From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org (smtp4.osuosl.org [140.211.166.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C42A38AC85 for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2026 17:26:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=140.211.166.137 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1782235612; cv=none; b=UlKjPMfMjhJk4k6M65O6zAKSrALNcPEJvYndaUmjCXUGtI/Afs+fBKbJqwnXOsYlMY+Pnb4T/Of5vnf8BQxvCWP02QwWo4SudPLweTnl9mcNjOvle3WnaCfbxNCjSwubIYHlNK6s+1J1znHZJKfZtgGLBXyeG53n3XHs0Nh9Ybs= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1782235612; c=relaxed/simple; bh=rip9uRV7z1MrHq44c9P9AtUk8yQpQ+kZiXRL/p9vnmE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Disposition; b=mHoYti4UMdvo9s1XePDXBMpuOctedUT/vONy5jofd6C2YoU98R34+lXdfy4mPg4pJ072F1QRHjem50CzR1ezhjv70UUGkdtghBE5K2/Rl5tT7izKz6OfkFDOy1BpBYtQsEyjW/qqMBDZI5e7oVXj5GocBAe6xAp3ays/Y0hReD8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=UMHkL/cB; arc=none smtp.client-ip=140.211.166.137 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="UMHkL/cB" Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 752F640A10 for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2026 17:26:49 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavis at osuosl.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -5.792 X-Spam-Level: Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp4.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10024) with ESMTP id O82nPo5hbpPs for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2026 17:26:48 +0000 (UTC) Received-SPF: Pass (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=170.10.133.124; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com; envelope-from=mst@redhat.com; receiver= DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 smtp4.osuosl.org 603AF40A0C Authentication-Results: smtp4.osuosl.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp4.osuosl.org 603AF40A0C Authentication-Results: smtp4.osuosl.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=UMHkL/cB Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 603AF40A0C for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2026 17:26:47 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1782235606; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=lVPkNP6BJkSGxsw8Xm+oSCJFyrrNmnKR4VG6pNKWuqE=; b=UMHkL/cBt9u4LU5O9Ozvgx4IZp1j7yLBffa2cpF18SDH9hmeWTZi6O5GC7Rq73z+C2a+MT yHQY2ZI3EtM6J/qvuFBc5xjxnZ7hDafE4MqeLBvHb/Bvp0p/wmMDhUFtuS1q4TquQRxc+c s7WbtS1iVZiM5zn0GHVfciHrMEirlq8= Received: from mail-wr1-f72.google.com (mail-wr1-f72.google.com [209.85.221.72]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-454-0Br9UMBWNX25iQRFMzQ88w-1; Tue, 23 Jun 2026 13:26:44 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 0Br9UMBWNX25iQRFMzQ88w-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: 0Br9UMBWNX25iQRFMzQ88w_1782235604 Received: by mail-wr1-f72.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-463aaa77ffeso68630f8f.3 for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2026 10:26:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20251104; t=1782235603; x=1782840403; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=lVPkNP6BJkSGxsw8Xm+oSCJFyrrNmnKR4VG6pNKWuqE=; b=Ev60num8hbx5+SOG8aJKwmLOMIgm/CrnHH8bGyK97N3SKn9xXsssrfwOpC0dc6ZxPy RA1ow9eranIz5UhvW7InC5Ti1xLCz1SzqXopgWhmEvCo7YVDIRxXviPiew1U498qdcLH 0H1gArC+CQSkHBEaB0l5YjkKG5LGDNx6KbZAzJJsyzY7xloLv+tsdacQA3rnm/ApOdmN D6FtpTpJgikH8iWRl36sYbZaKd3e5HMEEyYUFv3d77tqDJYSEPeFDZRIomCirXCIHB+Y /zyCXurKviMvOxe/3BIAqmQ/ZpfnaTo+dC82sKi1kMEcdG+EQnEeF/iNhSCjrmhM7An2 Qj/g== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AFNElJ8Swy3JZpZgEhMw5UP+9iXee+o6ljk3pWm/6NjbvjzyPKHI8dN6g/EfgAse05j8VOcjfaoL4vOtP07DADbBjw==@lists.linux-foundation.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yx9VM0PNL79+M806/Dfgx1OFcAyjuMTcv1MR5rLE8aBR5ATdImJ 2jFH54A4UN9Apwq+kB7n9Iqyz2xUtF5RySr2IfSJBHdHz7BNcuImNHI12P9QWIW3SHy4PR+3198 dhina1rRQT+J1qC2wKxbP305fS8igHoAUHwxAJJdr8j4QopGiRkNBdsBdOfmtmwIxIf//FnpU1/ qOYx4cnCc= X-Gm-Gg: AfdE7cm2DzwaTl0Zv8PQMPsPhanXZu12BdQgrc4nFsUoGOKOTtwPgYnFHJ2dt4LF3Su +7hOOVBHh7Lc12oaJB9ThsA1GOHUEZyowZj1rgevZA5/M56h3xuRlc3ctPta0WmpPM9Z71Nf37q VgoSCC5VzcHLVgoENqDh6BGnlhx9CCdx4JRDznvGs77AHKMBGiSbSB/nJa2vlsJ4xGpdifp+fnc i7cn8f8R4DsWQz0eyNxn11o7nNnZiBVQGM6A2CE+cpKxQa9BjlAzl20O3AqLX+eNHrRN3uqc9C9 RopHqrYYLIGhnbz1ImAWoLQQIJnImfdxlHEFm8NT3q5iCTMv8aw1oZUzQkkTE/G4dJJa0La0ckq d35Y+3QYmXoxNh+LqsvkLxko50qYkIM4n X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:d4:b0:488:ac01:72de with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-49240e20de0mr257222915e9.5.1782235603254; Tue, 23 Jun 2026 10:26:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:d4:b0:488:ac01:72de with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-49240e20de0mr257222385e9.5.1782235602685; Tue, 23 Jun 2026 10:26:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from redhat.com (IGLD-80-230-85-71.inter.net.il. [80.230.85.71]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 5b1f17b1804b1-4923fd15535sm425803415e9.3.2026.06.23.10.26.39 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 23 Jun 2026 10:26:41 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2026 13:26:38 -0400 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" To: Arseniy Krasnov Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi , Stefano Garzarella , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Jason Wang , Bobby Eshleman , Xuan Zhuo , Eugenio =?iso-8859-1?Q?P=E9rez?= , Simon Horman , kvm@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, oxffffaa@gmail.com, rulkc@linuxtesting.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3] vsock/virtio: rewrite MSG_ZEROCOPY flag handling Message-ID: <20260623132014-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> References: <20260623153819.697635-1-avkrasnov@rulkc.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: virtualization@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20260623153819.697635-1-avkrasnov@rulkc.org> X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-MFC-PROC-ID: BLP3dI9M4kIDRgbT6H7QppV1pBpBajXUSL-ojgVYzyw_1782235604 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, Jun 23, 2026 at 06:38:19PM +0300, Arseniy Krasnov wrote: > Logically it was based on TCP implementation, so to make further support > easier, rewrite it in the TCP way (like in 'tcp_sendmsg_locked()'). This > patch only rewrites flag handling (e.g. it doesn't change logic). > > Signed-off-by: Arseniy Krasnov It seems to change logic though: > --- > Changelog v1->v2: > * Rebase on last 'net-next'. Don't need 'skb_zcopy_set()' now - it was > already added. > Changelog v2->v3: > * Update commit message. > * Remove one empty line. > > net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c | 47 ++++++++++++------------- > 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c > index 09475007165b..41c2a0b82a8e 100644 > --- a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c > +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c > @@ -328,38 +328,35 @@ static int virtio_transport_send_pkt_info(struct vsock_sock *vsk, > if (pkt_len == 0 && info->op == VIRTIO_VSOCK_OP_RW) > return pkt_len; > > - if (info->msg) { > - /* If zerocopy is not enabled by 'setsockopt()', we behave as > - * there is no MSG_ZEROCOPY flag set. > + if (info->msg && (info->msg->msg_flags & MSG_ZEROCOPY)) { > + /* If 'info->msg' is not NULL, this is only VIRTIO_VSOCK_OP_RW. > + * 'MSG_ZEROCOPY' flag handling here is based on the same flag > + * handling from 'tcp_sendmsg_locked()'. > */ > - if (!sock_flag(sk_vsock(vsk), SOCK_ZEROCOPY)) > - info->msg->msg_flags &= ~MSG_ZEROCOPY; So previously without SOCK_ZEROCOPY, MSG_ZEROCOPY was always ignored... > + if (info->msg->msg_ubuf) { > + uarg = info->msg->msg_ubuf; > + can_zcopy = virtio_transport_can_zcopy(t_ops, info, pkt_len); now it's not in this case? Maybe the right call, but saying "does not change logic" seems wrong. > + } else if (sock_flag(sk_vsock(vsk), SOCK_ZEROCOPY)) { > + uarg = msg_zerocopy_realloc(sk_vsock(vsk), pkt_len, > + NULL, false); > + if (!uarg) { > + virtio_transport_put_credit(vvs, pkt_len); > + return -ENOMEM; > + } > > - if (info->msg->msg_flags & MSG_ZEROCOPY) > can_zcopy = virtio_transport_can_zcopy(t_ops, info, pkt_len); > + if (!can_zcopy) > + uarg_to_msgzc(uarg)->zerocopy = 0; > > + have_uref = true; > + } > + > + /* 'can_zcopy' means that this transmission will be > + * in zerocopy way (e.g. using 'frags' array). > + */ > if (can_zcopy) > max_skb_len = min_t(u32, VIRTIO_VSOCK_MAX_PKT_BUF_SIZE, > (MAX_SKB_FRAGS * PAGE_SIZE)); > - > - if (info->msg->msg_flags & MSG_ZEROCOPY && > - info->op == VIRTIO_VSOCK_OP_RW) { > - uarg = info->msg->msg_ubuf; > - > - if (!uarg) { > - uarg = msg_zerocopy_realloc(sk_vsock(vsk), > - pkt_len, NULL, false); > - if (!uarg) { > - virtio_transport_put_credit(vvs, pkt_len); > - return -ENOMEM; > - } > - > - if (!can_zcopy) > - uarg_to_msgzc(uarg)->zerocopy = 0; > - > - have_uref = true; > - } > - } > } > > rest_len = pkt_len; > -- > 2.25.1