From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Sebastian Ene" <sebastianene@google.com>
Cc: "Marc Zyngier" <maz@kernel.org>,
kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, "Oliver Upton" <oupton@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/7] KVM: arm64: Support FFA_NOTIFICATION_UNBIND in host handler
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2026 12:05:56 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260623120557.24A8D1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260623115354.632361-5-sebastianene@google.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] FFA_NOTIFICATION_UNBIND incorrectly treats the Notification ID bitmap parameter (W2) as a reserved field and requires it to be 0, preventing the host from unbinding notifications and causing a firmware resource leak.
--
commit 33f494c35955148d0babe5e028baf1876db19208
Author: Sebastian Ene <sebastianene@google.com>
KVM: arm64: Support FFA_NOTIFICATION_UNBIND in host handler
This commit adds support for the FFA_NOTIFICATION_UNBIND interface in the
host handler, verifying arguments before forwarding the message to TrustZone.
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/ffa.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/ffa.c
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/ffa.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/ffa.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -957,6 +956,27 @@ static void do_ffa_notif_bind(struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs *res,
> hyp_smccc_1_2_smc(args, res);
> }
>
> +static void do_ffa_notif_unbind(struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs *res,
> + struct kvm_cpu_context *ctxt)
> +{
> + DECLARE_REG(u32, endp_id, ctxt, 1);
> + DECLARE_REG(u32, reserved, ctxt, 2);
> + struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs *args;
> +
> + if (ffa_check_unused_args_sbz(ctxt, 5) || reserved) {
> + ffa_to_smccc_res(res, FFA_RET_INVALID_PARAMETERS);
> + return;
> + }
[Severity: High]
Does this reject valid unbind requests by forcing W2 to be zero?
It looks like W2 is extracted as reserved and required to be 0 here. However,
the FF-A specification uses W2 to pass the Notification ID bitmap for the
FFA_NOTIFICATION_UNBIND call.
If the host attempts to unbind a notification with a non-zero bitmap, this
check will reject the call with FFA_RET_INVALID_PARAMETERS. Could this
prevent the host from successfully unbinding notifications, potentially
causing a notification tracking resource leak in the secure monitor over time?
> +
> + if (FIELD_GET(FFA_NOTIF_RECEIVER_ENDP_MASK, endp_id) != HOST_FFA_ID) {
> + ffa_to_smccc_res(res, FFA_RET_INVALID_PARAMETERS);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + args = (void *)&ctxt->regs.regs[0];
> + hyp_smccc_1_2_smc(args, res);
> +}
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260623115354.632361-1-sebastianene@google.com?part=4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-23 12:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-23 11:53 [PATCH v5 0/7] KVM: arm64: Forward FFA_NOTIFICATION* calls to TrustZone Sebastian Ene
2026-06-23 11:53 ` [PATCH v5 1/7] KVM: arm64: Enforce strict SBZ checks in the FF-A proxy Sebastian Ene
2026-06-23 12:06 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-25 13:16 ` Will Deacon
2026-06-26 7:48 ` Sebastian Ene
2026-06-23 11:53 ` [PATCH v5 2/7] KVM: arm64: Forward FFA_NOTIFICATION_BITMAP calls to Trustzone Sebastian Ene
2026-06-23 11:53 ` [PATCH v5 3/7] KVM: arm64: Support FFA_NOTIFICATION_BIND in host handler Sebastian Ene
2026-06-23 12:07 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-23 11:53 ` [PATCH v5 4/7] KVM: arm64: Support FFA_NOTIFICATION_UNBIND " Sebastian Ene
2026-06-23 12:05 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-23 11:53 ` [PATCH v5 5/7] KVM: arm64: Support FFA_NOTIFICATION_SET " Sebastian Ene
2026-06-23 12:01 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-23 11:53 ` [PATCH v5 6/7] KVM: arm64: Support FFA_NOTIFICATION_GET " Sebastian Ene
2026-06-23 11:53 ` [PATCH v5 7/7] KVM: arm64: Support FFA_NOTIFICATION_INFO_GET " Sebastian Ene
2026-06-23 12:07 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260623120557.24A8D1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oupton@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sebastianene@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.