
RPC communications fail under load?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260622081136.61695-1-zenghongling@kylinos.cn?part=4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-22 8:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-22 8:11 [PATCH v5 0/5] nouveau/gsp: Clean up IS_ERR vs IS_ERR_OR_NULL usage Hongling Zeng
2026-06-22 8:11 ` [PATCH v5 1/5] nouveau/gsp/rpc: Document RPC function return value contracts Hongling Zeng
2026-06-22 9:18 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-22 8:11 ` Hongling Zeng
2026-06-22 8:11 ` Hongling Zeng
2026-06-22 8:21 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-22 8:11 ` [PATCH v5 2/5] nouveau/gsp/rpc: Cleanup incorrect IS_ERR_OR_NULL in rpc.c Hongling Zeng
2026-06-22 8:11 ` Hongling Zeng
2026-06-22 8:27 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-22 8:11 ` Hongling Zeng
2026-06-22 9:22 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-22 8:11 ` [PATCH v5 3/5] nouveau/gsp/rm/alloc: Cleanup IS_ERR_OR_NULL usage Hongling Zeng
2026-06-22 9:19 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-22 8:11 ` Hongling Zeng
2026-06-22 8:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-22 8:11 ` [PATCH v5 4/5] nouveau/gsp/rm/bar: " Hongling Zeng
2026-06-22 9:30 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-22 8:11 ` Hongling Zeng
2026-06-22 8:23 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-22 8:11 ` [PATCH v5 5/5] nouveau/gsp: Cleanup IS_ERR_OR_NULL in nvkm_gsp_rpc_rd() Hongling Zeng
2026-06-22 9:32 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-22 8:11 ` Hongling Zeng
2026-06-22 8:11 ` Hongling Zeng
2026-06-22 8:36 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260622082339.02A191F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=zenghongling@kylinos.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.