From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Ian Rogers" <irogers@google.com>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 03/13] perf top: Fix sb_evlist leak
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2026 21:26:56 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260623212657.3ABB11F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260623053515.2677888-4-irogers@google.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Error path in `record__setup_sb_evlist()` bypasses state update, leading to a segmentation fault from an uninitialized `pthread_join()`.
- [High] Sideband thread and `sb_evlist` are leaked when using `--switch-output-event` together with `--no-bpf-event`.
--
commit 9bc374ffd1b7ae00f5342c051ca479b32bc92942
Author: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
perf top: Fix sb_evlist leak
Fix a memory leak in cmd_top() where top.sb_evlist was not freed if
evlist__add_bpf_sb_event() fails. Note that evlist__start_sb_thread() and
evlist__stop_sb_thread() take ownership of the evlist and free it, so
we must only free it if we fail before starting the thread.
> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-top.c b/tools/perf/builtin-top.c
> index 5933c46ee137e..abc74b8ab7599 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-top.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-top.c
> @@ -1881,6 +1881,7 @@ int cmd_top(int argc, const char **argv)
> if (evlist__add_bpf_sb_event(top.sb_evlist, &host_env)) {
> pr_err("Couldn't ask for PERF_RECORD_BPF_EVENT side band events.\n.");
> status = -EINVAL;
> + evlist__put(top.sb_evlist);
> goto out_put_evlist;
> }
> }
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does tools/perf/builtin-record.c have a
similar problem where the error path in record__setup_sb_evlist() bypasses
updating the state?
If evlist__add_bpf_sb_event() fails in record__setup_sb_evlist(), it
returns -1 without updating the opts->no_bpf_event flag:
tools/perf/builtin-record.c:record__setup_sb_evlist() {
...
if (evlist__add_bpf_sb_event(rec->sb_evlist, perf_session__env(rec->session))) {
pr_err("Couldn't ask for PERF_RECORD_BPF_EVENT side band events.\n.");
return -1;
}
...
}
During cleanup in __cmd_record(), the unmodified no_bpf_event flag causes
evlist__stop_sb_thread() to be unconditionally invoked:
tools/perf/builtin-record.c:__cmd_record() {
...
if (!opts->no_bpf_event)
evlist__stop_sb_thread(rec->sb_evlist);
...
}
This could blindly call pthread_join() on the uninitialized thread ID in
evlist__stop_sb_thread():
tools/perf/util/sideband_evlist.c:evlist__stop_sb_thread() {
...
pthread_join(*evlist__sb_thread_th(evlist), NULL);
...
}
Could this trigger undefined behavior and a crash?
[Severity: High]
This is also a pre-existing issue, but is there a leak of the sideband
thread and sb_evlist in tools/perf/builtin-record.c when using
--switch-output-event together with --no-bpf-event?
In record__setup_sb_evlist(), the sideband thread is started when using
--switch-output-event, even if BPF events are disabled:
tools/perf/builtin-record.c:record__setup_sb_evlist() {
...
if (evlist__start_sb_thread(rec->sb_evlist, &rec->opts.target)) {
...
}
However, cleanup in __cmd_record() is bypassed because opts->no_bpf_event
evaluates to true:
tools/perf/builtin-record.c:__cmd_record() {
...
if (!opts->no_bpf_event)
evlist__stop_sb_thread(rec->sb_evlist);
...
}
Does this permanently strand the background poll thread and leak the
allocated evlist during process teardown?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260623053515.2677888-1-irogers@google.com?part=3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-23 21:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-23 5:35 [PATCH v1 00/13] perf python: Fix python extension bugs and memory leaks Ian Rogers
2026-06-23 5:35 ` [PATCH v1 01/13] perf script: Fix metric_evlist leak in script_find_metrics Ian Rogers
2026-06-23 5:35 ` [PATCH v1 02/13] perf stat: Fix evsel_list leak in cmd_stat Ian Rogers
2026-06-23 5:35 ` [PATCH v1 03/13] perf top: Fix sb_evlist leak Ian Rogers
2026-06-23 21:26 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-23 5:35 ` [PATCH v1 04/13] perf python: Fix memory leak in pyrf_evlist__get_pollfd Ian Rogers
2026-06-23 21:34 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-23 5:35 ` [PATCH v1 05/13] perf synthetic-events: Fix uninitialized pthread_join Ian Rogers
2026-06-23 21:41 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-23 5:35 ` [PATCH v1 06/13] perf data: Fix directory file descriptor leak in perf_data__switch Ian Rogers
2026-06-23 5:35 ` [PATCH v1 07/13] perf test: Fix skiplist leak in cmd_test Ian Rogers
2026-06-23 5:35 ` [PATCH v1 08/13] perf python: Check counts_values size in set_values Ian Rogers
2026-06-23 22:08 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-23 5:35 ` [PATCH v1 09/13] perf python: Validate CPU and thread maps in pyrf_evsel__open Ian Rogers
2026-06-23 22:17 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-23 5:35 ` [PATCH v1 10/13] perf python: Validate attribute setters in pyrf_evsel Ian Rogers
2026-06-23 5:35 ` [PATCH v1 11/13] perf python: Zero initialize perf_data in pyrf_data__init Ian Rogers
2026-06-23 22:44 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-23 5:35 ` [PATCH v1 12/13] perf python: Add thread uninitialized checks Ian Rogers
2026-06-23 22:49 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-23 5:35 ` [PATCH v1 13/13] perf python: Fix MetricGroup return type in perf.pyi Ian Rogers
2026-06-23 22:41 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260623212657.3ABB11F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.