From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
Cc: Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>,
Tushar Vyavahare <tushar.vyavahare@intel.com>,
<netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <magnus.karlsson@intel.com>,
<stfomichev@gmail.com>, <kernelxing@tencent.com>,
<davem@davemloft.net>, <pabeni@redhat.com>, <ast@kernel.org>,
<daniel@iogearbox.net>, <tirthendu.sarkar@intel.com>,
<bpf@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/3] selftests/xsk: stabilize timeout test behavior
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2026 13:36:33 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260623133633.34c6fad7@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ajqfDYznpCU18C2P@boxer>
On Tue, 23 Jun 2026 16:58:21 +0200 Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2026 at 11:02:48AM +0200, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
> > last refactor from Tushar broke BIDIRECTIONAL test case when HW is test
> > target, but not on veth, so let me test these changes locally and then get
> > back to you.
> >
> > BPF CI runs xskxceiver on veth so this has not been caught. Seems my/our
> > focus should be to enable xskxceiver HW tests on any kind of
> > environment/infrastructure.
> >
> > Gonna get back to you by the EOD.
> > Maciej
>
> Ah I replied on other thread I guess, so let me repeat:
>
> Acked-by: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
> Tested-by: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
Great, thanks!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-23 20:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-16 15:49 [PATCH net-next 0/3] selftests/xsk: stabilize timeout test behavior Tushar Vyavahare
2026-06-16 15:49 ` [PATCH net-next 1/3] selftests/xsk: make poll timeout mode explicit Tushar Vyavahare
2026-06-16 15:49 ` [PATCH net-next 2/3] selftests/xsk: fix timeout thread harness sequencing Tushar Vyavahare
2026-06-16 15:49 ` [PATCH net-next 3/3] selftests/xsk: restore shared_umem after POLL_TXQ_FULL Tushar Vyavahare
2026-06-16 23:39 ` [PATCH net-next 0/3] selftests/xsk: stabilize timeout test behavior Jason Xing
2026-06-17 9:43 ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-06-17 10:03 ` Jason Xing
2026-06-22 23:07 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-06-22 23:48 ` Jason Xing
2026-06-23 9:02 ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-06-23 14:58 ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-06-23 20:36 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2026-06-23 14:56 ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-06-23 20:50 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260623133633.34c6fad7@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=kerneljasonxing@gmail.com \
--cc=kernelxing@tencent.com \
--cc=maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
--cc=magnus.karlsson@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=stfomichev@gmail.com \
--cc=tirthendu.sarkar@intel.com \
--cc=tushar.vyavahare@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.