From: Carlo Szelinsky <github@szelinsky.de>
To: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>,
Kory Maincent <kory.maincent@bootlin.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Cc: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
Corey Leavitt <corey@leavitt.info>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Carlo Szelinsky <github@szelinsky.de>
Subject: [PATCH net v2] net: pse-pd: scope pse_control regulator handle to kref lifetime
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2026 22:40:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260624204017.2752934-1-github@szelinsky.de> (raw)
From: Corey Leavitt <corey@leavitt.info>
__pse_control_release() drops psec->ps via devm_regulator_put(), which
only succeeds if the devres entry added by the matching
devm_regulator_get_exclusive() is still present on pcdev->dev at the
time the pse_control's kref hits zero.
That assumption does not hold when the controller is unbound while a
pse_control still has consumers: pcdev->dev's devres list is released
LIFO, so every per-attach regulator-GET devres runs (and
regulator_put()s the underlying regulator) before
pse_controller_unregister() itself is invoked. Any later
pse_control_put() from that unbind path then reads psec->ps as a
dangling pointer inside devm_regulator_put() and WARNs at
drivers/regulator/devres.c:232 (devres_release() fails to find the
already-released match).
The pse_control's consumer handle is logically scoped to the
pse_control's refcount, not to pcdev->dev's devres lifetime. Switch to
the plain regulator_get_exclusive() / regulator_put() pair so the
regulator put in __pse_control_release() no longer depends on the
controller's devres still being present. No change to the
regulator-framework-visible refcount or lifetime of the underlying
regulator: a single get paired with a single put. The existing
devm_regulator_register() for the per-PI rails is unchanged (those ARE
correctly scoped to the controller's lifetime).
This addresses only the regulator handle. The same unbind-while-held
scenario also leaves __pse_control_release() reading psec->pcdev->pi[]
and psec->pcdev->owner after pse_controller_unregister() has freed
pcdev->pi, because the controller does not drain its outstanding
pse_control references on unregister. That wider pse_control vs
pcdev lifetime problem pre-dates this change and is addressed by the
PSE controller notifier series, which drains phydev->psec on
PSE_UNREGISTERED before pcdev->pi is freed.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20260620112440.1734404-1-github@szelinsky.de/
Fixes: d83e13761d5b ("net: pse-pd: Use regulator framework within PSE framework")
Signed-off-by: Corey Leavitt <corey@leavitt.info>
Acked-by: Kory Maincent <kory.maincent@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Carlo Szelinsky <github@szelinsky.de>
---
This is patch 1 of the "decouple controller lookup from MDIO probe"
series, reposted on its own for net as Jakub suggested. The rest of the
series targets net-next and is deferred until it reopens.
Changes in v2:
- Reword the commit message to scope the fix to the regulator handle.
As Simon's review pointed out, the same unbind-while-held path also
reads pcdev->pi[] and pcdev->owner after pse_release_pis(); that wider
pse_control vs pcdev lifetime issue is fixed by the notifier series,
not here. No code change.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20260624151251.1137250-1-horms@kernel.org/
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20260622192839.2508733-1-github@szelinsky.de/
---
drivers/net/pse-pd/pse_core.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/pse-pd/pse_core.c b/drivers/net/pse-pd/pse_core.c
index 69dbdbde9d71..a5e6d7b26b9f 100644
--- a/drivers/net/pse-pd/pse_core.c
+++ b/drivers/net/pse-pd/pse_core.c
@@ -1367,7 +1367,7 @@ static void __pse_control_release(struct kref *kref)
if (psec->pcdev->pi[psec->id].admin_state_enabled)
regulator_disable(psec->ps);
- devm_regulator_put(psec->ps);
+ regulator_put(psec->ps);
module_put(psec->pcdev->owner);
@@ -1436,8 +1436,8 @@ pse_control_get_internal(struct pse_controller_dev *pcdev, unsigned int index,
goto free_psec;
pcdev->pi[index].admin_state_enabled = ret;
- psec->ps = devm_regulator_get_exclusive(pcdev->dev,
- rdev_get_name(pcdev->pi[index].rdev));
+ psec->ps = regulator_get_exclusive(pcdev->dev,
+ rdev_get_name(pcdev->pi[index].rdev));
if (IS_ERR(psec->ps)) {
ret = PTR_ERR(psec->ps);
goto put_module;
base-commit: d87363b0edfc7504ff2b144fe4cdd8154f90f42e
--
2.43.0
reply other threads:[~2026-06-24 20:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260624204017.2752934-1-github@szelinsky.de \
--to=github@szelinsky.de \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=corey@leavitt.info \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kory.maincent@bootlin.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=o.rempel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.